Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Danxuan Liang
dblp:374/9206
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4449-7764ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 82% Health and well-being technologies · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
conversational agents |
1.1 | 2 | 2026 | Designing Scaffolding Strategies for Conversational Agents in Dialog Task of Neurocognitive Disorders Screening · CHI 2024 From Human Pragmatic Language Skills to Conversational Agent Design: A Systematic Review of Transfer Strategies · CHI 2026 |
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | From Human Pragmatic Language Skills to Conversational Agent Design: A Systematic Review of Transfer Strategies · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematic literature review · 3.0wizard-of-oz study · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | From Human Pragmatic Language Skills to Conversational Agent Design: A Systematic Review of Transfer StrategiesabstractWhile conversational agents’ (CAs) semantic and syntactic capabilities have advanced, their pragmatic skills, using language appropriately in context, have emerged as a critical focus in practical applications. Hence, scholars integrate conversational skills derived from human-human interaction into CA designs. However, existing research mainly adopts an empirical approach and focuses on specific CA deployment, making it challenging to identify overarching patterns or develop a comprehensive methodology for transferring human pragmatic skills to CA design. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of 85 studies from primary databases (e.g., ACM, IEEE, etc.), focusing on designing CAs with human-derived conversational skills. We identified skill categories (verbal, paralinguistic, nonverbal), transfer strategies (from dialog data, theories, and via co-design), implementations, and evaluation metrics. We consolidated these insights into a four-stage design process: human skill exploration, definition, transfer, and iterative evaluation. Future research can leverage this to design CAs that achieve conversational goals through contextually appropriate language use. Jiaxiong Hu, Xiwen Yao, Danxuan Liang, Dongjie Yang, Dingdong Liu, Junze Li, Yuanhao Zhang, Xiaojuan Ma |
CHI | 4 |
| 2024 | Designing Scaffolding Strategies for Conversational Agents in Dialog Task of Neurocognitive Disorders ScreeningabstractRegular screening is critical for individuals at risk of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) to receive early intervention. Conversational agents (CAs) have been adopted to administer dialog-based NCD screening tests for their scalability compared to human-administered tests. However, unique communication skills are required for CAs during NCD screening, e.g., clinicians often apply scaffolding to ensure subjects’ understanding of and engagement in screening tests. Based on scaffolding theories and analysis of clinicians’ practices from human-administered test recordings, we designed a scaffolding framework for the CA. In an exploratory wizard-of-Oz study, the CA empowered by ChatGPT administered tasks in the Grocery Shopping Dialog Task with 15 participants (10 diagnosed with NCDs). Clinical experts verified the quality of the CA’s scaffolding and we explored its effects on task understanding of the participants. Moreover, we proposed implications for the future design of CAs that enable scaffolding for scalable NCD screening. Jiaxiong Hu, Junze Li, Yuhang Zeng, Dongjie Yang, Danxuan Liang, Helen M. Meng, Xiaojuan Ma |
CHI | 5 |