Matthew R. Rudary

dblp:38/5408 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 36% Reinforcement learning · 27% Time series and sequential data · 15%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation
0.122006
Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006
A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
linear dynamical systems
0.112006
Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.112006
Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning
0.012004
Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal constraint satisfaction
0.012004
Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
compact representation
0.012003
A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.012003
A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003
Health and well-being technologies › cognitive support
reminder systems
0.012004
Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal constraint reasoning · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1spectral learning · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1predictive state representation · 0.0diversity representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems
abstract
We introduce the controlled predictive linear-Gaussian model (cPLG), a model that uses predictive state to model discrete-time dynamical systems with real-valued observations and vector-valued actions. This extends the PLG, an uncontrolled model recently introduced by Rudary et al. (2005). We show that the cPLG subsumes controlled linear dynamical systems (LDS, also called Kalman filter models) of equal dimension, but requires fewer parameters. We also introduce the predictive linear-quadratic Gaussian problem, a cost-minimization problem based on the cPLG that we show is equivalent to linear-quadratic Gaussian problems (LQG, sometimes called LQR). We present an algorithm to estimate cPLG parameters from data, and show that our algorithm is a consistent estimation procedure. Finally, we present empirical results suggesting that our algorithm performs favorably compared to expectation maximization on controlled LDS models.
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001
ICML1
2005 Predictive Linear-Gaussian Models of Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001, David Wingate
UAI1
2004 Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning
abstract
Reminder systems support people with impaired prospective memory and/or executive function, by providing them with reminders of their functional daily activities. We integrate temporal constraint reasoning with reinforcement learning (RL) to build an adaptive reminder system and in a simulated environment demonstrate that it can personalize to a user and adapt to both short- and long-term changes. In addition to advancing the application domain, our integrated algorithm contributes to research on temporal constraint reasoning by showing how RL can select an optimal policy from amongst a set of temporally consistent ones, and it contributes to the work on RL by showing how temporal constraint reasoning can be used to dramatically reduce the space of actions from which an RL agent needs to learn.
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001, Martha E. Pollack
ICML1
2004 Predictive State Representations: A New Theory for Modeling Dynamical Systems
Satinder Singh 0001, Michael R. James 0001, Matthew R. Rudary
UAI3
2003 A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation
abstract
Predictive state representations (PSRs) use predictions of a set of tests to represent the state of controlled dynamical systems. One reason why this representation is exciting as an alternative to partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) is that PSR models of dynamical systems may be much more compact than POMDP models. Empirical work on PSRs to date has focused on linear PSRs, which have not allowed for compression relative to POMDPs. We introduce a new notion of tests which allows us to define a new type of PSR that is nonlinear in general and allows for exponential compression in some deterministic dynami- cal systems. These new tests, called e-tests, are related to the tests used by Rivest and Schapire [1] in their work with the diversity representation, but our PSR avoids some of the pitfalls of their representation—in partic- ular, its potential to be exponentially larger than the equivalent POMDP.
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001
NIPS1