VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew R. Rudary
dblp:38/5408
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 36% Reinforcement learning · 27% Time series and sequential data · 15% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006 A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
linear dynamical systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systems · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal constraint satisfaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
compact representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | A Nonlinear Predictive State Representation · NIPS 2003 |
Health and well-being technologies › cognitive support
reminder systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning · ICML 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal constraint reasoning · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1spectral learning · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1predictive state representation · 0.0diversity representation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Predictive linear-Gaussian models of controlled stochastic dynamical systemsabstractWe introduce the controlled predictive linear-Gaussian model (cPLG), a model that uses predictive state to model discrete-time dynamical systems with real-valued observations and vector-valued actions. This extends the PLG, an uncontrolled model recently introduced by Rudary et al. (2005). We show that the cPLG subsumes controlled linear dynamical systems (LDS, also called Kalman filter models) of equal dimension, but requires fewer parameters. We also introduce the predictive linear-quadratic Gaussian problem, a cost-minimization problem based on the cPLG that we show is equivalent to linear-quadratic Gaussian problems (LQG, sometimes called LQR). We present an algorithm to estimate cPLG parameters from data, and show that our algorithm is a consistent estimation procedure. Finally, we present empirical results suggesting that our algorithm performs favorably compared to expectation maximization on controlled LDS models. Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2005 | Predictive Linear-Gaussian Models of Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001, David Wingate |
UAI | 1 |
| 2004 | Adaptive cognitive orthotics: combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoningabstractReminder systems support people with impaired prospective memory and/or executive function, by providing them with reminders of their functional daily activities. We integrate temporal constraint reasoning with reinforcement learning (RL) to build an adaptive reminder system and in a simulated environment demonstrate that it can personalize to a user and adapt to both short- and long-term changes. In addition to advancing the application domain, our integrated algorithm contributes to research on temporal constraint reasoning by showing how RL can select an optimal policy from amongst a set of temporally consistent ones, and it contributes to the work on RL by showing how temporal constraint reasoning can be used to dramatically reduce the space of actions from which an RL agent needs to learn. Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001, Martha E. Pollack |
ICML | 1 |
| 2004 | Predictive State Representations: A New Theory for Modeling Dynamical Systems
Satinder Singh 0001, Michael R. James 0001, Matthew R. Rudary |
UAI | 3 |
| 2003 | A Nonlinear Predictive State RepresentationabstractPredictive state representations (PSRs) use predictions of a set of tests to represent the state of controlled dynamical systems. One reason why this representation is exciting as an alternative to partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) is that PSR models of dynamical systems may be much more compact than POMDP models. Empirical work on PSRs to date has focused on linear PSRs, which have not allowed for compression relative to POMDPs. We introduce a new notion of tests which allows us to define a new type of PSR that is nonlinear in general and allows for exponential compression in some deterministic dynami- cal systems. These new tests, called e-tests, are related to the tests used by Rivest and Schapire [1] in their work with the diversity representation, but our PSR avoids some of the pitfalls of their representation—in partic- ular, its potential to be exponentially larger than the equivalent POMDP. Matthew R. Rudary, Satinder Singh 0001 |
NIPS | 1 |