Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James F. Kramer

dblp:39/1461 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers
Human-AI interaction · 58% Usability and user experience research · 20% Human-robot interaction · 13%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 28% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28% Robot navigation and mapping · 24%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
affective computing
0.122006
The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human-robot tasks · HRI 2006
Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005
Robotics › Robot manipulation
failure detection and recovery
0.112007
Reflection and Reasoning Mechanisms for Failure Detection and Recovery in a Distributed Robotic Architecture for Complex Robots · ICRA 2007
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction › language-based interaction
natural language interface
0.112006
DIARC: A Testbed for Natural Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2006
Usability and user experience research
testbed
0.112006
DIARC: A Testbed for Natural Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2006
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › affective computing
emotion modeling
0.112005
Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005
Haptics and multimodal interaction
haptic interface
0.012000
The Haptic Interfaces of the Next Decade (Panel) · VR 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reflection and reasoning mechanisms · 0.1affect and cognition architecture · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Reflection and Reasoning Mechanisms for Failure Detection and Recovery in a Distributed Robotic Architecture for Complex Robots
abstract
Complex robots that interact naturally with humans require the integration, coordination and maintenance of many diverse software components and algorithms. An architecture that incorporates explicit knowledge about the relationships among these components and the overall system state can be used for introspection and consequently to reason about the best configurations of the computing environment under changing conditions; potential uses include maintaining the system's integrity, promoting its health, and providing the ability to dynamically reconfigure system components (e.g., after component failure). In this paper, we describe a rudimentary reasoning system, part of our distributed integrated affect reflection cognition (DIARC) architecture for human-robot interaction, that can autonomously perform failure detection, failure recovery, and system reconfiguration of distributed architectural components to ensure sustained operation and interactions. We demonstrate the functionality and utility of the proposed mechanisms on a robot, where architectural components are forcefully removed by hand and automatically recovered by the system while the robot is continuing its interactions with humans as part of a joint human-robot task.
Matthias Scheutz, James F. Kramer
ICRA2
2007 "Talk to me!": enabling communication between robotic architectures and their implementing infrastructures
abstract
Complex, autonomous robots integrate a large set of sometimes very diverse algorithms across at least three levels of system organization: the agent architecture, the implementation environment, and the hardware devices. Insofar as a distinction is maintained between them, the levels serve different purposes and thus exhibit different characteristic strengths and weaknesses. Exchanging information among organizational levels can be used to mitigate the shortcomings of one level by making use of the strengths of another. In this paper, we highlight the roles, characteristics, and relations between the infrastructure and the architecture of complex robots, describing a novel form of integration that results from enabling the exchange of information between these two levels, which otherwise is maintained internally. The information from the infrastructure is especially amenable for use by the architecture to achieve a higher level of robustness and system awareness. We demonstrate the functionality and utility of the proposed mechanisms in a set of experiments in which failures of architectural components are induced on an actual robot engaged in a joint human-robot team task.
James F. Kramer, Matthias Scheutz, Paul W. Schermerhorn
IROS1
2006 DIARC: A Testbed for Natural Human-Robot Interaction
Paul W. Schermerhorn, James F. Kramer, Christopher Middendorff, Matthias Scheutz
AAAI2
2006 The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human-robot tasks
abstract
Recognizing and responding to human affect is important in collaborative tasks in joint human-robot teams. In this paper we present an integrated affect and cognition architecture for HRI and report results from an experiment with this architecture that shows that expressing affect and responding to human affect with affect expressions can significantly improve team performance in a joint human-robot task.
Matthias Scheutz, Paul W. Schermerhorn, James F. Kramer
HRI3
2006 ADE: A Framework for Robust Complex Robotic Architectures
abstract
Robots that can interact naturally with humans require the integration and coordination of many different components with heavy computational demands. We argue that an architecture framework with facilities for dynamic, reliable, fault-recovering, remotely accessible, distributed computing is needed for the development and operation of applications that support and enhance human activities and capabilities. We describe a robotic architecture development system, called ADE, that is built on top of a multi-agent system in order to provide all of the above features. Specifically, we discuss support for autonomic computing in ADE, briefly comparing it to related features of other commonly used robotic systems. We also report our experiences with ADE in the development of an architecture for an intelligent robot assistant and provide experimental results demonstrating the system's utility
James F. Kramer, Matthias Scheutz
IROS1
2005 Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction
Matthias Scheutz, James F. Kramer, Christopher Middendorff, Paul W. Schermerhorn, Michael Heilman, P. Bui
AAAI2
2000 The Haptic Interfaces of the Next Decade (Panel)
Hiroo Iwata, Ryohei Nakatsu, John M. Hollerbach, James F. Kramer, Thomas Massie
VR4