Videos are often used to learn or extract the necessary information to complete tasks in ways different than what text or static imagery can provide. However, many existing agent benchmarks neglect long-context video understanding, instead focus- ing on text or static image inputs. To bridge this gap, we introduce VideoWebArena (VideoWA), a benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of long-context multimodal agents for video understanding. VideoWA consists of 2,021 web agent tasks based on manually crafted video tutorials, which total almost four hours of content. For our benchmark, we define a taxonomy of long-context video-based agent tasks with two main areas of focus: skill retention and factual retention. While skill retention tasks evaluate whether an agent can use a given human demonstration to complete a task efficiently, the factual retention task evaluates whether an agent can retrieve instruction-relevant information from a video to complete a task. We find that the best model achieves a 13.3% success rate on factual retention tasks and 45.8% on factual retention QA pairs—far below human success rates of 73.9% and 79.3%, respectively. On skill retention tasks, long-context models perform worse with tutorials than without, exhibiting a 5% performance decrease in WebArena tasks and a 10.3% decrease in VisualWebArena tasks. Our work highlights performance gaps in the agentic abilities of long-context multimodal models and provides as a testbed for the future development of long-context video agents.

Large language models (LLMs) show potential as computer agents, enhancing productivity and software accessibility in multi-modal tasks. However, measuring agent performance in sufficiently realistic and complex environments becomes increasingly challenging as: (i) most benchmarks are limited to specific modalities/domains (e.g., text-only, web navigation, Q&A) and (ii) full benchmark evaluations are slow (on order of magnitude of multiple hours/days) given the multi-step sequential nature of tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce Windows Agent Arena: a general environment focusing exclusively on the Windows operating system (OS) where agents can operate freely within a real OS to use the same applications and tools available to human users when performing tasks. We create 150+ diverse tasks across representative domains that require agentic abilities in planning, screen understanding, and tool usage. Our benchmark is scalable and can be seamlessly parallelized for a full benchmark evaluation in as little as $20$ minutes. Our work not only speeds up the development and evaluation cycle of multi-modal agents, but also highlights and analyzes existing shortfalls in the agentic abilities of several multimodal LLMs as agents within the Windows computing environment---with the best achieving only a 19.5\% success rate compared to a human success rate of 74.5\%.

We interact with computers on an everyday basis, be it in everyday life or work, and many aspects of work can be done entirely with access to a computer and the Internet. At the same time, thanks to improvements in large language models (LLMs), there has also been a rapid development in AI agents that interact with and affect change in their surrounding environments. But how performant are AI agents at helping to accelerate or even autonomously perform work-related tasks? The answer to this question has important implications for both industry looking to adopt AI into their workflows, and for economic policy to understand the effects that adoption of AI may have on the labor market. To measure the progress of these LLM agents' performance on performing real-world professional tasks, in this paper, we introduce TheAgentCompany, an extensible benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker: by browsing the Web, writing code, running programs, and communicating with other coworkers. We build a self-contained environment with internal web sites and data that mimics a small software company environment, and create a variety of tasks that may be performed by workers in such a company. We test baseline agents powered by both closed API-based and open-weights language models (LMs), and find that with the most competitive agent, 30% of the tasks can be completed autonomously. This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with LM agents -- in a setting simulating a real workplace, a good portion of simpler tasks could be solved autonomously, but more difficult long-horizon tasks are still beyond the reach of current systems. For more information and demos, refer to https://the-agent-company.com.

Jing Yu Koh, Robert Lo, Lawrence Jang, Vikram Duvvur, Ming Lim, Po-Yu Huang, Graham Neubig, Shuyan Zhou, Russ Salakhutdinov, Daniel Fried. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

Advances in multimodal models have greatly improved how interactions relevant to various tasks are modeled.Today's multimodal models mainly focus on the correspondence between images and text, using this for tasks like imagetext matching.However, this covers only a subset of real-world interactions.Novel interactions, such as sarcasm expressed through opposing spoken words and gestures or humor expressed through utterances and tone of voice, remain challenging.In this paper, we introduce an approach to enhance multimodal models, which we call Multimodal Mixtures of Experts (MMOE).The key idea in MMOE is to train separate expert models for each type of multimodal interaction, such as redundancy present in both modalities, uniqueness in one modality, or synergy that emerges when both modalities are fused.On a sarcasm detection task (MUStARD) and a humor detection task (URFunny), we obtain new state-of-the-art results.MMOE is also able to be applied to various types of models to gain improvement.

Large-scale generative language and vision-language models (LLMs and VLMs) excel in few-shot in-context learning for decision making and instruction following. However, they require high-quality exemplar demonstrations to be included in their context window. In this work, we ask: Can LLMs and VLMs generate their own examples from generic, sub-optimal demonstrations? We propose In-Context Abstraction Learning (ICAL), a method that builds a memory of multimodal experience from sub-optimal demonstrations and human feedback. Given a task demonstration that may contain inefficiencies or mistakes, a VLM abstracts the trajectory into a generalized program by correcting inefficient actions and annotating cognitive abstractions: causal relationships, object state changes, temporal subgoals, and task-relevant visual elements. These abstractions are iteratively improved and adapted through human feedback while the agent attempts to execute the trajectory in a similar environment. The resulting examples, when used as exemplars in the prompt, significantly improve decision-making in retrieval-augmented LLM and VLM agents. Moreover, as the agent's library of examples grows, it becomes more efficient, relying less on human feedback and requiring fewer environment interactions per demonstration. Our ICAL agent surpasses the state-of-the-art in dialogue-based instruction following in TEACh, multimodal web agents in VisualWebArena, and action anticipation in Ego4D. In TEACh, we achieve a 12.6% improvement in goal-condition success. In VisualWebArena, our task success rate improves over the SOTA from 14.3% to 22.7% using GPT4V. In Ego4D action forecasting, we improve over few-shot GPT-4V and remain competitive with supervised models. We show finetuning our retrieval-augmented in-context agent yields additional improvements. Our approach significantly reduces reliance on manual prompt engineering and consistently outperforms in-context learning from action plans that lack such abstractions.