Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abdullah Mazhar
dblp:398/3151
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4654-881XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Language models and text generation · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
commonsense knowledge integration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Figurative-cum-Commonsense Knowledge Infusion for Multimodal Mental Health Meme Classification · WWW 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › figurative language processing
figurative language understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Figurative-cum-Commonsense Knowledge Infusion for Multimodal Mental Health Meme Classification · WWW 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
toxicity reduction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Redefining Experts: Interpretable Decomposition of Language Models for Toxicity Mitigation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Redefining Experts: Interpretable Decomposition of Language Models for Toxicity Mitigation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
layer-wise representation analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Redefining Experts: Interpretable Decomposition of Language Models for Toxicity Mitigation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Health and well-being technologies › mental health technology
mental health monitoring |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Figurative-cum-Commonsense Knowledge Infusion for Multimodal Mental Health Meme Classification · WWW 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
domain enrichment · 1.7commonsense knowledge · 1.7large language model evaluation · 1.0neuron activation analysis · 0.9multimodal language models · 0.9multimodal language model · 0.9eigendecomposition · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Measuring What Matters!! Assessing Therapeutic Principles in Mental-Health ConversationabstractAbdullah Mazhar, Het Riteshkumar Shah, Aseem Srivastava, Smriti Joshi, Md Shad Akhtar. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Abdullah Mazhar, Het Riteshkumar Shah, Aseem Srivastava, Smriti Joshi, Md. Shad Akhtar |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Redefining Experts: Interpretable Decomposition of Language Models for Toxicity MitigationabstractLarge Language Models have demonstrated impressive fluency across diverse tasks, yet their tendency to produce toxic content remains a critical challenge for AI safety and public trust. Existing toxicity mitigation approaches primarily manipulate individual neuron activations, but these methods suffer from instability, context dependence, and often compromise the model’s core language abilities. To address these shortcomings, we investigate three key questions: the stability of neuron-level toxicity indicators, the advantages of structural (layer-wise) representations, and the interpretability of mechanisms driving toxic generation. Through extensive experiments on Jigsaw and ToxiCN datasets, we show that aggregated layer-wise features provide more robust signals than single neurons. Moreover, we observe conceptual limitations in prior works that conflate toxicity detection experts and generation experts within neuron-based interventions. To mitigate this, we propose a novel principled intervention technique, EigenShift, based on eigen-decomposition of the language model’s final output layer. This method selectively targets generation-aligned components, enabling precise toxicity suppression without impairing linguistic competence. Our method requires no additional training or fine-tuning, incurs minimal computational cost, and is grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis. Zuhair Hasan Shaik, Abdullah Mazhar, Aseem Srivastava, Md. Shad Akhtar |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Figurative-cum-Commonsense Knowledge Infusion for Multimodal Mental Health Meme ClassificationabstractThe expression of mental health symptoms through non-traditional means, such as memes, has gained remarkable attention over the past few years, with users often highlighting their mental health struggles through figurative intricacies within memes. While humans rely on commonsense knowledge to interpret these complex expressions, current Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) struggle to capture these figurative aspects inherent in memes. To address this gap, we introduce a novel dataset, AxiOM, derived from the GAD anxiety questionnaire, which categorizes memes into six fine-grained anxiety symptoms. Next, we propose a commonsense and domain-enriched framework, M3H, to enhance MLMs' ability to interpret figurative language and commonsense knowledge. The overarching goal remains to first understand and then classify the mental health symptoms expressed in memes. We benchmark M3H against 6 competitive baselines (with 20 variations), demonstrating improvements in both quantitative and qualitative metrics, including a detailed human evaluation. We observe a clear improvement of 4.20% and 4.66% on weighted-F1 metric. To assess the generalizability, we perform extensive experiments on a public dataset, RESTORE, for depressive symptom identification, presenting an ablation study that highlights the contribution of each module. Our findings reveal limitations in existing models and the advantage of employing commonsense to enhance figurative understanding. Abdullah Mazhar, Zuhair Hasan Shaik, Aseem Srivastava, Polly Ruhnke, Lavanya Vaddavalli, Sri Keshav Katragadda, Shweta Yadav 0001, Md. Shad Akhtar |
WWW | 1 |