Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Ann Chapman

dblp:40/5864 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Data integration and cleaning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
digital libraries		 0.012006
Personalization and accessibility: integration of library and web approaches · WWW 2006
Data integration and cleaning
interoperability		 0.012006
Personalization and accessibility: integration of library and web approaches · WWW 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metadata standards · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Personalization and accessibility: integration of library and web approaches
abstract
This paper describes personalization metadata standards that can be used to enable individuals to access and use resources based on a user's particular requirements. The paper describes two approaches which are being developed in the library and Web worlds and highlights some of the potential challenges which will need to be addressed in order to maximise interoperability. The paper concludes by arguing the need for greater dialogue across these two communities.
Ann Chapman, Brian Kelly, Liddy Nevile, Andy Heath
 WWW1