Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Abram
dblp:402/3433
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 50% Human-robot interaction · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning and educational technologies
personalized learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025 |
Human-robot interaction › educational robotics
social robot tutoring |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025 |
Learning and educational technologies
early childhood education |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025 |
Human-robot interaction
social robot |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pre-post testing · 0.9engagement evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood EducationabstractThe lack of personalization in early education can often leave students with weak foundational skills, causing said students to be behind in their studies. Personalized learning, the idea of tailoring a unique lesson plan to a student, has been shown to improve the understanding of content learned. Robots utilizing personalization techniques in educational settings, coined social robots, have been able to form a connection with students, thereby keeping them engaged while learning. This proposal seeks to study the effects of AI-driven social robotic tutors coupled with personalized learning on early childhood education. The study will consist of five groups of K-4 students: two groups learning while utilizing both a social robot and a tablet (one group with personalized learning and the other without), the two groups interacting with only the tablet (with and without personalization), and the last group learning utilizing both a non-personalized learning tablet and a non-social robot. This study aims to determine whether the combination of robotic interaction and personalized learning leads to better outcomes than solely tablet-based or non-personalized methods. This study will focus on teaching mathematics to the participants. Pre and post-tests will measure learning progress, and the influence of robot interaction on student engagement will also be evaluated. It is expected that the students with social robotic tutors and personalized learning tablets will show the greatest knowledge retention, outperforming all other categories. These findings could have significant implications for the integration of AI and robotics in early education, potentially revolutionizing how personalized learning is implemented therefore improving educational outcomes for young learners. Nicholas Abram |
AAAI | 1 |