Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicholas Abram

dblp:402/3433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 50% Human-robot interaction · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Learning and educational technologies
personalized learning
0.912025
Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025
Human-robot interaction › educational robotics
social robot tutoring
0.912025
Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025
Learning and educational technologies
early childhood education
0.312025
Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025
Human-robot interaction
social robot
0.312025
Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pre-post testing · 0.9engagement evaluation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Personalized Learning in Action: Exploring AI and Robotics for Early Childhood Education
abstract
The lack of personalization in early education can often leave students with weak foundational skills, causing said students to be behind in their studies. Personalized learning, the idea of tailoring a unique lesson plan to a student, has been shown to improve the understanding of content learned. Robots utilizing personalization techniques in educational settings, coined social robots, have been able to form a connection with students, thereby keeping them engaged while learning. This proposal seeks to study the effects of AI-driven social robotic tutors coupled with personalized learning on early childhood education. The study will consist of five groups of K-4 students: two groups learning while utilizing both a social robot and a tablet (one group with personalized learning and the other without), the two groups interacting with only the tablet (with and without personalization), and the last group learning utilizing both a non-personalized learning tablet and a non-social robot. This study aims to determine whether the combination of robotic interaction and personalized learning leads to better outcomes than solely tablet-based or non-personalized methods. This study will focus on teaching mathematics to the participants. Pre and post-tests will measure learning progress, and the influence of robot interaction on student engagement will also be evaluated. It is expected that the students with social robotic tutors and personalized learning tablets will show the greatest knowledge retention, outperforming all other categories. These findings could have significant implications for the integration of AI and robotics in early education, potentially revolutionizing how personalized learning is implemented therefore improving educational outcomes for young learners.
Nicholas Abram
AAAI1