Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dana Feng
dblp:402/4620
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-7492-1622ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 88% Collaborative and social computing · 12% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
AI for software engineering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering · CHI 2026 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software Engineering · CHI 2026 |
Collaborative and social computing › cooperative work
group decision-making |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Design Implications for Data Navigation and Decision-Making · CHI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-methods study · 2.0delphi process · 2.0blind reviews · 2.0ACTA · 2.0user study · 0.9design probe · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | From Junior to Senior: Allocating Agency and Navigating Professional Growth in Agentic AI-Mediated Software EngineeringabstractJuniors enter as AI‑natives, seniors adapted mid‑career. AI is not just changing how engineers code—it is reshaping who holds agency across work and professional growth. We contribute junior–senior accounts on their usage of agentic AI through a three-phase mixed-methods study: ACTA combined with a Delphi process with 5 seniors, an AI-assisted debugging task with 10 juniors, and blind reviews of junior prompt histories by 5 more seniors. We found that agency in software engineering is primarily constrained by organizational policies rather than individual preferences, with experienced developers maintaining control through detailed delegation while novices struggle between over-reliance and cautious avoidance. Seniors leverage pre-AI foundational instincts to steer modern tools and possess valuable perspectives for mentoring juniors in their early AI-encouraged career development. From synthesis of results, we suggest three practices that focus on preserving agency in software engineering for coding, learning, and mentorship, especially as AI grows increasingly autonomous. Dana Feng, Bhada Yun, April Yi Wang |
CHI | 1 |
| 2025 | Generative AI in Knowledge Work: Design Implications for Data Navigation and Decision-MakingabstractOur study of 20 knowledge workers revealed a common challenge: the difficulty of synthesizing unstructured information scattered across multiple platforms to make informed decisions. Drawing on their vision of an ideal knowledge synthesis tool, we developed Yodeai, an AI-enabled system, to explore both the opportunities and limitations of AI in knowledge work. Through a user study with 16 product managers, we identified three key requirements for Generative AI in knowledge work: adaptable user control, transparent collaboration mechanisms, and the ability to integrate background knowledge with external information. However, we also found significant limitations, including overreliance on AI, user isolation, and contextual factors outside the AI's reach. As AI tools become increasingly prevalent in professional settings, we propose design principles that emphasize adaptability to diverse workflows, accountability in personal and collaborative contexts, and context-aware interoperability to guide the development of human-centered AI systems for product managers and knowledge workers. Bhada Yun, Dana Feng, Ace S. Chen, Afshin Nikzad, Niloufar Salehi |
CHI | 2 |