Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joshua Gabriel Speckels
dblp:402/9056
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-3500-8566ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Usable security · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usable security › security behavior
developer security behavior |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | "The AI tool can't make it any worse." Investigating Developers' Security Behavior with AI Assistants in a Password Storage Study · CHI 2026 |
Collaborative and social computing › team collaboration
software development teams |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Women Security Experts Are Not The Enemy: A Qualitative Study on Gender-Related Communication Challenges · CHI 2025 |
Requirements engineering and software design › non-functional requirements
security requirements |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Women Security Experts Are Not The Enemy: A Qualitative Study on Gender-Related Communication Challenges · CHI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative study · 2.6interview study · 2.6quantitative online study · 1.0qualitative lab study · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | "The AI tool can't make it any worse." Investigating Developers' Security Behavior with AI Assistants in a Password Storage StudyabstractPast research showed that software developers often require explicit instructions to implement security measures. With the rapid rise of AI assistant tools such as ChatGPT, it remains unclear whether AI assistance supports or undermines secure practices, whether explicit security instructions are still essential, and how developers behave without guidance. To investigate these research questions, we conducted a qualitative lab study with 21 computer science students and a quantitative online study with 80 freelance developers. We focused on secure password storage and asked participants to implement registration logic under four conditions: without instructions, with AI assistance, with security instructions, or with both AI assistance and security instructions. Our study reveals a clear behavioral shift: In our task, many participants relied on AI-assisted code generation for security-related tasks, often prioritizing convenience over security. However, explicit security-focused instructions can redirect this behavior toward secure outcomes, demonstrating that AI tools alone are insufficient without targeted guidance. Asli Yardim, Raphael Serafini, Nadine Jost, Anna-Marie Ortloff, Joshua Gabriel Speckels, Alena Naiakshina |
CHI | 5 |
| 2025 | Women Security Experts Are Not The Enemy: A Qualitative Study on Gender-Related Communication ChallengesabstractEffective communication is crucial for meeting security needs, yet gender-related communication challenges faced by women security experts within software development remain underexplored.In an interview study with 25 women security experts, we investigated gender-related communication challenges hindering the adoption of security requirements, and strategies to overcome these.Key challenges included the undervaluation of women's security expertise, communication barriers, resistance to women's security-related suggestions, and instances of hostility.Communication challenges with stakeholders who were men disrupted team collaboration, resulting in delays, weakened security measures, and increased organizational risk.Consequently, women security experts often had to adopt strategies, such as leveraging allied men and overpreparing, to assert their security competence.We further offer insights into women's participation in security studies.Based on our findings, we provide recommendations on how to address gender-related challenges. Asli Yardim, Stefan Horstmann, Raphael Serafini, Joshua Gabriel Speckels, Alena Naiakshina |
CHI | 4 |