Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yelu Gu

dblp:402/9569 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-5317-9467ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Face, body and person analysis · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
allocative harm
1.012026
Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Allocative Harms in Facial-Gesture Recognition for People with Motor Impairments · CHI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.012026
Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Allocative Harms in Facial-Gesture Recognition for People with Motor Impairments · CHI 2026
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing
gesture recognition
1.012026
Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Allocative Harms in Facial-Gesture Recognition for People with Motor Impairments · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory-based motion analysis · 2.0perception gap metric · 2.0mixed-methods study · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Allocative Harms in Facial-Gesture Recognition for People with Motor Impairments
abstract
Camera-based facial-gesture interfaces offer hands-free access for people with motor impairments (PwM), yet most recognition models are trained on able-bodied data and implicitly assume normative motor control and proprioception. We conducted a mixed-methods empirical study of 37 above-neck gestures performed by 11 PwM and 11 non-impaired participants. Results reveal systematic mismatches between user intention and model recognition in the PwM group, stemming from diverse patterns of body perception and control and leading to allocative harms. These mismatches concentrated in low-amplitude, asymmetric, and directional gestures. Building on these findings, we introduce FairGesture, a diagnostic auditing method for quantifying and interpreting such mismatches. FairGesture combines (1) the Perception Gap metric, (2) trajectory-based motion analysis, and (3) an analysis of user sensorimotor feedback, exploring the reasons behind these mismatches. The work reframes accuracy in gesture recognition as a problem of sensorimotor alignment, advancing user-centred evaluation and inclusive model design.
Yelu Gu, Kirsten Cater, Oussama Metatla
CHI2