Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shane T. King

dblp:404/4683 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7187-7043ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 61% Human-robot interaction · 30% Wearable and physiological sensing · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
assistive technology
0.712023
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis · ICRA 2023
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.712023
A method for selecting stumble recovery response in a knee exoskeleton · ICRA 2023
Human-robot interaction › wearable robot
exoskeleton
0.712023
A method for selecting stumble recovery response in a knee exoskeleton · ICRA 2023
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
lower limb exoskeleton
0.712023
A method for selecting stumble recovery response in a knee exoskeleton · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
real-time control
0.212023
A method for selecting stumble recovery response in a knee exoskeleton · ICRA 2023
Wearable and physiological sensing
gait analysis
0.212023
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

swing-assist control · 1.3stumble detection · 1.3reflex-based control · 1.3recovery strategy identification · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A method for selecting stumble recovery response in a knee exoskeleton
abstract
Powered lower-limb exoskeletons have been shown to assist and augment walking, but most such devices do not currently have the ability to explicitly accommodate a stumble perturbation. A major challenge in doing so is identifying a stumble event and selecting in real-time which recovery strategy (elevating or lowering) to employ, particularly since the exoskeleton should ideally select the same strategy selected by the user. In order to do so, the authors conducted experiments involving five young, healthy adults wearing a knee exoskeleton. Each participant underwent a stumble experiment in order to collect an exoskeleton sensor dataset of stumbles throughout swing phase, which was used for stumble detection and recovery strategy identification algorithm development and testing. Overall, the proposed detection and identification algorithms provide improved accuracy with fewer required sensors relative to previous works, and were tested on the largest exoskeleton sensor stumble dataset to date, showing the feasibility of such algorithms for real-time implementation, which is an essential first step in developing lower-limb assistive devices that are robust to stumbles.
Maura Eveld, Shane T. King, Karl E. Zelik, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA2
2023 A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Active Recovery Reflexes on Stumble Recovery in a Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis
abstract
This paper explores the effects of a swing phase stumble recovery controller in a swing-assist prosthesis. The prosthesis detects a stumble event and employs either a lowering recovery response - wherein the user's swing is truncated, and the leg is prepared for loading- or an elevating recovery response - wherein an amplified swing flexion is employed to step over the obstacle causing the perturbation. The controller described in this paper choses which of these responses to use based on the perturbation timing within the gait cycle, where stumble events which occur prior to an estimated 35 percent of the way through swing trigger an elevating response, and later stumbles trigger a lowering response. The potential efficacy of this approach was assessed in a preliminary study with two participants with transfemoral amputation; wherein each participant's walking was perturbed in early, mid, and late swing phase when wearing both their prescribed prosthesis and the swing-assist prosthesis prototype. When wearing the swing- assist device, 0 of the 13 perturbations resulted in falls, with none of the trials being classifiable as “near falls”. Conversely, when using their prescribed device, one participant had a fall rate of 3 out of 6 perturbations, with 1 of the 3 recoveries being classifiable as a “near fall”; the second participant had a fall rate of 0 of 3 trials, with 2 of the 3 recoveries being classifiable as “near falls”. For both participants, when recovery was achieved, it was accompanied by significantly longer periods of irregularity and asymmetry in gait when using their prescribed devices, as compared to the test device. These results suggest the possibility of substantial benefit provided by a low-power, reflex- based stumble recovery feature in knee prostheses.
Jantzen T. Lee, Shane T. King, Maura Eveld, Michael Goldfarb
ICRA2
2021 Design and implementation of a stumble recovery controller for a knee exoskeleton
abstract
This paper presents a stumble recovery controller for a knee exoskeleton that detects a stumble perturbation; selects an anticipated recovery strategy; and provides appropriate recovery assistance. In order to assess the efficacy of the controller in providing an assistive response to a stumble perturbation, the controller was implemented in a knee exoskeleton and evaluated in a single healthy adult participant against several other controller reactions, and against the participant’s response without an exoskeleton. Results show that the stumble recovery controller successfully detected the perturbation and correctly selected the strategy that matched the participant’s response for all 29 trials in which the exoskeleton was used. Further, results show improvements in stumble recovery metrics when using the exoskeleton with the stumble recovery controller, compared to the control cases of: 1) no change in the nominal controller when stumble is detected; 2) turning off exoskeleton torque when a stumble is detected; and 3) not wearing an exoskeleton.
Maura Eveld, Shane T. King, Karl E. Zelik, Michael Goldfarb
IROS2