Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Victoria Coralie Kuch

dblp:404/5769 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-0895-9764ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 87% Accessibility and assistive technology · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
nonverbal communication
0.912025
A Socially Mediating Robot to Assist Non-Verbal Children in an Inclusive Daycare Context · HRI 2025
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
socially assistive robotics
0.912025
A Socially Mediating Robot to Assist Non-Verbal Children in an Inclusive Daycare Context · HRI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Socially Mediating Robot to Assist Non-Verbal Children in an Inclusive Daycare Context
abstract
Non-verbal children are often provided with non-verbal communication cards (NVCCs) to share their needs. However, in busy spaces that prioritize verbal communication, for example, a daycare, this may place them at a disadvantage in comparison with verbal peers. In this work, we introduce the concept of a Socially Mediating Robot (SMR), acting as a communicational intermediary that verbalizes NVCC input. Thereby, we want to explore whether non-verbal children can be empowered by giving them an additional way of expressing themselves in a dynamic, buzzing environment. In an exploratory interview study with six participants professionally working with children, we then provide first insights on the feasibility of our concept from the perspective of caregiving staff. Thereby, we lay the groundwork for evaluating the concept in an ongoing field study in an inclusive daycare context.
Jan Rixen, Rafik Abdalla, Victoria Coralie Kuch, Nadja Scherer, Barbara Bruno, Kathrin Maria Gerling
HRI3