Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc J. Fischer
dblp:415/1676
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Virtual and augmented reality · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AR Surgical Navigation with Surface Tracing: Comparing In-Situ Visualization with Tool-Tracking Guidance for Neurosurgical Applications · ISMAR 2025 |
Virtual and augmented reality › navigation
surgical navigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AR Surgical Navigation with Surface Tracing: Comparing In-Situ Visualization with Tool-Tracking Guidance for Neurosurgical Applications · ISMAR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system usability scale · 1.7surface tracing · 1.7infrared tool tracking · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AR Surgical Navigation with Surface Tracing: Comparing In-Situ Visualization with Tool-Tracking Guidance for Neurosurgical ApplicationsabstractAugmented Reality (AR) surgical navigation systems are emerging as the next generation of intraoperative surgical guidance, promising to overcome limitations of traditional navigation systems. However, known issues with AR depth perception due to vergenceaccommodation conflict and occlusion handling limitations of the currently commercially available display technology present acute challenges in surgical settings where precision is paramount. This study presents a novel methodology for utilizing AR guidance to register anatomical targets and provide real-time instrument navigation using placement of simulated external ventricular drain catheters on a phantom model as the clinical scenario. The system registers target positions to the patient through a novel surface tracing method and uses real-time infrared tool tracking to aid in catheter placement, relying only on the onboard sensors of the Microsoft HoloLens 2. A group of intended users performed the procedure of simulated insertions under two AR guidance conditions: static in-situ visualization, where planned trajectories are overlaid directly onto the patient anatomy, and real-time tool-tracking guidance, where live feedback of the catheter's pose is provided relative to the plan. Following the insertion tests, computed tomography scans of the phantom models were acquired, allowing for evaluation of insertion accuracy, target deviation, angular error, and depth precision. System Usability Scale surveys assessed user experience and cognitive workload. Tool-tracking guidance improved performance metrics across all accuracy measures and was preferred by users in subjective evaluations. Marc J. Fischer, E. Brandon Strong |
ISMAR | 1 |