Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kimberley Paradis

dblp:433/0977 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-2419-4773ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Design research and methods · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 12% Human-AI interaction · 12%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
feminist HCI
1.012026
LLooM: Weaving Stories and Probing Experiences of Language Technologies · CHI 2026
Design research and methods
speculative design
1.012026
Speculative Performance: Staging Intergenerational Speculation to Explore Critical Literacies of Technological Futures · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

storytelling · 1.0probe deployment · 1.0performance-based methods · 1.0participatory design · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Speculative Performance: Staging Intergenerational Speculation to Explore Critical Literacies of Technological Futures
abstract
This paper presents speculative performance as an approach for engaging participants in imagining, enacting, and reflecting on technological futures through a combination of speculative design, performance, and intergenerational engagement. While speculative and performance-based methods are well established in HCI, there has been limited exploration of how these practices might explore critical technological literacies across generations. To investigate this, we ran two five-day workshops with approximately 30 older adults and young people, who collaboratively created speculative artefacts and dramatic scenes of technological futures, which culminated in a final public performance. We demonstrate how speculative performance can foster critical literacies of digital technologies and data by enabling participants to embody technological issues, move from technological malfunction to social and relational implications, and imagine alternative futures. We reflect on the opportunities and challenges of speculative performance and argue that this methodological approach expands how HCI imagines, critiques and performs technological futures with intergenerational communities.
Tara Capel, Kimberley Paradis, Peter Bentley, Ryan McKay, Rupert Goodwins, Willy Barr, Clare Duffy
CHI3
2026 LLooM: Weaving Stories and Probing Experiences of Language Technologies
abstract
This paper presents LLooM, a probe designed to capture situated, temporal, and contradictory experiences with language technologies such as voice assistants, chatbots, and LLMs. The design of LLooM draws on work in probes, feminist HCI, and storytelling to invite participants to write stories about their encounters with language technologies on fabric strips and weave them into looms. Through a public, researcher-facilitated, and collective participant deployment with 56 participants, LLooM enabled participants to share diverse perspectives on language technologies. This methodological approach makes two contributions to probe design in HCI: enabling participants to reshape the methodological assumptions underlying research and allowing participants' visible contributions to become provocations that support collaborative meaning-making across diverse experiences.
Kimberley Paradis, Lachlan Urquhart, Tara Capel
CHI1