VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Somay Jalan
dblp:434/8027
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wearable and physiological sensing
emotion recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FEEL: Quantifying Heterogeneity in Physiological Signals for Generalizable Emotion Recognition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › emotion recognition
physiological signal-based emotion recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FEEL: Quantifying Heterogeneity in Physiological Signals for Generalizable Emotion Recognition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
model generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FEEL: Quantifying Heterogeneity in Physiological Signals for Generalizable Emotion Recognition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised pretraining · 1.7contrastive signal-language pretraining · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FEEL: Quantifying Heterogeneity in Physiological Signals for Generalizable Emotion RecognitionabstractEmotion recognition from physiological signals has substantial potential for applications in mental health and emotion-aware systems. However, the lack of standardized, large-scale evaluations across heterogeneous datasets limits progress and model generalization. We introduce FEEL (Framework for Emotion Evaluation), the first large-scale benchmarking study of emotion recognition usingelectrodermal activity (EDA) and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals across 19 publicly available datasets. We evaluate 16 architectures spanning traditional machine learning, deep learning, and self-supervised pretraining approaches, structured into four representative modeling paradigms. Our study includes both within-dataset and cross-dataset evaluations, analyzing generalization across variations in experimental settings, device types, and labeling strategies. Our results showed that fine-tuned contrastive signal-language pretraining (CLSP) models (71/114) achieve the highest F1 across arousal and valence classification tasks, while simpler models like Random Forests, LDA, and MLP remain competitive (36/114). Models leveraging handcrafted features (107/114) consistently outperform those trained on raw signal segments, underscoring the value of domain knowledge in low-resource, noisy settings. Further cross-dataset analyses reveal that models trained on real-life setting data generalize well to lab (F1 = 0.79) and constraint-based settings (F1 = 0.78). Similarly, models trained on expert-annotated data transfer effectively to stimulus-labeled (F1 = 0.72) and self-reported datasets (F1 = 0.76). Moreover, models trained on lab-based devices also demonstrated high transferability to both custom wearable devices (F1 = 0.81) and the Empatica E4 (F1 = 0.73), underscoring the influence of heterogeneity. Overall, FEEL provides a unified framework for benchmarking physiological emotion recognition, delivering insights to guide the development of generalizable emotion-aware technologies. Code implementationis available at https://github.com/alchemy18/FEEL. More information about FEEL can be found on our website https://alchemy18.github.io/FEEL_Benchmark/. Pragya Singh, Somay Jalan, Mohan Kumar, Pushpendra Singh 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |