Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omar Zaidan

dblp:45/1280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Machine translation · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Reinforcement learning · 18%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
crowdsourced translation
0.112011
Crowdsourcing Translation: Professional Quality from Non-Professionals · ACL 2011
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › training criteria
minimum error rate training
0.112009
Feasibility of Human-in-the-loop Minimum Error Rate Training · EMNLP 2009
Human-AI interaction
human-in-the-loop
0.112009
Feasibility of Human-in-the-loop Minimum Error Rate Training · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
annotator rationales
0.112008
Modeling Annotators: A Generative Approach to Learning from Annotator Rationales · EMNLP 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback
0.112008
Modeling Annotators: A Generative Approach to Learning from Annotator Rationales · EMNLP 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimum error rate training · 0.2generative modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Arabic Dialect Identification
abstract
The written form of the Arabic language, Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), differs in a non-trivial manner from the various spoken regional dialects of Arabic—the true “native languages” of Arabic speakers. Those dialects, in turn, differ quite a bit from each other. However, due to MSA's prevalence in written form, almost all Arabic data sets have predominantly MSA content. In this article, we describe the creation of a novel Arabic resource with dialect annotations. We have created a large monolingual data set rich in dialectal Arabic content called the Arabic On-line Commentary Data set (Zaidan and Callison-Burch 2011). We describe our annotation effort to identify the dialect level (and dialect itself) in each of more than 100,000 sentences from the data set by crowdsourcing the annotation task, and delve into interesting annotator behaviors (like over-identification of one's own dialect). Using this new annotated data set, we consider the task of Arabic dialect identification: Given the word sequence forming an Arabic sentence, determine the variety of Arabic in which it is written. We use the data to train and evaluate automatic classifiers for dialect identification, and establish that classifiers using dialectal data significantly and dramatically outperform baselines that use MSA-only data, achieving near-human classification accuracy. Finally, we apply our classifiers to discover dialectical data from a large Web crawl consisting of 3.5 million pages mined from on-line Arabic newspapers.
Omar Zaidan, Chris Callison-Burch
Comput. Linguistics1
2012 Machine Translation of Arabic Dialects
Rabih Zbib, Erika Malchiodi, Jacob Devlin, David Stallard, Spyridon Matsoukas, Richard M. Schwartz, John Makhoul, Omar Zaidan, Chris Callison-Burch
HLT-NAACL8
2011 Crowdsourcing Translation: Professional Quality from Non-Professionals
Omar Zaidan, Chris Callison-Burch
ACL1
2010 Predicting Human-Targeted Translation Edit Rate via Untrained Human Annotators
Omar Zaidan, Chris Callison-Burch
HLT-NAACL1
2009 Feasibility of Human-in-the-loop Minimum Error Rate Training
Omar Zaidan, Chris Callison-Burch
EMNLP1
2008 Modeling Annotators: A Generative Approach to Learning from Annotator Rationales
Omar Zaidan, Jason Eisner
EMNLP1
2007 Using "Annotator Rationales" to Improve Machine Learning for Text Categorization
Omar Zaidan, Jason Eisner, Christine D. Piatko
HLT-NAACL1