Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xin Lin 0006

dblp:50/3323-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8077-5134ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 46% Accessibility and assistive technology · 40% Learning and educational technologies · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › programming education
block-based programming
1.012026
Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and Practices · CHI 2026
Computing education
programming education
1.012026
Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and Practices · CHI 2026
Usable security
online safety
0.912025
Digital Safety for Children with Intellectual Disabilities When Using Mobile Devices from Parents' and Teachers' Perspectives · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 3.7workshop study · 2.0interview study · 2.0semi-structured interviews · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and Practices
abstract
Recent advances in generative AI have introduced a new programming paradigm—vibe coding, a natural language–driven mode of AI collaboration. While promising for adults, little is known about how children engage with this approach, especially in block-based environments. To explore this gap, we conducted workshops with children of varying Scratch experience (n=41) and interviewed five Scratch teachers. Our study investigates how vibe coding impacts children’s programming learning and practice, and what challenges arise. Findings show that vibe coding has both positive and negative impacts across three key contexts of children’s programming experience: acquisition, application, and creation. Across the stages of vibe coding—goal articulation, information interpretation, and outcome evaluation—children encounter distinct challenges. By examining the mismatches between core assumptions of vibe coding and children’s needs, and analyzing its applicability across different contexts, we offer child-centered design implications for future vibe coding systems and GenAI tools.
Janice Jianing Si, Qiuning Wang, Alicia Wanyi Liu, Xin Lin 0006, Yujun Zhu, Xiaobo Zhou 0002, April Yi Wang, Kanye Ye Wang
CHI5
2025 Digital Safety for Children with Intellectual Disabilities When Using Mobile Devices from Parents' and Teachers' Perspectives
abstract
As mobile devices become increasingly integrated into children's daily lives, digital safety has emerged as a pressing concern, particularly for children with intellectual disabilities (ID), who are more vulnerable due to their cognitive and behavioral challenges. Despite their heightened risk, little research has addressed the unique digital safety issues these children face. To bridge this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with parents and special education teachers who are key figures for overseeing the digital access and safety of children with ID. Our findings highlight four primary concerns: imitation of harmful behaviors, accidental misoperation of devices, risks from fraud, and exposure to cyberbullying. To address these, parents and teachers largely rely on proactive educational strategies supported by technical controls and device restrictions. We conclude by emphasizing the need to adapt special education practices to the evolving digital landscape and propose inclusive safety strategies applicable to other at-risk user groups.
Janice Jianing Si, Xin Lin 0006, Haorui Cui, Xiaobo Zhou 0002, Kanye Ye Wang
CCS2