Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xin Lin 0006
dblp:50/3323-6
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8077-5134ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 46% Accessibility and assistive technology · 40% Learning and educational technologies · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Usable security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education › programming education
block-based programming |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and Practices · CHI 2026 |
Computing education
programming education |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and Practices · CHI 2026 |
Usable security
online safety |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Digital Safety for Children with Intellectual Disabilities When Using Mobile Devices from Parents' and Teachers' Perspectives · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative analysis · 3.7workshop study · 2.0interview study · 2.0semi-structured interviews · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Exploring the Impacts and Challenges of Vibe Coding Paradigm to Children's Programming Learning and PracticesabstractRecent advances in generative AI have introduced a new programming paradigm—vibe coding, a natural language–driven mode of AI collaboration. While promising for adults, little is known about how children engage with this approach, especially in block-based environments. To explore this gap, we conducted workshops with children of varying Scratch experience (n=41) and interviewed five Scratch teachers. Our study investigates how vibe coding impacts children’s programming learning and practice, and what challenges arise. Findings show that vibe coding has both positive and negative impacts across three key contexts of children’s programming experience: acquisition, application, and creation. Across the stages of vibe coding—goal articulation, information interpretation, and outcome evaluation—children encounter distinct challenges. By examining the mismatches between core assumptions of vibe coding and children’s needs, and analyzing its applicability across different contexts, we offer child-centered design implications for future vibe coding systems and GenAI tools. Janice Jianing Si, Qiuning Wang, Alicia Wanyi Liu, Xin Lin 0006, Yujun Zhu, Xiaobo Zhou 0002, April Yi Wang, Kanye Ye Wang |
CHI | 5 |
| 2025 | Digital Safety for Children with Intellectual Disabilities When Using Mobile Devices from Parents' and Teachers' PerspectivesabstractAs mobile devices become increasingly integrated into children's daily lives, digital safety has emerged as a pressing concern, particularly for children with intellectual disabilities (ID), who are more vulnerable due to their cognitive and behavioral challenges. Despite their heightened risk, little research has addressed the unique digital safety issues these children face. To bridge this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with parents and special education teachers who are key figures for overseeing the digital access and safety of children with ID. Our findings highlight four primary concerns: imitation of harmful behaviors, accidental misoperation of devices, risks from fraud, and exposure to cyberbullying. To address these, parents and teachers largely rely on proactive educational strategies supported by technical controls and device restrictions. We conclude by emphasizing the need to adapt special education practices to the evolving digital landscape and propose inclusive safety strategies applicable to other at-risk user groups. Janice Jianing Si, Xin Lin 0006, Haorui Cui, Xiaobo Zhou 0002, Kanye Ye Wang |
CCS | 2 |