Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhicheng Zheng
dblp:50/9014
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9235-9074ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 23% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Reinforcement learning · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 33% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33% Image and video coding · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › autonomous agents
mobile agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | InquireMobile: Teaching VLM-based Mobile Agent to Request Human Assistance via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | InquireMobile: Teaching VLM-based Mobile Agent to Request Human Assistance via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
error detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
factuality evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Chinese SimpleQA: A Chinese Factuality Evaluation for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing › video generation
text-to-video generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VC4VG: Optimizing Video Captions for Text-to-Video Generation · EMNLP 2025 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video captioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VC4VG: Optimizing Video Captions for Text-to-Video Generation · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from Videos · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
physical commonsense reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from Videos · ICML 2024 |
Computational complexity › property testing
distribution testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | New Lower Bounds for Testing Monotonicity and Log Concavity of Distributions · COLT 2024 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | New Lower Bounds for Testing Monotonicity and Log Concavity of Distributions · COLT 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | InquireMobile: Teaching VLM-based Mobile Agent to Request Human Assistance via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement fine-tuning · 2.0fine-tuning · 0.9particle-based physical dynamic models · 0.8moment matching · 0.8large language model · 0.8ensemble construction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | InquireMobile: Teaching VLM-based Mobile Agent to Request Human Assistance via Reinforcement Fine-TuningabstractQihang Ai, Pi Bu, Yue Cao, Yingyao Wang, Jihao Gu, Jingxuan Xing, Zekun Zhu, Wei Jiang, Zhicheng Zheng, Jun Song, Yuning Jiang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Qihang Ai, Pi Bu, Yingyao Wang, Jihao Gu, Jingxuan Xing, Zekun Zhu, Zhicheng Zheng, Yuning Jiang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 9 |
| 2025 | Chinese SimpleQA: A Chinese Factuality Evaluation for Large Language ModelsabstractYancheng He, Shilong Li, Jiaheng Liu, Yingshui Tan, Weixun Wang, Hui Huang, Xingyuan Bu, Hangyu Guo, Chengwei Hu, Boren Zheng, Zhuoran Lin, Dekai Sun, Zhicheng Zheng, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Yancheng He, Yingshui Tan, Weixun Wang, Hui Huang 0021, Xingyuan Bu, Hangyu Guo, Chengwei Hu, Boren Zheng, Zhuoran Lin, Dekai Sun, Zhicheng Zheng, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng 0007 |
ACL (1) | 13 |
| 2025 | Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning?abstractYancheng He, Shilong Li, Jiaheng Liu, Weixun Wang, Xingyuan Bu, Ge Zhang, Z.y. Peng, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Zhicheng Zheng, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Yancheng He, Weixun Wang, Xingyuan Bu, Ge Zhang 0009, Z. Y. Peng, Zhaoxiang Zhang 0001, Zhicheng Zheng, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng 0007 |
ACL (1) | 9 |
| 2025 | VC4VG: Optimizing Video Captions for Text-to-Video GenerationabstractRecent advances in text-to-video (T2V) generation highlight the critical role of highquality video-text pairs in training models capable of producing coherent and instructionaligned videos.However, strategies for optimizing video captions specifically for T2V training remain underexplored.In this paper, we introduce VC4VG (Video Captioning for Video Generation), a comprehensive caption optimization framework tailored to the needs of T2V models.We begin by analyzing caption content from a T2V perspective, decomposing the essential elements required for video reconstruction into multiple dimensions, and proposing a principled caption design methodology.To support evaluation, we construct VC4VG-Bench, a new benchmark featuring fine-grained, multi-dimensional, and necessity-graded metrics aligned with T2Vspecific requirements.Extensive T2V finetuning experiments demonstrate a strong correlation between improved caption quality and video generation performance, validating the effectiveness of our approach.We release all benchmark tools and code 1 to support further research. Yang Du 0011, Zhuoran Lin, Kaiqiang Song, Zhicheng Zheng, Tiezheng Ge, Bo Zheng 0007, Qin Jin |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2024 | New Lower Bounds for Testing Monotonicity and Log Concavity of DistributionsabstractWe develop a new technique for proving distribution testing lower bounds for properties defined by inequalities on the individual bin probabilities (such as monotonicity and log-concavity). The basic idea is to find a base distribution $Q$ where these inequalities barely hold in many places. We then find two different ensembles of distributions that modify $Q$ in slightly different ways. We use a moment matching construction so that each ensemble has the same bin moments (in particular the expectation over the choice of distribution $p$ of $p_{i}^t$ is the same for the two ensembles for small integers $t$). We show that this makes it impossible to distinguish between the two ensembles with a small number of samples. On the other hand, we construct them so that one ensemble will tweak Q in such a way that it may violate the defining inequalities of the property in question in many places, while the second ensembles does not. Since any valid tester for this property must be able to reliably distinguish these ensembles, we obtain a lower bound of testing the property. Roughly speaking, if we can construct Q which nearly violates the defining inequalities in n places and if the desired error $\epilon$ is small enough relative to n, we hope to obtain a lower bound of roughly $\frac{n}{\epsilon^2}$ up to log factors. In particular, we obtain a lower bound of $\Omega( \min(n,(1/\epsilon)/ \log^3(1/\epsilon))\allowbreak / ( \epsilon^2 \log^7(1/\epsilon)))$ for monotonicity testing on $[n]$ and $\Omega(\log^{-7}(1/\epsilon) \epsilon^{-2} \min(n,\epsilon^{-1/2}\log^{-3/2}(1/\epsilon)))$ for log-concavity testing on $[n]$, the latter of which matches known upper bounds to within logarithmic factors. More generally, for monotonicity testing on $[n]^d$, we have the lower bound of $2^{-O(d)}d^{-d} \epsilon^{-2} \log^{-7}(1/\epsilon) \min(n,d \epsilon^{-1} \log^{-3}(1/\epsilon))^d$. Yuqian Cheng, Daniel M. Kane, Zhicheng Zheng |
COLT | 3 |
| 2024 | ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from VideosabstractWe introduce the Continuum Physical Dataset (ContPhy), a novel benchmark for assessing machine physical commonsense. ContPhy complements existing physical reasoning benchmarks by encompassing the inference of diverse physical properties, such as mass and density, across various scenarios and predicting corresponding dynamics. We evaluated a range of AI models and found that they still struggle to achieve satisfactory performance on ContPhy, which shows that current AI models still lack physical commonsense for the continuum, especially soft-bodies, and illustrates the value of the proposed dataset. We also introduce an oracle model (ContPRO) that marries the particle-based physical dynamic models with the recent large language models, which enjoy the advantages of both models, precise dynamic predictions, and interpretable reasoning. ContPhy aims to spur progress in perception and reasoning within diverse physical settings, narrowing the divide between human and machine intelligence in understanding the physical world. Zhicheng Zheng, Xin Yan 0008, Zhenfang Chen, Jingzhou Wang, Qin Zhi Eddie Lim, Josh Tenenbaum, Chuang Gan 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Optimizing Parameters of Self-Organizing Model for Swarm Robots via Evolutionary AlgorithmsabstractA swarm of robots is a typical self-organizing system. Parameters of self-organizing model can regulate the interaction among the individuals to achieve the desired collective motion. Thus, it makes sense to optimize the parameters for better performance in self-organization. The evolutionary algorithm (EA) is one promising heuristic optimization algorithm. However, quantitative evaluation of a self-organizing model is still an open scientific question. In this paper, we proposed three metrics for collective motion from the perspective of grouping, polarization and spatial distribution of group. Then, we designed the fitness function with the proposed metrics to bridge the gap between EA and parameter tuning of self-organizing model. In the experimental study, we optimized two kinds of self-organizing models using the differential evolution algorithm (DE) and validated the effectiveness in simulation. Moreover, we validated the optimized parameters on a swarm of physical robots. The experimental results show that the proposed metrics are effective to quantitatively evaluate the self-organizing model so that the DE performs well for the automatic parameter tuning of controlling swarm robots. Zhicheng Zheng, Xiaokang Lei, Xingguang Peng |
CEC | 1 |
| 2012 | Entity Disambiguation with FreebaseabstractEntity disambiguation with a knowledge base becomes increasingly popular in the NLP community. In this paper, we employ Freebase as the knowledge base, which contains significantly more entities than Wikipedia and others. While huge in size, Freebase lacks context for most entities, such as the descriptive text and hyperlinks in Wikipedia, which are useful for disambiguation. Instead, we leverage two features of Freebase, namely the naturally disambiguated mention phrases (aka aliases) and the rich taxonomy, to perform disambiguation in an iterative manner. Specifically, we explore both generative and discriminative models for each iteration. Experiments on 2, 430, 707 English sentences and 33, 743 Freebase entities show the effectiveness of the two features, where 90% accuracy can be reached without any labeled data. We also show that discriminative models with proposed split training strategy is robust against over fitting problem, and constantly outperforms the generative ones. Zhicheng Zheng, Xiance Si, Fangtao Li, Edward Y. Chang, Xiaoyan Zhu 0001 |
Web Intelligence | 1 |
| 2011 | K2Q: Generating Natural Language Questions from Keywords with User Refinements
Zhicheng Zheng, Xiance Si, Edward Y. Chang, Xiaoyan Zhu 0001 |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning to Link Entities with Knowledge Base
Zhicheng Zheng, Fangtao Li, Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu 0001 |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |