Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marian Stewart Bartlett

dblp:54/4284 · also Marni Stewart Bartlett · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
33ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 27 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 11 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 94% Image recognition and object detection · 3% Representation and self-supervised learning · 2%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Rendering · 60% Image and video processing · 40%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial expression analysis
facial expression recognition
0.362009
Toward Practical Smile Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Recognizing Facial Expression: Machine Learning and Application to Spontaneous Behavior · CVPR (2) 2005
Towards Social Robots: Automatic Evaluation of Human-robot Interaction by Face Detection and Expression Classification · NIPS 2003
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial expression analysis › facial expression recognition
dynamic facial expression recognition
0.212016
LOMo: Latent Ordinal Model for Facial Analysis in Videos · CVPR 2016
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial expression analysis › facial expression recognition
smile detection
0.112009
Toward Practical Smile Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial action unit recognition
0.112005
Recognizing Facial Expression: Machine Learning and Application to Spontaneous Behavior · CVPR (2) 2005
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection
0.012003
Towards Social Robots: Automatic Evaluation of Human-robot Interaction by Face Detection and Expression Classification · NIPS 2003
Human-robot interaction
social robot
0.012003
Towards Social Robots: Automatic Evaluation of Human-robot Interaction by Face Detection and Expression Classification · NIPS 2003
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial action recognition
0.021999
Classifying Facial Actions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1999
Classifying Facial Action · NIPS 1995
Rendering › image-based rendering
3d image warping
0.012002
A Prototype for Automatic Recognition of Spontaneous Facial Actions · NIPS 2002
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.012009
Toward Practical Smile Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2009
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial action unit analysis
facial action coding
0.011999
Image Representations for Facial Expression Coding · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.012005
Recognizing Facial Expression: Machine Learning and Application to Spontaneous Behavior · CVPR (2) 2005
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.011996
Viewpoint Invariant Face Recognition using Independent Component Analysis and Attractor Networks · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
pose-invariant face recognition
0.011996
Viewpoint Invariant Face Recognition using Independent Component Analysis and Attractor Networks · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial expression analysis
0.011999
Classifying Facial Actions · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis
0.011996
Viewpoint Invariant Face Recognition using Independent Component Analysis and Attractor Networks · NIPS 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple instance learning · 0.2latent SVM · 0.2hidden conditional random field · 0.2support vector machine · 0.1machine learning · 0.1image registration · 0.1feature representation · 0.1linear discriminant analysis · 0.1gabor filter · 0.1adaboost · 0.1face detection · 0.0expression classification · 0.0hidden markov model · 0.03d tracking and warping · 0.0image representations · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 LOMo: Latent Ordinal Model for Facial Analysis in Videos
abstract
We study the problem of facial analysis in videos. We propose a novel weakly supervised learning method that models the video event (expression, pain etc.) as a sequence of automatically mined, discriminative sub-events (e.g. onset and offset phase for smile, brow lower and cheek raise for pain). The proposed model is inspired by the recent works on Multiple Instance Learning and latent SVM/HCRF - it extends such frameworks to model the ordinal or temporal aspect in the videos, approximately. We obtain consistent improvements over relevant competitive baselines on four challenging and publicly available video based facial analysis datasets for prediction of expression, clinical pain and intent in dyadic conversations. In combination with complimentary features, we report state-of-the-art results on these datasets.
Karan Sikka, Gaurav Sharma 0004, Marian Stewart Bartlett
CVPR3
2016 Video-based facial expression recognition using learned spatiotemporal pyramid sparse coding features
Marian Stewart Bartlett
Neurocomputing2
2015 Joint Clustering and Classification for Multiple Instance Learning
Karan Sikka, Ritwik Giri, Marian Stewart Bartlett
BMVC3
2014 A discriminative parts based model approach for fiducial points free and shape constrained head pose normalisation in the wild
abstract
Continuous Confidence Map Based Normalisation: While continuous head pose normalisation is not the goal of this paper, we demonstrate as a proof of concept that it is possible to extend the current method for continuous head pose normalisation. For dealing with faces in videos [1], continuous head pose normalisation is required. [2] argue that the appearance of a part does not changes with a subtle pose change, therefore a detector for part i in pose angle p can be shared for the same part i for a pose angle p + δ. Further experiments in [2] showed that sharing based models and independent model have comparable performance. However, sharing based models are faster upto ten times as compared to the independent models [2]. The confidence maps based methods (CM-HPNPSand CM-HPNPI) can be extended from discrete to continuous by sharing part-specific regression models R, which are shared among neighboring pose angles.
Abhinav Dhall, Karan Sikka, Gwen Littlewort, Roland Göcke, Marian Stewart Bartlett
WACV5
2014 A discriminative parts based model approach for fiducial points free and shape constrained head pose normalisation in the wild
abstract
This paper proposes a method for parts-based view-invariant head pose normalisation, which works well even in difficult real-world conditions. Handling pose is a classical problem in facial analysis. Recently, parts-based models have shown promising performance for facial landmark points detection `in the wild'. Leveraging on the success of these models, the proposed data-driven regression framework computes a constrained normalised virtual frontal head pose. The response maps of a discriminatively trained part detector are used as texture information. These sparse texture maps are projected from non-frontal to frontal pose using block-wise structured regression. Finally, a facial kinematic shape constraint is achieved by applying a shape model. The advantages of the proposed approach are: a) no explicit dependence on the outputs of a facial parts detector and, thus, avoiding any error propagation owing to their failure; (b) the application of a shape prior on the reconstructed frontal maps provides an anatomically constrained facial shape; and c) modelling head pose as a mixture-of-parts model allows the framework to work without any prior pose information. Experiments are performed on the Multi-PIE and the `in the wild' SFEW databases. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Abhinav Dhall, Karan Sikka, Gwen Littlewort, Roland Göcke, Marian Stewart Bartlett
WACV5
2014 Classification and weakly supervised pain localization using multiple segment representation
Karan Sikka, Abhinav Dhall, Marian Stewart Bartlett
Image Vis. Comput.3
2013 Multiple kernel learning for emotion recognition in the wild
abstract
We propose a method to automatically detect emotions in unconstrained settings as part of the 2013 Emotion Recognition in the Wild Challenge [16], organized in conjunction with the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2013). Our method combines multiple visual descriptors with paralinguistic audio features for multimodal classification of video clips. Extracted features are combined using Multiple Kernel Learning and the clips are classified using an SVM into one of the seven emotion categories: Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Neutral, Sadness and Surprise. The proposed method achieves competitive results, with an accuracy gain of approximately 10% above the challenge baseline.
Karan Sikka, Karmen Dykstra, Suchitra Sathyanarayana, Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett
ICMI5
2012 Learning spatiotemporal features by using independent component analysis with application to facial expression recognition
Tingfan Wu, Javier R. Movellan, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen Littlewort
Neurocomputing4
2012 Best of Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition 2011
Rainer Stiefelhagen, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Kevin W. Bowyer
Image Vis. Comput.2
2012 Multilayer Architectures for Facial Action Unit Recognition
abstract
In expression recognition and many other computer vision applications, the recognition performance is greatly improved by adding a layer of nonlinear texture filters between the raw input pixels and the classifier. The function of this layer is typically known as feature extraction. Popular filter types for this layer are Gabor energy filters (GEFs) and local binary patterns (LBPs). Recent work [1] suggests that adding a second layer of nonlinear filters on top of the first layer may be beneficial. However, it is unclear what is the best architecture of layers and selection of filters. In this paper, we present a thorough empirical analysis of the performance of single-layer and dual-layer texture-based approaches for action unit recognition. For the single hidden layer case, GEFs perform consistently better than LBPs, which may be due to their robustness to jitter and illumination noise as well as to their ability to encode texture at multiple resolutions. For dual-layer case, we confirm that, while small, the benefit of adding this second layer is reliable and consistent across data sets. Interestingly for this second layer, LBPs appear to perform better than GEFs.
Tingfan Wu, Nicholas J. Butko, Paul Ruvolo, Jacob Whitehill, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B5
2011 Automated measurement of children's facial expressions during problem solving tasks
abstract
There has been growing recognition of the importance of adaptive tutoring systems that respond to the student's emotional and cognitive state. However little is known about children's facial expressions during a problem solving task. What are the actual signals of boredom, interest, or confusion in real, spontaneous behavior of students? The field also is in need of spontaneous datasets to drive automated recognition of these states. This project aims to collect, measure, and describe spontaneous facial expressions of children during problem solving. We apply the computer expression recognition toolbox (CERT) to videos of behavioral data from children between the ages of 3 and 9, particularly focusing on the spontaneous expressions of uncertainty. From the Facial Action outputs, we analyze changes in facial expression during problem solving, and differences in expression between correct and incorrect trials. Moreover, we demonstrate differences in expression dynamics between older and younger children during problem solving. Future work examines differences between facial action and other modalities such as voice pitch.
Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Linda P. Salamanca, Judy Reilly
FG2
2011 The motion in emotion - A CERT based approach to the FERA emotion challenge
abstract
This paper assesses the performance of measures of facial expression dynamics derived from the Computer Expression Recognition Toolbox (CERT) for classifying emotions in the Facial Expression Recognition and Analysis (FERA) Challenge. The CERT system automatically estimates facial action intensity and head position using learned appearance-based models on single frames of video. CERT outputs were used to derive a representation of the intensity and motion in each video, consisting of the extremes of displacement, velocity and acceleration. Using this representation, emotion detectors were trained on the FERA training examples. Experiments on the released portion of the FERA dataset are presented, as well as results on the blind test. No consideration of subject identity was taken into account in the blind test. The F1 scores were well above the baseline criterion for success.
Gwen Littlewort, Jacob Whitehill, Tingfan Wu, Nicholas J. Butko, Paul Ruvolo, Javier R. Movellan, Marian Stewart Bartlett
FG7
2011 The computer expression recognition toolbox (CERT)
abstract
We present the Computer Expression Recognition Toolbox (CERT), a software tool for fully automatic real-time facial expression recognition, and officially release it for free academic use. CERT can automatically code the intensity of 19 different facial actions from the Facial Action Unit Coding System (FACS) and 6 different prototypical facial expressions. It also estimates the locations of 10 facial features as well as the 3-D orientation (yaw, pitch, roll) of the head. On a database of posed facial expressions, Extended Cohn-Kanade (CK+[1]), CERT achieves an average recognition performance (probability of correctness on a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task between one positive and one negative example) of 90.1% when analyzing facial actions. On a spontaneous facial expression dataset, CERT achieves an accuracy of nearly 80%. In a standard dual core laptop, CERT can process 320 × 240 video images in real time at approximately 10 frames per second.
Gwen Littlewort, Jacob Whitehill, Tingfan Wu, Ian R. Fasel, Mark G. Frank, Javier R. Movellan, Marian Stewart Bartlett
FG7
2011 Action unit recognition transfer across datasets
abstract
We explore how CERT, a computer expression recognition toolbox trained on a large dataset of spontaneous facial expressions (FFD07), generalizes to a new, previously unseen dataset (FERA). The experiment was unique in that the authors had no access to the test labels, which were guarded as part of the FERA challenge. We show that without any training or special adaptation to the new database, CERT performs better than a baseline method trained exclusively on that database. Best results are achieved by retraining CERT with a combination of old and new data. We also found that the FERA dataset may be too small and idiosyncratic to generalize to other datasets. Training on FERA alone produced good results on FERA but very poor results on FFD07. We reflect on the importance of challenges like this for the future of the field, and discuss suggestions for standardization of future challenges.
Tingfan Wu, Nicholas J. Butko, Paul Ruvolo, Jacob Whitehill, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan
FG5
2010 Discrimination of Moderate and Acute Drowsiness Based on Spontaneous Facial Expressions
abstract
It is important for drowsiness detection systems to identify different levels of drowsiness and respond appropriately at each level. This study explores how to discriminate moderate from acute drowsiness by applying computer vision techniques to the human face. In our previous study, spontaneous facial expressions measured through computer vision techniques were used as an indicator to discriminate alert from acutely drowsy episodes. In this study we are exploring which facial muscle movements are predictive of moderate and acute drowsiness. The effect of temporal dynamics of action units on prediction performances is explored by capturing temporal dynamics using an over complete representation of temporal Gabor Filters. In the final system we perform feature selection to build a classifier that can discriminate moderate drowsy from acute drowsy episodes. The system achieves a classification rate of .96 A' in discriminating moderately drowsy versus acutely drowsy episodes. Moreover the study reveals new information in facial behavior occurring during different stages of drowsiness.
Esra Vural, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen Littlewort, Müjdat Çetin, Aytül Erçil, Javier R. Movellan
ICPR2
2009 Editorial
Mislav Grgic, Shiguang Shan, Rastislav Lukac, Harry Wechsler, Marian Stewart Bartlett
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.5
2009 Automatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain
Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Kang Lee
Image Vis. Comput.2
2009 Toward Practical Smile Detection
abstract
Machine learning approaches have produced some of the highest reported performances for facial expression recognition. However, to date, nearly all automatic facial expression recognition research has focused on optimizing performance on a few databases that were collected under controlled lighting conditions on a relatively small number of subjects. This paper explores whether current machine learning methods can be used to develop an expression recognition system that operates reliably in more realistic conditions. We explore the necessary characteristics of the training data set, image registration, feature representation, and machine learning algorithms. A new database, GENKI, is presented which contains pictures, photographed by the subjects themselves, from thousands of different people in many different real-world imaging conditions. Results suggest that human-level expression recognition accuracy in real-life illumination conditions is achievable with machine learning technology. However, the data sets currently used in the automatic expression recognition literature to evaluate progress may be overly constrained and could potentially lead research into locally optimal algorithmic solutions.
Jacob Whitehill, Gwen Littlewort, Ian R. Fasel, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
2008 Computer Expression Recognition Toolbox
abstract
We present a live demo of the Computer Expression Recognition Toolbox (CERT) developed at University of California, San Diego. CERT measures facial expressions in real-time, and codes them with respect to expressions of basic emotion, as well as over 20 facial actions from the Facial Action Coding System (Ekman & Friesen, 1978). Head pose (yaw, pitch, and roll) is also detected using an algorithm presented at this conference (Whitehill & Movellan, 2008). A sample output is shown in Figure 1.
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen Littlewort, Tingfan Wu, Javier R. Movellan
FG1
2008 Measuring the Perceived Difficulty of a Lecture Using Automatic Facial Expression Recognition
Jacob Whitehill, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2007 Faces of pain: automated measurement of spontaneousallfacial expressions of genuine and posed pain
abstract
We present initial results from the application of an automated facial expression recognition system to spontaneous facial expressions of pain. In this study, 26 participants were videotaped under three experimental conditions: baseline, posed pain, and real pain. In the real pain condition, subjects experienced cold pressor pain by submerging their arm in ice water. Our goal was to automatically determine which experimental condition was shown in a 60 second clip from a previously unseen subject. We chose a machine learning approach, previously used successfully to categorize basic emotional facial expressions in posed datasets as well as to detect individual facial actions of the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (Littlewort et al, 2006; Bartlett et al., 2006). For this study, we trained 20 Action Unit (AU) classifiers on over 5000 images selected from a combination of posed and spontaneous facial expressions. The output of the system was a real valued number indicating the distance to the separating hyperplane for each classifier. Applying this system to the pain video data produced a 20 channel output stream, consisting of one real value for each learned AU, for each frame of the video. This data was passed to a second layer of classifiers to predict the difference between baseline and pained faces, and the difference between expressions of real pain and fake pain. Naíve human subjects tested on the same videos were at chance for differentiating faked from real pain, obtaining only 52% accuracy. The automated system was successfully able to differentiate faked from real pain. In an analysis of 26 subjects, the system obtained 72% correct for subject independent discrimination of real versus fake pain on a 2-alternative forced choice. Moreover, the most discriminative facial action in the automated system output was AU 4 (brow lower), which all was consistent with findings using human expert FACS codes.
Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Kang Lee
ICMI2
2007 Information maximization in face processing
Marian Stewart Bartlett
Neurocomputing1
2007 New trends in Cognitive Science: Integrative approaches to learning and development
Gedeon O. Deák, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Tony Jebara
Neurocomputing2
2006 Dynamics of facial expression extracted automatically from video
Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Ian R. Fasel, Joshua M. Susskind, Javier R. Movellan
Image Vis. Comput.2
2005 Recognizing Facial Expression: Machine Learning and Application to Spontaneous Behavior
abstract
We present a systematic comparison of machine learning methods applied to the problem of fully automatic recognition of facial expressions. We report results on a series of experiments comparing recognition engines, including AdaBoost, support vector machines, linear discriminant analysis. We also explored feature selection techniques, including the use of AdaBoost for feature selection prior to classification by SVM or LDA. Best results were obtained by selecting a subset of Gabor filters using AdaBoost followed by classification with support vector machines. The system operates in real-time, and obtained 93% correct generalization to novel subjects for a 7-way forced choice on the Cohn-Kanade expression dataset. The outputs of the classifiers change smoothly as a function of time and thus can be used to measure facial expression dynamics. We applied the system to to fully automated recognition of facial actions (FACS). The present system classifies 17 action units, whether they occur singly or in combination with other actions, with a mean accuracy of 94.8%. We present preliminary results for applying this system to spontaneous facial expressions.
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen Littlewort, Mark G. Frank, Claudia Lainscsek, Ian R. Fasel, Javier R. Movellan
CVPR (2)1
2003 Towards Social Robots: Automatic Evaluation of Human-robot Interaction by Face Detection and Expression Classification
Gwen Littlewort, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Ian R. Fasel, Joel Chenu, Takayuki Kanda 0001, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Javier R. Movellan
NIPS2
2003 Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA
Bruce A. Draper, Kyungim Baek, Marian Stewart Bartlett, J. Ross Beveridge
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.3
2002 A Prototype for Automatic Recognition of Spontaneous Facial Actions
abstract
We present ongoing work on a project for automatic recognition of spon- taneous facial actions. Spontaneous facial expressions differ substan- tially from posed expressions, similar to how continuous, spontaneous speech differs from isolated words produced on command. Previous methods for automatic facial expression recognition assumed images were collected in controlled environments in which the subjects delib- erately faced the camera. Since people often nod or turn their heads, automatic recognition of spontaneous facial behavior requires methods for handling out-of-image-plane head rotations. Here we explore an ap- proach based on 3-D warping of images into canonical views. We eval- uated the performance of the approach as a front-end for a spontaneous expression recognition system using support vector machines and hidden Markov models. This system employed general purpose learning mech- anisms that can be applied to recognition of any facial movement. The system was tested for recognition of a set of facial actions defined by the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). We showed that 3D tracking and warping followed by machine learning techniques directly applied to the warped images, is a viable and promising technology for automatic facial expression recognition. One exciting aspect of the approach pre- sented here is that information about movement dynamics emerged out of filters which were derived from the statistics of images.
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gwen Littlewort, Bjorn Braathen, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Javier R. Movellan
NIPS1
2002 Face recognition by independent component analysis
abstract
A number of current face recognition algorithms use face representations found by unsupervised statistical methods. Typically these methods find a set of basis images and represent faces as a linear combination of those images. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a popular example of such methods. The basis images found by PCA depend only on pairwise relationships between pixels in the image database. In a task such as face recognition, in which important information may be contained in the high-order relationships among pixels, it seems reasonable to expect that better basis images may be found by methods sensitive to these high-order statistics. Independent component analysis (ICA), a generalization of PCA, is one such method. We used a version of ICA derived from the principle of optimal information transfer through sigmoidal neurons. ICA was performed on face images in the FERET database under two different architectures, one which treated the images as random variables and the pixels as outcomes, and a second which treated the pixels as random variables and the images as outcomes. The first architecture found spatially local basis images for the faces. The second architecture produced a factorial face code. Both ICA representations were superior to representations based on PCA for recognizing faces across days and changes in expression. A classifier that combined the two ICA representations gave the best performance.
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan, Terrence J. Sejnowski
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks1
1999 Image Representations for Facial Expression Coding
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Gianluca Donato, Javier R. Movellan, Joseph C. Hager, Paul Ekman, Terrence J. Sejnowski
NIPS1
1999 Classifying Facial Actions
abstract
The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) [23] is an objective method for quantifying facial movement in terms of component actions. This system is widely used in behavioral investigations of emotion, cognitive processes, and social interaction. The coding is presently performed by highly trained human experts. This paper explores and compares techniques for automatically recognizing facial actions in sequences of images. These techniques include analysis of facial motion through estimation of optical flow; holistic spatial analysis, such as principal component analysis, independent component analysis, local feature analysis, and linear discriminant analysis; and methods based on the outputs of local filters, such as Gabor wavelet representations and local principal components. Performance of these systems is compared to naive and expert human subjects. Best performances were obtained using the Gabor wavelet representation and the independent component representation, both of which achieved 96 percent accuracy for classifying 12 facial actions of the upper and lower face. The results provide converging evidence for the importance of using local filters, high spatial frequencies, and statistical independence for classifying facial actions.
Gianluca Donato, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Joseph C. Hager, Paul Ekman, Terrence J. Sejnowski
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1996 Viewpoint Invariant Face Recognition using Independent Component Analysis and Attractor Networks
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Terrence J. Sejnowski
NIPS1
1995 Classifying Facial Action
Marian Stewart Bartlett, Paul A. Viola, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Beatrice A. Golomb, Jan Larsen, Joseph C. Hager, Paul Ekman
NIPS1