Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gary Dickson

dblp:55/3498 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
user-centered design
0.212016
Why Design Method Development is Not Always Carried Out as User-Centered Design · CHI 2016
Empirical software engineering › software engineering practice
design practice
0.112016
Why Design Method Development is Not Always Carried Out as User-Centered Design · CHI 2016
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.112016
Why Design Method Development is Not Always Carried Out as User-Centered Design · CHI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observation · 0.5interviews · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Why Design Method Development is Not Always Carried Out as User-Centered Design
abstract
In a series of interviews and observations conducted over the past two years, we examined how designers have created, adopted, and evolved design methods into practice. These studies have led us to question the processes used and assumptions held by those who have been involved in developing new design methods. Our studies have shown that even though user-centered design is advocated by most researchers and practitioners, when it comes to their own way of developing design methods for others, it is not done using a user-centered approach. However, we found interesting differences among the three categories of interviewees; practitioners, researchers and practitioner/researchers.
Gary Dickson, Erik Stolterman
CHI1