Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Josh Abramson

dblp:56/9999 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 19% Vision and language · 19%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task transfer
0.612022
A data-driven approach for learning to control computers · ICML 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.612022
Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
predictive representation learning
0.412020
Probing Emergent Semantics in Predictive Agents via Question Answering · ICML 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › autonomous agents
embodied agent
0.212022
Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.1imitation learning · 1.1semi-supervised learning · 0.6intra-agent speech · 0.6behavioral priors · 0.6behavioral prior · 0.6simcore · 0.4question answering decoder · 0.4action-conditional CPC · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A data-driven approach for learning to control computers
abstract
It would be useful for machines to use computers as humans do so that they can aid us in everyday tasks. This is a setting in which there is also the potential to leverage large-scale expert demonstrations and human judgements of interactive behaviour, which are two ingredients that have driven much recent success in AI. Here we investigate the setting of computer control using keyboard and mouse, with goals specified via natural language. Instead of focusing on hand-designed curricula and specialized action spaces, we focus on developing a scalable method centered on reinforcement learning combined with behavioural priors informed by actual human-computer interactions. We achieve state-of-the-art and human-level mean performance across all tasks within the MiniWob++ benchmark, a challenging suite of computer control problems, and find strong evidence of cross-task transfer. These results demonstrate the usefulness of a unified human-agent interface when training machines to use computers. Altogether our results suggest a formula for achieving competency beyond MiniWob++ and towards controlling computers, in general, as a human would.
Peter Conway Humphreys, David Raposo, Tobias Pohlen, Gregory Thornton, Rachita Chhaparia, Alistair Muldal, Josh Abramson, Petko Georgiev, Adam Santoro, Timothy P. Lillicrap
ICML7
2022 Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition
abstract
Human language learners are exposed to a trickle of informative, context-sensitive language, but a flood of raw sensory data. Through both social language use and internal processes of rehearsal and practice, language learners are able to build high-level, semantic representations that explain their perceptions. Here, we take inspiration from such processes of "inner speech" in humans (Vygotsky, 1934) to better understand the role of intra-agent speech in embodied behavior. First, we formally pose intra-agent speech as a semi-supervised problem and develop two algorithms that enable visually grounded captioning with little labeled language data. We then experimentally compute scaling curves over different amounts of labeled data and compare the data efficiency against a supervised learning baseline. Finally, we incorporate intra-agent speech into an embodied, mobile manipulator agent operating in a 3D virtual world, and show that with as few as 150 additional image captions, intra-agent speech endows the agent with the ability to manipulate and answer questions about a new object without any related task-directed experience (zero-shot). Taken together, our experiments suggest that modelling intra-agent speech is effective in enabling embodied agents to learn new tasks efficiently and without direct interaction experience.
Federico Carnevale, Petko Georgiev, Adam Santoro, Aurelia Guy, Alistair Muldal, Chia-Chun Hung, Josh Abramson, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Greg Wayne
NeurIPS8
2020 Probing Emergent Semantics in Predictive Agents via Question Answering
abstract
Recent work has shown how predictive modeling can endow agents with rich knowledge of their surroundings, improving their ability to act in complex environments. We propose question-answering as a general paradigm to decode and understand the representations that such agents develop, applying our method to two recent approaches to predictive modelling - action-conditional CPC (Guo et al., 2018) and SimCore (Gregor et al., 2019). After training agents with these predictive objectives in a visually-rich, 3D environment with an assortment of objects, colors, shapes, and spatial configurations, we probe their internal state representations with a host of synthetic (English) questions, without backpropagating gradients from the question-answering decoder into the agent. The performance of different agents when probed in this way reveals that they learn to encode factual, and seemingly compositional, information about objects, properties and spatial relations from their physical environment. Our approach is intuitive, i.e. humans can easily interpret the responses of the model as opposed to inspecting continuous vectors, and model-agnostic, i.e. applicable to any modeling approach. By revealing the implicit knowledge of objects, quantities, properties and relations acquired by agents as they learn, question-conditional agent probing can stimulate the design and development of stronger predictive learning objectives.
Federico Carnevale, Hamza Merzic, Laura Rimell, Rosália G. Schneider, Josh Abramson, Alden Hung, Arun Ahuja, Stephen Clark, Greg Wayne, Felix Hill
ICML6