Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex Kass

dblp:57/3538 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 81% Human-AI interaction · 19%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
design practice
0.612022
How Experienced Designers of Enterprise Applications Engage AI as a Design Material · CHI 2022
Design research and methods
design workshops
0.212022
How Experienced Designers of Enterprise Applications Engage AI as a Design Material · CHI 2022
Computing education › AI education
machine learning education
0.011994
Tailoring Retrieval to Support Case-Based Teaching · AAAI 1994
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
example-based explanation
0.011989
Adaptation-Based Explanation: Explanations as Cases · ML 1989
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.011989
Adaptation-Based Explanation: Explanations as Cases · ML 1989
Information retrieval
case-based retrieval
0.011994
Tailoring Retrieval to Support Case-Based Teaching · AAAI 1994
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.011994
Tailoring Retrieval to Support Case-Based Teaching · AAAI 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 0.6design workshop · 0.6retrieval · 0.0adaptation-based explanation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 How Experienced Designers of Enterprise Applications Engage AI as a Design Material
abstract
HCI research has explored AI as a design material, suggesting that designers can envision AI’s design opportunities to improve UX. Recent research claimed that enterprise applications offer an opportunity for AI innovation at the user experience level. We conducted design workshops to explore the practices of experienced designers who work on cross-functional AI teams in the enterprise. We discussed how designers successfully work with and struggle with AI. Our findings revealed that designers can innovate at the system and service levels. We also discovered that making a case for an AI feature’s return on investment is a barrier for designers when they propose AI concepts and ideas. Our discussions produced novel insights on designers’ role on AI teams, and the boundary objects they used for collaborating with data scientists. We discuss the implications of these findings as opportunities for future research aiming to empower designers in working with data and AI.
Nur Yildirim, Alex Kass, Teresa Tung, Connor Upton, Donnacha Costello, Robert Giusti, Sinem Lacin, Sara Lovic, James M. O'Neill, Rudi O'Reilly Meehan, Eoin Ó Loideáin, Azzurra Pini, Medb Corcoran, Jer Hayes, Diarmuid Cahalane, Gaurav Shivhare, Luigi Castoro, Giovanni Caruso, Changhoon Oh, James McCann, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman
CHI2
2016 Dynamics of Software Development Crowdsourcing
abstract
The emergence of online labor markets has concentrated a lot of attention on the prospect of using crowdsourcing for software development, with a potential to reduce costs, improve time-to-market, and access high-quality skills on demand. However, crowdsourcing of software development is still not widely adopted. A key barrier to adoption is a lack of confidence that a task will be completed on time with the required quality standards. While good managers can develop good, intuitive estimates of task completion when assigning work to their team members, they might lack similar intuition for individuals drawn from an online crowd. The phrase, "Post and Hope" is thus sometimes used when talking about the crowdsourcing of software-development tasks. The objective of this paper is to show the value of replacing the traditional, intuitive assessment of a team's capability with a quantitative assessment of the crowd, derived through analysis of historical performance on similar tasks. This analysis will serve to transform "Post and Hope" to "Post and Expect." We demonstrate this by analyzing data about tasks performed on two popular crowdsourcing platforms: Topcoder and Upwork. Analysis of historical data from these platforms indicates that the platforms indeed demonstrate some level of predictability in task completion. We have identified certain factors that consistently contribute to task completion on both the platforms. Our findings suggest that a data-driven decision processes can play an important role in successful adoption of crowdsourcing practice for software development.
Alpana Dubey, Kumar Abhinav, Sakshi Taneja, Gurdeep Virdi, Anurag Dwarakanath, Alex Kass, Mani Suma Kuriakose
ICGSE6
2011 Automatically Mapping Natural Language Requirements to Domain-Specific Process Models
abstract
For large scale enterprise implementations, a key problem, that has not been tackled much, is the ability to automatically map users’ requirements to reference process models. We present a tool called Process Model Requirements Gap Analyzer (ProcGap), which uses a combination of natural language processing, information retrieval and semantic reasoning to automatically match and map textual requirements to industry-specific process models. We present the results of mapping requirements from an industry project to an existing process model. We compare our approach to two previously implemented approaches and show that our approach outperforms them. In a case study, we also found that a user group with ProcGap had better performance than a user group that performed the same task manually.
Uthayasanker Thayasivam, Kunal Verma, Alex Kass, Reymonrod G. Vasquez
IAAI3
2009 Extracting High-Level Functional Design from Software Requirements
abstract
Practitioners spend significant amounts of time creating high-level design from requirements. Though there exist methodologies to describe and manage requirements and design artifacts, there is not yet an automated way to faithfully translate a requirement into a high-level design. While it is extremely difficult to generate design elements from free-form natural language due to its inherent ambiguity, it is possible to significantly improve the accuracy of the design from relatively structured and constrained natural language. In this paper we propose a technique to generate high-level class diagrams from a set of requirements, using a set of requirement-specific heuristics. In this approach, we leverage work we had previously done to first process a requirement statement to classify it into a requirement type, and then break it into various constituents. Depending on the requirement type and its constituents, our heuristics then discover a functional design comprising of coarse-grained modules, their relationships and responsibilities. We express the design as a UML class diagram in IBM rational software architect (RSA) format. Our preliminary investigation shows that the resulting class diagram is rich, and can be used by practitioners as a basis for further design.
Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Santonu Sarkar, Kunal Verma, Arun Panayappan, Alex Kass
APSEC5
2009 Towards a Technology Platform for Building Corporate Radar Applications that Mine the Web for Business Insight
abstract
In this paper, we give a progress report on an ongoing effort at Accenture to develop a technology platform for building a wide range of corporate radar applications,which can turn the Web into a systematic source of business insight. Our goal is to share the platform we have developed and the lessons we have learned, so others can leverage this knowledge when building similar applications. We give an overview of this platform, which integrates a combination of established AI technologies - i.e. semantic models, natural language processing, and inference engines - in a novel way. We then illustrate the kinds of corporate radars that can be built with our platform through two applications we developed at Accenture: the technology lifecycle tracker, which assesses the maturity of technologies from the wireless industry, and the technology trend tracker, which measures hype versus reality for emerging technology trends such as cloud computing, software-as-a-service, and more. Finally, we discuss our experiences in using this platform to build these applications and the lessons learned.
Peter Z. Yeh, Colin A. Puri, Alex Kass
ICTAI3
2008 Capturing the Semantics of Online News Sources for Business Intelligence Applications
abstract
In this paper, we present a knowledge based approach to capture rich semantic representations from online news sources for business intelligence (BI) applications that know the representations of interest in advance. Our approach performs this task by generating phrases from these representations and matching these phrases against the news using a set of syntactic and semantic transformations. The representation that best matches a piece of news is selected as its meaning. We present two evaluations showing how our approach performs well on capturing the semantics of online new sources for BI applications.
Peter Z. Yeh, Alex Kass
ICTAI (1)2
2008 A Knowledge Based Approach for Capturing Rich Semantic Representations from Text
Peter Z. Yeh, Daniel R. Farina, Alex Kass
KES (1)3
2008 Requirements Analysis Tool: A Tool for Automatically Analyzing Software Requirements Documents
Kunal Verma, Alex Kass
ISWC2
1998 The Use of 'War Stories' in Intelligent Learning Environments
Benjamin Bell, Jan Hawkins, R. Bowen Loftin, Tom T. Carey, Alex Kass
Intelligent Tutoring Systems5
1998 Semantics and Pedagogy in Authoring Educational Technology: Confronting the Mismatch Bewtween Researchers' Expectations and Users'
Benjamin Bell, Alex Kass, M. David Merrill, Tom Murray 0001, Brenda M. Wenzel
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
1994 Tailoring Retrieval to Support Case-Based Teaching
Robin D. Burke, Alex Kass
AAAI2
1989 Adaptation-Based Explanation: Explanations as Cases
Alex Kass
ML1
1989 Adaptation-Based Explanation: Extending Script/Frame Theory to Handle Novel Input
Alex Kass
IJCAI1