Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mari Tyllinen
dblp:58/7179
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-1531-2624ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 91% Health and well-being technologies · 9% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › usability inspection
heuristic evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | We Need Numbers!: Heuristic Evaluation during Demonstrations (HED) for Measuring Usability in IT System Procurement · CHI 2016 |
Usability and user experience research
usability evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | We Need Numbers!: Heuristic Evaluation during Demonstrations (HED) for Measuring Usability in IT System Procurement · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user scenarios · 0.2heuristic evaluation during demonstrations · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | We Need Numbers!: Heuristic Evaluation during Demonstrations (HED) for Measuring Usability in IT System ProcurementabstractWe introduce a new usability inspection method called HED (heuristic evaluation during demonstrations) for measuring and comparing usability of competing complex IT systems in public procurement. The method presented enhances traditional heuristic evaluation to include the use context, comprehensive view of the system, and reveals missing functionality by using user scenarios and demonstrations. HED also quantifies the results in a comparable way. We present findings from a real-life validation of the method in a large-scale procurement project of a healthcare and social welfare information system. We analyze and compare the performance of HED to other usability evaluation methods used in procurement. Based on the analysis HED can be used to evaluate the level of usability of an IT system during procurement correctly, comprehensively and efficiently. Mari Tyllinen, Johanna Viitanen, Tinja Lääveri, Marko Nieminen |
CHI | 1 |