Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guohong Liu 0002

dblp:59/10173-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5959-8604ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-AI interaction · 73% User interface design and tools · 27%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 82% Program analysis · 18%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
GUI agent
1.012026
AgentProg: Empowering Long-Horizon GUI Agents with Program-guided Context Management · MobiSys 2026
Human-AI interaction › automation
mobile task automation
0.812024
AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Android · MobiCom 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
belief state
0.312026
AgentProg: Empowering Long-Horizon GUI Agents with Program-guided Context Management · MobiSys 2026
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.212024
AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Android · MobiCom 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program-guided context management · 3.0belief MDP · 3.0benchmark construction · 2.0app content instrumentation · 2.0multi-granularity query optimization · 1.5memory injection · 1.5large language model · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?
abstract
Recent years have witnessed a rapid development of mobile GUI agents powered by large language models (LLMs), which can autonomously execute diverse device-control tasks based on natural language instructions. The increasing accuracy of these agents on standard benchmarks has raised expectations for large-scale real-world deployment, and there are already several commercial agents released and used by early adopters. However, are we really ready for GUI agents integrated into our daily devices as system building blocks? We argue that an important pre-deployment validation is missing to examine whether the agents can maintain their performance under real-world threats. Specifically, unlike existing common benchmarks that are based on simple static app contents (they have to do so to ensure environment consistency between different tests), real-world apps are filled with contents from untrustworthy third parties, such as advertisement emails, user-generated posts and medias, etc. These contents may inevitably appear in the agents' observation space and influence the task execution process. Systematic investigation of this problem is challenging since the real-world app contents are significantly skewed—testing on normal real-world apps usually cannot uncover any potential risk since most app contents are benign. To this end, we introduce a scalable app content instrumentation framework to enable flexible and targeted content modifications within existing applications. Leveraging this framework, we create a test suite comprising both a dynamic task execution environment and a static dataset of challenging GUI states. The dynamic environment encompasses 122 reproducible tasks, and the static dataset consists of over 3,000 scenarios constructed from commercial apps. We perform experiments on both open-source and commercial GUI agents. Our findings reveal that all examined agents can be significantly degraded due to third-party contents, with an average misleading rate of 42.0% and 36.1% in dynamic and static environments respectively. The framework and benchmark has been released at https://agenthazard.github.io.
Guohong Liu 0002, Jialei Ye, Wei Liu 0302, Pengzhi Gao, Jian Luan 0001, Yuanchun Li 0003, Yunxin Liu 0001
MobiSys1
2026 AgentProg: Empowering Long-Horizon GUI Agents with Program-guided Context Management
abstract
The rapid development of mobile GUI agents has stimulated growing research interest in long-horizon task automation. However, building agents for these tasks faces a critical bottleneck: the reliance on ever-expanding interaction history incurs substantial context overhead. Existing context management and compression techniques often fail to preserve vital semantic information, leading to degraded task performance. We propose AgentProg, a program-guided approach for agent context management that reframes the interaction history as a program with variables and control flow. By organizing information according to the structure of program, this structure provides a principled mechanism to determine which information should be retained and which can be discarded. We further integrate a global belief state mechanism inspired by Belief MDP framework to handle partial observability and adapt to unexpected environmental changes. Experiments on AndroidWorld and our extended long-horizon task suite demonstrate that AgentProg has achieved state-of-the-art success rates on these benchmarks. More importantly, it maintains robust performance on long-horizon tasks while baseline methods experience catastrophic degradation. Our system is open-sourced at https://github.com/MobileLLM/AgentProg.
Shizuo Tian, Hao Wen 0004, Shanhui Zhao, Guohong Liu 0002, Ju Ren 0001, Yunxin Liu 0001, Yuanchun Li 0003
MobiSys6
2024 AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Android
abstract
Mobile task automation is an attractive technique that aims to enable voice-based hands-free user interaction with smartphones. However, existing approaches suffer from poor scalability due to the limited language understanding ability and the non-trivial manual efforts required from developers or endusers. The recent advance of large language models (LLMs) in language understanding and reasoning inspires us to rethink the problem from a model-centric perspective, where task preparation, comprehension, and execution are handled by a unified language model. In this work, we introduce AutoDroid, a mobile task automation system capable of handling arbitrary tasks on any Android application without manual efforts. The key insight is to combine the commonsense knowledge of LLMs and domain-specific knowledge of apps through automated dynamic analysis. The main components include a functionality-aware UI representation method that bridges the UI with the LLM, exploration-based memory injection techniques that augment the app-specific domain knowledge of LLM, and a multi-granularity query optimization module that reduces the cost of model inference. We integrate AutoDroid with off-the-shelf LLMs including online GPT-4/GPT-3.5 and on-device Vicuna, and evaluate its performance on a new benchmark for memory-augmented Android task automation with 158 common tasks. The results demonstrated that AutoDroid is able to precisely generate actions with an accuracy of 90.9%, and complete tasks with a success rate of 71.3%, outperforming the GPT-4-powered baselines by 36.4% and 39.7%.
Hao Wen 0004, Yuanchun Li 0003, Guohong Liu 0002, Shanhui Zhao, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Shiqi Jiang 0002, Yunhao Liu 0001, Yunxin Liu 0001
MobiCom3