Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

F. Bouchard

dblp:59/5206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Health and well-being technologies · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics › medical robot control
surgical robot control
0.012002
A Compact, Compliant Laparoscopic Endoscope Manipulator · ICRA 2002
Human-robot interaction › healthcare robotics
medical robotics
0.012002
A Compact, Compliant Laparoscopic Endoscope Manipulator · ICRA 2002
Health and well-being technologies › medical technology
surgical assistance
0.012002
A Compact, Compliant Laparoscopic Endoscope Manipulator · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

open-loop control · 0.1feedback control · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 A Compact, Compliant Laparoscopic Endoscope Manipulator
abstract
We have developed a cable-driven manipulator using pneumatic artificial muscle actuators to control the orientation and insertion depth of an endoscope during abdominal surgery. This manipulator enables a single surgeon to manipulate surgical instruments with both hands while the endoscope position is controlled to view an area of interest inside the abdomen. The surgeon may then control the endoscope by alternate methods such as voice commands, pedals, a joystick, or head movements. The advantages of our newly developed endoscope manipulator over those of commercially available robotic laparoscopic surgical systems are its low cost, simplicity, ease of setup and use, compliance, nonintrusiveness, and very small size and light weight, with the disadvantage of somewhat reduced absolute positioning accuracy. Multiple instruments may be manipulated simultaneously by the manipulators set close together. Experimental performance results of open-loop and feedback control methods are presented.
Peter J. Berkelman, Philippe Cinquin, Jocelyne Troccaz, Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Christian Létoublon, F. Bouchard
ICRA6