Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard A. Lewallen

dblp:65/2835 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › user interface programming
interactive graphics programming
0.011974
Reducing graphics programming effort through structured support · SIGGRAPH 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transition tables · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1975 Reducing graphics programming effort through structured support
Richard A. Lewallen
Comput. Graph.1
1974 Reducing graphics programming effort through structured support
abstract
This paper describes a method for structuring graphics support which simplifies the programming of interactive applications, while improving their portability by providing a device-independent interface. The primary objective is to ease the task of the application programmer in developing applications which use interaction and graphics. Common graphics functions which are used by several applications are generalized and defined in terms of transition tables. User actions become inputs, system wait points become states, and system responses are pointed to by table outputs. A suitable modification is applied to each of the generalized graphics functions to tailor it to be used by a particular application.
Richard A. Lewallen
SIGGRAPH1