Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert O. Ambrose

dblp:67/2925 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 14 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
14 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 30% Robot manipulation · 17%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers
Human-robot interaction · 80% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 20%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.962024
RoboBall: An All-Terrain Spherical Robot with a Pressurized Shell · ICRA 2024
Mobile Manipulation using NASA's Robonaut · ICRA 2004
The Minimum Form of Strength in Serial, Parallel and Bifurcated Manipulators · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.812024
RoboBall: An All-Terrain Spherical Robot with a Pressurized Shell · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
spherical robot
0.812024
RoboBall: An All-Terrain Spherical Robot with a Pressurized Shell · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation
0.232011
Robonaut 2 - The first humanoid robot in space · ICRA 2011
Mobile Manipulation using NASA's Robonaut · ICRA 2004
The Challenges of Extra-vehicular Robotic Locomotion aboard Orbiting Spacecraft · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
0.222011
Robonaut 2 - The first humanoid robot in space · ICRA 2011
Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.242006
Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments · ICRA 2005
Tactile Gloves for Autonomous Grasping with the NASA/DARPA Robonaut · ICRA 2004
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot
0.112011
Robonaut 2 - The first humanoid robot in space · ICRA 2011
Haptics and multimodal interaction
tactile sensing
0.122004
Tactile Gloves for Autonomous Grasping with the NASA/DARPA Robonaut · ICRA 2004
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.122004
Mobile Manipulation using NASA's Robonaut · ICRA 2004
Automation of bioregenerative habitats for space environments · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.112006
Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
space robotics
0.122004
The Challenges of Extra-vehicular Robotic Locomotion aboard Orbiting Spacecraft · ICRA 2004
An Automated Tether Management System for Microgravity Extravehicular Activities · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation
0.112005
Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance
0.112005
Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments · ICRA 2005
Human-robot interaction › robot navigation
person following
0.112005
Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
autonomous grasping
0.012004
Tactile Gloves for Autonomous Grasping with the NASA/DARPA Robonaut · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.012004
Telepresence control of the NASA/DARPA robonaut on a mobility platform · CHI 2004
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
telepresence control
0.012004
Telepresence control of the NASA/DARPA robonaut on a mobility platform · CHI 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
shared control
0.012003
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
teleoperation
0.012003
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
robotic gripper
0.012002
An Automated Tether Management System for Microgravity Extravehicular Activities · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
kinematic design
0.011998
The Minimum Form of Strength in Serial, Parallel and Bifurcated Manipulators · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
reach-to-grasp
0.012006
Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
virtual reality teleoperation
0.012004
Telepresence control of the NASA/DARPA robonaut on a mobility platform · CHI 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
robot joint design
0.011995
Interactive Robot Joint Design, Analysis and Prototyping · ICRA 1995
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
finite difference methods
0.011995
Robots Models for Space Enviroments · ICRA 1995
Computational fabrication
additive manufacturing
0.011995
Interactive Robot Joint Design, Analysis and Prototyping · ICRA 1995
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time control
0.011995
An Experimental Investigation of Actuators for Space Robots · ICRA 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pneumatic shell design · 0.8pendulum dynamics modeling · 0.8force sensing · 0.3distributed control · 0.2tactile sensing · 0.1stereo vision · 0.1laser range finding · 0.1verbs and adverbs algorithm · 0.1virtual reality · 0.0teleoperation · 0.0coordinated control · 0.0computer analysis · 0.0visual object tracking · 0.0compliance control · 0.0variational geometry · 0.0thermal vacuum testing · 0.0thermal simulation · 0.0gain scheduling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 RoboBall: An All-Terrain Spherical Robot with a Pressurized Shell
abstract
Spherical robots are a different type of mobility platform. A spherical robot is self-contained within its shell rather than relying on a chassis with wheels to navigate. In this shell, it is completely shielded from dust and the environment. This benefit of geometric simplicity has led to the spherical robot becoming an advantageous option for all-terrain exploration and surveying. This paper focuses on a novel iteration of such a robot with a pressurized pneumatic shell design. A soft robot of this type brings benefits of a passive, compliant contact surface that can affect its performance. However, the added softness of its shell adds new unmodeled dynamics into the system that impair commonly used control schemes. This paper outlines the design and manufacture of a soft, inflatable, spherical shell designed for a robot driven by an internal 2-DOF pendulum. In addition, it presents models for controlling the pendulum and understanding the shell dynamics. The paper concludes with experimental validations of these models and field tests of the system on slopes, gravel, rough grass, and on water.
Micah Oevermann, Derek Pravecek, Garrett Jibrail, Rishi Jangale, Robert O. Ambrose
ICRA5
2024 Design of a Soft Shell for a Spherical Exploration Robot Traversing Varying Terrain
abstract
Exploration robots are typically equipped with either wheels or legs for mobility. However, these conventional designs inherently possess certain limitations, such as restricted ability to navigate through steep slopes, soft soil or muddy watery terrain. Despite the advancements in robotics technoloy, these challenges persist in both terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. To overcome these obstacles, we have proposed a novel solution in the form of a spherical robot with a soft shell. This paper provides an overview of the construction of this spherical robot and the design of its soft shell for adapting to varying terrain. Furthermore, we analyze and characterize its performance across various terrain types as the shell pressure is changed. By employing this approach, the paper establishes the suitability and efficiency of the spherical robot in traversing different terrain by adapting the shell pressure.
Meghali Prashant Dravid, Micah Oevermann, David McDougall, David Dugas, Robert O. Ambrose
IROS5
2011 Robonaut 2 - The first humanoid robot in space
abstract
NASA and General Motors have developed the second generation Robonaut, Robonaut 2 or R2, and it is scheduled to arrive on the International Space Station in early 2011 and undergo initial testing by mid-year. This state of the art, dexterous, anthropomorphic robotic torso has significant technical improvements over its predecessor making it a far more valuable tool for astronauts. Upgrades include: increased force sensing, greater range of motion, higher bandwidth, and improved dexterity. R2's integrated mechatronic design results in a more compact and robust distributed control system with a fraction of the wiring of the original Robonaut. Modularity is prevalent throughout the hardware and software along with innovative and layered approaches for sensing and control. The most important aspects of the Robonaut philosophy are clearly present in this latest model's ability to allow comfortable human interaction and in its design to perform significant work using the same hardware and interfaces used by people. The following describes the mechanisms, integrated electronics, control strategies, and user interface that make R2 a promising addition to the Space Station and other environments where humanoid robots can assist people.
Myron A. Diftler, Joshua Mehling, Muhammad E. Abdallah, Nicolaus A. Radford, Lyndon Bridgwater, Adam M. Sanders, R. Scott Askew, D. Marty Linn, John D. Yamokoski, Frank Permenter, Brian K. Hargrave, Robert Platt 0001, Robert T. Savely, Robert O. Ambrose
ICRA14
2006 A Preliminary Study of Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction
abstract
The Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Interaction (P2P-HRI) project is developing techniques to improve task coordination and collaboration between human and robot partners. Our work is motivated by the need to develop effective human-robot teams for space mission operations. A central element of our approach is creating dialogue and interaction tools that enable humans and robots to flexibly support one another. In order to understand how this approach can influence task performance, we recently conducted a series of tests simulating a lunar construction task with a human-robot team. In this paper, we describe the tests performed, discuss our initial results, and analyze the effect of intervention on task performance.
Terrence Fong, Jean Scholtz, Julie A. Shah, Lorenzo Flueckiger, Clayton Kunz, David Lees, John Schreiner, Michael D. Siegel, Laura M. Hiatt, Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Reid G. Simmons, Robert O. Ambrose, Robert R. Burridge, Brian Antonishek, Magdalena D. Bugajska, Alan C. Schultz, J. Gregory Trafton
SMC12
2006 Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation
abstract
This paper reports that the superposition of a small set of behaviors, learned via teleoperation, can lead to robust completion of an articulated reach-and-grasp task. The results support the hypothesis that a robot can learn to interact purposefully with its environment through a developmental acquisition of sensory-motor coordination. Teleoperation can bootstrap the process by enabling the robot to observe its own sensory responses to actions that lead to specific outcomes within an environment. It is shown that a reach-and-grasp task, learned by an articulated robot through a small number of teleoperated trials, can be performed autonomously with success in the face of significant variations in the environment and perturbations of the goal. In particular, teleoperation of the robot to reach and grasp an object at nine different locations in its workspace enabled robust autonomous performance of the task anywhere within the workspace. Superpositioning was performed using the Verbs and Adverbs algorithm that was developed originally for the graphical animation of articulated characters. The work was performed on Robonaut, the NASA space-capable humanoid at Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX.
Christina L. Campbell, Richard Alan Peters II, Bobby Bodenheimer, William Bluethmann, Eric Huber, Robert O. Ambrose
IEEE Trans. Robotics6
2005 Robonaut Mobile Autonomy: Initial Experiments
abstract
A mobile version of the NASA/DARPA Robonaut humanoid recently completed initial autonomy trials working directly with humans in cluttered environments. This compact robot combines the upper body of the Robonaut system with a Segway ™ Robotic Mobility Platform yielding a dexterous, maneuverable humanoid ideal for interacting with human co-workers in a range of environments. This system uses stereovision to locate human teammates and tools and a navigation system that uses laser range and vision data to follow humans while avoiding obstacles. Tactile sensors provide information to grasping algorithms for efficient tool exchanges. The autonomous architecture utilizes these pre-programmed skills to form complex behaviors. The initial behavior demonstrates a robust capability to assist a human by acquiring a tool from a remotely located individual and then following the human in a cluttered environment with the tool for future use.
Myron A. Diftler, Robert O. Ambrose, Michael Goza, Kim S. Tyree, Eric Huber
ICRA2
2004 Telepresence control of the NASA/DARPA robonaut on a mobility platform
abstract
Engineers at the Johnson Space Center recently combined the upper body of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) / Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Robonaut system with a Robotic Mobility Platform (RMP) to make an extremely mobile humanoid robot designed to interact with human teammates. Virtual Reality gear that immerses a human operator into Robonaut's working environment provides the primary control pathway for remote operations. Human/robot interface challenges are addressed in the control system for teleoperators, console operators and humans working directly with the Robonaut. Multiple control modes are available for controlling the five fingered dexterous robot hands and operator selectable depending on the type of grasp required. A relative positioning system is used to maximize operator comfort during arm and head motions. Foot pedals control the mobility base. Initial tasks that include working with human rated tools, navigating hallways and cutting wires are presented and show the effectiveness of telepresence control for this class of robot.
Michael Goza, Robert O. Ambrose, Myron A. Diftler, Ivan M. Spain
CHI2
2004 Mobile Manipulation using NASA's Robonaut
abstract
The Johnson Space Center has developed a new mobile manipulation system with the combination of a Robonaut upper body mounted onto a Segway mobile base. The objective is to study a fluid and coordinated control of dexterous limbs on a mobile robot. The system has been demonstrated interacting with people, tools, and urban interfaces built for humans. Human interactions have included manually exchanging objects with humans, following people, and tracking people with hand held objects such as flashlights. Like other configurations of the Robonaut family, the upper body provides dexterity for using tools such as wire cutters, shovels, space flight gear, and handling flexible tethers and fabrics. The Segway base is a custom version called the Robotic Mobility Platform (RMP) built for DARPA, and provided to NASA for this collaborative effort. The RMP's active balance gives Robonaut a relatively small footprint for its height, allowing it to pass through doors and elevators built for humans, and use wheelchair accessible ramps and lifts. Lessons learned from this development are presented to improve the design of future mobile manipulation systems, and the Segway base provides mobility to Robonaut for Earth based testing.
Robert O. Ambrose, Robert T. Savely, Michael Goza, Philip Strawser, Myron A. Diftler, Ivan M. Spain, Nicolaus A. Radford
ICRA1
2004 Tactile Gloves for Autonomous Grasping with the NASA/DARPA Robonaut
abstract
Tactile data from rugged gloves are providing the foundation for developing autonomous grasping skills for the NASA/DARPA Robonaut, a dexterous humanoid robot. These custom gloves compliment the human like dexterity available in the Robonaut hands. Multiple versions of the gloves are discussed, showing a progression in using advanced materials and construction techniques to enhance sensitivity and overall sensor coverage. The force data provided by the gloves can be used to improve dexterous, tool and power grasping primitives. Experiments with the latest gloves focus on the use of tools, specifically a power drill used to approximate an astronaut's torque tool.
Toby B. Martin, Robert O. Ambrose, Myron A. Diftler, Robert Platt 0001, Melissa Butzer
ICRA2
2004 The Challenges of Extra-vehicular Robotic Locomotion aboard Orbiting Spacecraft
abstract
NASA's Human Space Flight program depends heavily on spacewalks performed by human astronauts. These Extra-Vehicular Activities (EVAs) are risky, expensive and complex. In collaboration with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), NASA is developing a robotic astronaut's assistant called Robonaut that can boost EVA productivity and help conserve human EVA hours. Robonaut is an anthropomorphic robot equipped with human-like dexterous manipulation and zero-g locomotion capabilities. In order to move about in a zero-g environment, a robot must be able to climb autonomously, using gaits that smoothly manage its momentum and that minimize contact forces while providing for safety in the event of an emergency requiring the system to stop. All three of these objectives are now being explored at NASA's Johnson Space Center with computer analysis and visualization tools as well as hardware tests involving the Robonaut system and a set of facilities and mockups that emulate the zero-g condition.
Fredrik Rehnmark, Robert O. Ambrose, Michael Goza
ICRA2
2003 Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system
abstract
The NASA/DARPA Robonaut system is evolving from a purely teleoperator controlled anthropomorphic robot towards a humanoid system with multiple control pathways. Robonaut is a human scale robot designed to approach the dexterity of a space suited astronaut. Under teleoperator control, Robonaut has been able to perform many high payoff tasks indicating that it could significantly reduce the maintenance workload for human's working in space. Throughout its development, Robonaut has been augmented to include new sensors and software resulting in increased skills that allow for more shared control with the teleoperator, and ever increasing levels of autonomy. These skills range from simple compliance control, and short term memory, to, most recently, reflexive grasping and haptic object identification using a custom tactile glove, and real-time visual object tracking.
Myron A. Diftler, Robert Platt 0001, C. J. Culbert, Robert O. Ambrose, William Bluethmann
ICRA4
2002 An Automated Tether Management System for Microgravity Extravehicular Activities
abstract
An automated tether system has been developed for the purpose of improving the efficiency of micro-gravity activities of fully suited astronauts. System features include gripping of multiple anchor types, remote release of the tether from an anchor, and controlled retraction of the tether. Two main mechanisms make up the system. First, a remotely releasable, self-locking robotic gripper with opposing jaws that grasps a variety of anchors such as handrails, tether loops, and guide wires. Second, an automated tether retractor that is capable of active or passive operation. Passive retractor operation saves power by emulating existing safety tether systems and active operation expedites tether retraction and allows towing.
Mark A. Minor, Christopher R. Hirschi, Robert O. Ambrose
ICRA3
1998 The Minimum Form of Strength in Serial, Parallel and Bifurcated Manipulators
abstract
The described mathematical formulations answer the questions "how strong is enough?", "strong in which direction?", and "where is the weakest link?" that robot designers face in the early stages of matching tasks with robotic mechanisms. This work produces 3D visualizations of robot strengths and weaknesses across their dexterous workspaces, aiding interactive manipulator joint and kinematic design. Strength is defined here as the maximum force or moment that the robot can exert on the environment at its point of resolution. This strength is a 6/spl times/1 vector for spatial mechanisms, comprising forces and moments resolved in a global frame. The three factors studied in this work are the design of the manipulator's drive trains, the chain's kinematic parameters, and the articulation of kinematic redundancies as self motion. The mathematical formulation is implemented as a minimum of a set of serial strengths, within which can exist parallel sets as appropriate for the mechanism's kinematics. The strength model is first developed for serial chains, broadened to the statically indeterminant cases of parallel chains, and then applied to a bifurcated system of chains in development at NASA. This work's primary objective is to bring to bear in robot design the mathematical principles usually reserved for robot modeling and control. After a robot has been built, it is often too late to fix a mechanism's many weaknesses. It is our belief that the Jacobian has as much to teach robot designers as it has taught students of dynamics and control theory.
Robert O. Ambrose, Myron A. Diftler
ICRA1
1997 Automation of bioregenerative habitats for space environments
abstract
Long duration manned missions to explore new environments require habitats with automated bioregenerative life support systems, since resupply from Earth is not feasible. Bioplex, the ground facility proposed by NASA Johnson Space Center for bioregenerative life support research, consists of cylindrical modules including biomass chambers that provide food and oxygen to support crew survival. Manual duties involved in processing and maintaining crops consume more calories that the crops can reasonably produce. Decreasing risk in the hazardous environment of distant closed systems, automation of crop tasks saves time and energy, reduces crew exposure to mold and exposed harvesting machinery, and improves efficiency. Automation needs are many in Bioplex but heavy hauling and lifting consume a substantial amount of calories, since the corridors in the chamber are narrow and cramped. Various configurations of a tray handling system, Traybot, were explored, resulting in an overhead two-rail system with a vertically driven basket. Modes of operation for harvest cycles determined the requirements for the chassis, basket, power, actuator and control components. In a hazardous environment, working along side humans demanded flexibility in design and control of Traybot. The Bioplex study found that Traybot's role is crucial to survival in space habitats.
Kristin M. Lai-Fook, Robert O. Ambrose
ICRA2
1995 Interactive Robot Joint Design, Analysis and Prototyping
abstract
NASA's Johnson Space Center has developed a general geometric model of a manipulator joint that allows for the interactive design and analysis of robot prototypes. The interactive design software analyzes joint geometries for various performance issues, and has been connected to a Stereolithography Apparatus (SLA) for the rapid production of full scale mechanism models. The software, called Module Maker, uses variational geometry to connect the joint model's 36 independent, geometric variables with over 100 dependent values that define the solids of a general 2 degree of freedom joint. A user can interactively "stretch" and edit the joint's structure, with a 3D rendering that updates in real time, while displaying numeric values for review. Analysis routines developed to support the interactive design process include a general evaluation of the joint's new range of motion, weight, moments of inertia, centroids, heat transfer coefficients and a calculation of the joint's Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) parameters. The final step in the design cycle is to prototype the module elements using an SLA that make full scale, polyurethane components.
Robert O. Ambrose
ICRA1
1995 Robots Models for Space Enviroments
abstract
The models developed here apply to both robot domains, where extreme thermal or precision conditions require a fundamental understanding of robot thermodynamics and heat transfer mechanisms that deform manipulators. A transient, 3D finite difference model is presented for tracking heat generated by actuators, conducted through the manipulator, radiated to space and absorbed from solar flux. Unlike large space cranes, the closely positioned actuators in small fine arms require modeling of energy exchange between joints, and simulations show that this heat transfer is governed by bearing elements. The consequences of torque histories can be predicted using these models, which link dynamics to future thermal states, and their resulting structural expansions and contractions. Thermal models can be coupled with distributed sensing to anticipate deformations in robots under operation in space conditions, improving precision and reducing the need for repeated calibration.
Robert O. Ambrose, Catherine G. Ambrose
ICRA1
1995 An Experimental Investigation of Actuators for Space Robots
abstract
A two degree of freedom robot joint module was designed and built for the space environment, and evaluated in a thermal vacuum chamber at NASA's Johnson Space Center. The hypothesis was that servo dynamics would change across the wide temperature range of space, and a series of chamber experiments showed thermal adaptation is required to maintain response and stability over the EVA range of 223-373 K. A key finding was that control parameters selected for optimum dynamic response at room temperature were found to be inappropriate across the thermal vacuum range. At cold temperatures (233 K) the nominal gains were found to produce a critically damped response with large steady state error. At warm temperatures, the response was underdamped with significant overshoot, and at hot temperatures (353 K) the system went unstable, using gains that were optimal at room temperature. At each of seven thermal vacuum states, gains were found to deliver the desired dynamic response, and those settings were recorded.
Robert O. Ambrose, R. Scott Askew
ICRA1