Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vijay Pappu
dblp:68/11375
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research
user engagement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022 |
Empirical software engineering › controlled experiment
online controlled experiments |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survival models · 1.7a/b testing · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Timely Personalization at Peloton: A System and Algorithm for Boosting Time-Relevant ContentabstractAt Peloton, we are challenged to not just surface relevant recommendations of fitness classes to our members, but also timely ones. As our fitness content library expands, we continually produce classes on certain themes which are most timely during a narrow time window. To address this challenge, we provide some control over our recommendations to external stakeholders, such as production and marketing teams. They enter timed boosts of certain classes during the windows they are relevant in. We have built out algorithms which take these desired classes and elevate the number of impressions for them, while preserving members’ engagement with our recommendations. In this paper, we discuss the system, the algorithms and some results from a few A/B tests showing how boosting works in practice. Shayak Banerjee, Vijay Pappu, Nilothpal Talukder, Shoya Yoshida, Arnab Bhadury, Allison Schloss, Jasmine Paulino |
RecSys | 2 |
| 2022 | Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online ExperimentsabstractOnline controlled experiments, in which different variants of a product are compared based on an Overall Evaluation Criterion (OEC), have emerged as a gold standard for decision making in online services. It is vital that the OEC is aligned with the overall goal of stakeholders for effective decision making. However, this is a challenge when the overall goal is not immediately observable. For instance, we might want to understand the effect of deploying a feature on long-term retention, where the outcome (retention) is not observable at the end of an A/B test. Praveen Chandar, Brian St. Thomas, Lucas Maystre, Vijay Pappu, Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda, Tiffany Wu, Ben Carterette, Mounia Lalmas-Roelleke, Tony Jebara |
WWW | 4 |
| 2015 | Sparse Proximal Support Vector Machines for feature selection in high dimensional datasets
Vijay Pappu, Orestis P. Panagopoulos, Petros Xanthopoulos, Panos M. Pardalos |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |