Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leif C. Denby

dblp:71/1210 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7611-9222ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › topological data analysis
merge tree
0.912025
Multi-Field Visualization: Trait Design and Trait-Induced Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics › scientific visualization
multifield visualization
0.912025
Multi-Field Visualization: Trait Design and Trait-Induced Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics
topological data analysis
0.912025
Multi-Field Visualization: Trait Design and Trait-Induced Merge Trees · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Interaction techniques and input › pen input
handwriting recognition
0.112009
Text entry performance of state of the art unconstrained handwriting recognition: a longitudinal user study · CHI 2009
Interaction techniques and input
text entry
0.112009
Text entry performance of state of the art unconstrained handwriting recognition: a longitudinal user study · CHI 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trait-induced merge tree · 0.9dictionary learning · 0.9cartesian trait decomposition · 0.9longitudinal user study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-Field Visualization: Trait Design and Trait-Induced Merge Trees
abstract
Feature level sets (FLS) have shown significant potential in the analysis of multi-field data by using traits defined in attribute space to specify features in the domain. In this work, we address key challenges in the practical use of FLS: trait design and feature selection for rendering. To simplify trait design, we propose a Cartesian decomposition of traits into simpler components, making the process more intuitive and computationally efficient. Additionally, we utilize dictionary learning results to automatically suggest point traits. To enhance feature selection, we introduce trait-induced merge trees (TIMTs), a generalization of merge trees for feature level sets, aimed at topologically analyzing tensor fields or general multi-variate data. The leaves in the TIMT represent areas in the input data that are closest to the defined trait, thereby most closely resembling the defined feature. This merge tree provides a hierarchy of features, enabling the querying of the most relevant and persistent features. Our method includes various query techniques for the tree, allowing the highlighting of different aspects. We demonstrate the cross-application capabilities of this approach through five case studies from different domains.
Danhua Lei, Jochen Jankowai, Petar Hristov, Hamish A. Carr, Leif C. Denby, Talha Bin Masood, Ingrid Hotz
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.5
2009 Text entry performance of state of the art unconstrained handwriting recognition: a longitudinal user study
abstract
We report on a longitudinal study of unconstrained handwriting recognition performance. After 250 minutes of practice, participants had a mean text entry rate of 24.1 wpm. For the first four hours of usage, entry and error rates of handwriting recognition are about the same as for a baseline QWERTY software keyboard. Our results reveal that unconstrained handwriting is faster than what was previously assumed in the text entry literature.
Per Ola Kristensson, Leif C. Denby
CHI2