Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John B. Smelcer
dblp:71/4794
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Interaction techniques and input · 49% Usability and user experience research · 28% User interface design and tools · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction techniques and input › selection techniques › command selection › menu interaction
menu selection |
0.0 | 2 | 1991 | Optimizing Speed and Accuracy of Menu Selection: A Comparison of Walking and Pull-Down Menus · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1991 A comparison of selection time from walking and pull-down menus · CHI 1990 |
Query processing and optimization › query rewriting › query transformation
query composition |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | User errors in database query composition · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
controlled experiment · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | User errors in database query composition
John B. Smelcer |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 1993 | Transfer of knowledge across computer command menusabstractTwo experiments are reported that examine the effects of menu organization and command naming on performance within and across computer command menus. The work on performance within menus extends prior work on information retrieval (IR) menus to computer command menus. We found that selection of computer commands conforms to the same laws that govern selection of IR categories and object names, with alphabetic organization leading to shorter search times in early trials when users knew the names of the commands. When users did not know the exact names of the commands, the functional organization led to shorter search times. More importantly, we found that the knowledge of the functional organization transferred from one application menu to another, thereby reducing search time in the menu of the second application. John B. Smelcer, Neff Walker |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. | 1 |
| 1991 | Optimizing Speed and Accuracy of Menu Selection: A Comparison of Walking and Pull-Down Menus
Neff Walker, John B. Smelcer, Erik Nilsen |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 2 |
| 1990 | A comparison of selection time from walking and pull-down menusabstractThis paper reports on an experiment that investigated factors which effect selection time from walking menus and bar or pull-down menus. The primary focus was on the use of impenetrable borders and on expanding target areas on the two menus types. The results show that both factors can be used to facilitate menu selection, with the use of borders being most beneficial. In addition, the results suggest that even on large monitors, the time required to access items from a bar menu is less than that required for the best walking menu. Neff Walker, John B. Smelcer |
CHI | 2 |