Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lea Lindemann

dblp:74/10700 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
artifact perception
0.112012
EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.112012
EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012
Wearable and physiological sensing › electroencephalography
EEG-based evaluation
0.012012
EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

electroencephalography · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception
abstract
Image Based Rendering (IBR) allows interactive scene exploration from images alone. However, despite considerable development in the area, one of the main obstacles to better quality and more realistic visualizations is the occurrence of visually disagreeable artifacts. In this paper we present a methodology to map out the perception of IBR-typical artifacts. This work presents an alternative to traditional image and video quality evaluation methods by using an EEG device to determine the implicit visual processes in the human brain. Our work demonstrates the distinct differences in the perception of different types of visual artifacts and the implications of these differences.
Maryam Mustafa, Lea Lindemann, Marcus A. Magnor
CHI2
2011 Assessing the quality of compressed images using EEG
abstract
The way images are perceived by a human observer is becoming increasingly important in visual media, e.g. for (photo-) realistic image synthesis or memory-efficient encoding of large volumes of image/video data. Traditionally, perceived image quality is assessed by either using specially developed image quality metrics or by conducting user studies. In this paper, we investigate the use of electroencephalography as a tool for evaluating image quality. We demonstrate that the presence of artifacts reliably elicits a measurable response in the brain. We furthermore show that the reaction varies depending on the severity of artifacts, so that it may be used in order to objectively quantify image quality.
Lea Lindemann, Marcus A. Magnor
ICIP1