Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lea Lindemann
dblp:74/10700
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
artifact perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012 |
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › electroencephalography
EEG-based evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | EEG analysis of implicit human visual perception · CHI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
electroencephalography · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | EEG analysis of implicit human visual perceptionabstractImage Based Rendering (IBR) allows interactive scene exploration from images alone. However, despite considerable development in the area, one of the main obstacles to better quality and more realistic visualizations is the occurrence of visually disagreeable artifacts. In this paper we present a methodology to map out the perception of IBR-typical artifacts. This work presents an alternative to traditional image and video quality evaluation methods by using an EEG device to determine the implicit visual processes in the human brain. Our work demonstrates the distinct differences in the perception of different types of visual artifacts and the implications of these differences. Maryam Mustafa, Lea Lindemann, Marcus A. Magnor |
CHI | 2 |
| 2011 | Assessing the quality of compressed images using EEGabstractThe way images are perceived by a human observer is becoming increasingly important in visual media, e.g. for (photo-) realistic image synthesis or memory-efficient encoding of large volumes of image/video data. Traditionally, perceived image quality is assessed by either using specially developed image quality metrics or by conducting user studies. In this paper, we investigate the use of electroencephalography as a tool for evaluating image quality. We demonstrate that the presence of artifacts reliably elicits a measurable response in the brain. We furthermore show that the reaction varies depending on the severity of artifacts, so that it may be used in order to objectively quantify image quality. Lea Lindemann, Marcus A. Magnor |
ICIP | 1 |