Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Hagemann

dblp:76/2949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 67% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 33%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Runtime systems and virtual machines
garbage collection
0.011986
A Structural View of the Cedar Programming Environment · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1986
Programming languages and type systems
programming environment
0.011986
A Structural View of the Cedar Programming Environment · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system design · 0.0comparative analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 A Structural View of the Cedar Programming Environment
abstract
This paper presents an overview of the Cedar programming environment, focusing on its overall structure—that is, the major components of Cedar and the way they are organized. Cedar supports the development of programs written in a single programming language, also called Cedar. Its primary purpose is to increase the productivity of programmers whose activities include experimental programming and the development of prototype software systems for a high-performance personal computer. The paper emphasizes the extent to which the Cedar language, with run-time support, has influenced the organization, flexibility, usefulness, and stability of the Cedar environment. It highlights the novel system features of Cedar, including automatic storage management of dynamically allocated typed values, a run-time type system that provides run-time access to Cedar data type definitions and allows interpretive manipulation of typed values, and a powerful device-independent imaging model that supports the user interface facilities. Using these discussions to set the context, the paper addresses the language and system features and the methodologies used to facilitate the integration of Cedar applications. A comparison of Cedar with other programming environments further identifies areas where Cedar excels and areas where work remains to be done.
Daniel C. Swinehart, Polle Zellweger, Richard J. Beach, Robert Hagemann
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.4