Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stijn De Saeger

dblp:76/4297 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 69% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Question answering and dialogue systems · 10%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.222009
Large Scale Relation Acquisition Using Class Dependent Patterns · ICDM 2009
Large-Scale Verb Entailment Acquisition from the Web · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering
0.212013
Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations · ACL (1) 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.112012
Excitatory or Inhibitory: A New Semantic Orientation Extracts Contradiction and Causality from the Web · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
paraphrase extraction
0.112011
Extracting Paraphrases from Definition Sentences on the Web · ACL 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112010
A Bayesian Method for Robust Estimation of Distributional Similarities · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › distributional semantics
distributional similarity
0.112010
A Bayesian Method for Robust Estimation of Distributional Similarities · ACL 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › semantic relations
hypernym discovery
0.112009
Hypernym Discovery Based on Distributional Similarity and Hierarchical Structures · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction
0.012013
Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations · ACL (1) 2013
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.012013
Aid is Out There: Looking for Help from Tweets during a Large Scale Disaster · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.012012
Why Question Answering using Sentiment Analysis and Word Classes · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
web text mining
0.012011
Extracting Paraphrases from Definition Sentences on the Web · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
pattern learning
0.012009
Large Scale Relation Acquisition Using Class Dependent Patterns · ICDM 2009
Web and social media mining › web mining
web text mining
0.012009
Large-Scale Verb Entailment Acquisition from the Web · EMNLP 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tweet analysis · 0.3distributional similarity · 0.3web-scale pattern extraction · 0.2supervised classification · 0.2word classes · 0.1web-based pattern mining · 0.1semantic orientation · 0.1partial pattern matching · 0.1paraphrase extraction · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations
Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Motoki Sano, Stijn De Saeger, Kiyonori Ohtake
ACL (1)5
2013 Aid is Out There: Looking for Help from Tweets during a Large Scale Disaster
István Varga, Motoki Sano, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Kiyonori Ohtake, Takao Kawai, Jong-Hoon Oh, Stijn De Saeger
ACL (1)8
2013 Two-Stage Method for Large-Scale Acquisition of Contradiction Pattern Pairs using Entailment
abstract
Julien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2013.
Julien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake
EMNLP2
2013 NICT Disaster Information Analysis System
Kiyonori Ohtake, Jun Goto, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Junta Mizuno, Kentaro Inui
IJCNLP3
2013 WISDOM2013: A Large-scale Web Information Analysis System
Masahiro Tanaka, Stijn De Saeger, Kiyonori Ohtake, Chikara Hashimoto, Makoto Hijiya, Hideaki Fujii, Kentaro Torisawa
IJCNLP2
2013 Minimally Supervised Method for Multilingual Paraphrase Extraction from Definition Sentences on the Web
Yulan Yan, Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Takao Kawai, Jun'ichi Kazama, Stijn De Saeger
HLT-NAACL6
2012 Excitatory or Inhibitory: A New Semantic Orientation Extracts Contradiction and Causality from the Web
Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Stijn De Saeger, Jong-Hoon Oh, Jun'ichi Kazama
EMNLP-CoNLL3
2012 Why Question Answering using Sentiment Analysis and Word Classes
Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Takuya Kawada, Stijn De Saeger, Jun'ichi Kazama, Yiou Wang
EMNLP-CoNLL5
2011 Extracting Paraphrases from Definition Sentences on the Web
Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Stijn De Saeger, Jun'ichi Kazama, Sadao Kurohashi
ACL3
2011 Relation Acquisition using Word Classes and Partial Patterns
Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Masaaki Tsuchida, Jun'ichi Kazama, Chikara Hashimoto, Ichiro Yamada, Jong-Hoon Oh, István Varga, Yulan Yan
EMNLP1
2011 Toward Finding Semantic Relations not Written in a Single Sentence: An Inference Method using Auto-Discovered Rules
Masaaki Tsuchida, Kentaro Torisawa, Stijn De Saeger, Jong-Hoon Oh, Jun'ichi Kazama, Chikara Hashimoto, Hayato Ohwada
IJCNLP3
2011 Similarity Based Language Model Construction for Voice Activated Open-Domain Question Answering
István Varga, Kiyonori Ohtake, Kentaro Torisawa, Stijn De Saeger, Teruhisa Misu, Shigeki Matsuda, Jun'ichi Kazama
IJCNLP4
2011 Extending WordNet with Hypernyms and Siblings Acquired from Wikipedia
Ichiro Yamada, Jong-Hoon Oh, Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Jun'ichi Kazama, Stijn De Saeger, Takuya Kawada
IJCNLP6
2010 A Bayesian Method for Robust Estimation of Distributional Similarities
Jun'ichi Kazama, Stijn De Saeger, Kow Kuroda, Masaki Murata, Kentaro Torisawa
ACL2
2010 Co-STAR: A Co-training Style Algorithm for Hyponymy Relation Acquisition from Structured and Unstructured Text
Jong-Hoon Oh, Ichiro Yamada, Kentaro Torisawa, Stijn De Saeger
COLING4
2010 Generation of Summaries that Appropriately and Adequately Express the Contents of Original Documents Using Word-Association Knowledge
Kazuki Takigawa, Masaki Murata, Masaaki Tsuchida, Stijn De Saeger, Kazuhide Yamamoto, Kentaro Torisawa
PACLIC4
2009 Large-Scale Verb Entailment Acquisition from the Web
Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Kow Kuroda, Stijn De Saeger, Masaki Murata, Jun'ichi Kazama
EMNLP4
2009 Hypernym Discovery Based on Distributional Similarity and Hierarchical Structures
Ichiro Yamada, Kentaro Torisawa, Jun'ichi Kazama, Kow Kuroda, Masaki Murata, Stijn De Saeger, Francis Bond, Asuka Sumida
EMNLP6
2009 Large Scale Relation Acquisition Using Class Dependent Patterns
abstract
This paper proposes a minimally supervised method for acquiring high-level semantic relations such as causality and prevention from the Web. Our method learns linguistic patterns that express causality such as “x gave rise to y”, and uses them to extract causal noun pairs like (global warming, malaria epidemic) from sentences like “global warming gave rise to a new malaria epidemic”. The novelty of our method lies in the use of semantic word classes acquired by large scale clustering for learning class dependent patterns. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this class based approach on three large-scale relation mining tasks from 50 million Japanese Web pages. In two of these tasks we obtained more than 30,000 relation instances with over 80% precision, outperforming a state-of-the-art system by a large margin.
Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Jun'ichi Kazama, Kow Kuroda, Masaki Murata
ICDM1
2008 Looking for Trouble
Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Jun'ichi Kazama
COLING1