Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeff Shrager

dblp:77/3472 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
21ranked-venue papers
10as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7007-6305ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
User interface design and tools · 49% Interaction techniques and input · 49% Learning and educational technologies · 2%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 61% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Information extraction and text analysis · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › user interface architecture
window management
0.112008
Taskposé: exploring fluid boundaries in an associative window visualization · UIST 2008
Interaction techniques and input › desktop interaction
window switching
0.112008
Taskposé: exploring fluid boundaries in an associative window visualization · UIST 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
bioinformatic tool integration
0.012005
BioLingua: a programmable knowledge environment for biologists · Bioinform. 2005
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
chunking
0.011987
John Laird, Paul Rosenbloom and Allen Newell, Universal Subgoaling and Chunking: The Automatic Generation and Learning of Goal Hierarchies · Artif. Intell. 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
inductive learning
0.011986
Instructionless Learning about a Complex Device: The Paradigm and Observations · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1986
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems
0.011982
An Expert System That Volunteers Advice · AAAI 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

windowrank algorithm · 0.1user study · 0.1symbolic programming · 0.1end-user programming · 0.1induction · 0.0subgoaling · 0.0chunking · 0.0protocol analysis · 0.0observation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Virtual Trials: Causally-validated treatment effects efficiently learned from an observational cancer registry
abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offer a clear causal interpretation of treatment effects, but are inefficient in terms of information gain per patient. Moreover, because they are intended to test cohort-level effects, RCTs rarely provide information to support precision medicine, which strives to choose the best treatment for an individual patient. If causal information could be efficiently extracted from widely available real-world data, the rapidity of treatment validation could be increased, and its costs reduced. Moreover, inferences could be made across larger, more diverse patient populations. We created a "virtual trial" by fitting a multilevel Bayesian survival model to treatment and outcome records self-reported by 451 brain cancer patients. The model recovers group-level treatment effects comparable to RCTs representing over 3200 patients. The model additionally discovers the feature-treatment interactions needed to make individual-level predictions for precision medicine. By learning from heterogeneous real-world data, virtual trials can generate more causal estimates with fewer patients than RCTs, and they can do so without artificially limiting the patient population. This demonstrates the value of virtual trials as a complement to large randomized controlled trials, especially in highly heterogeneous or rare diseases.
Asher Wasserman, Al Musella, Mark Shapiro, Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell. Medicine4
2018 Prototyping a precision oncology 3.0 rapid learning platform
abstract
BACKGROUND: We describe a prototype implementation of a platform that could underlie a Precision Oncology Rapid Learning system. RESULTS: We describe the prototype platform, and examine some important issues and details. In the Appendix we provide a complete walk-through of the prototype platform. CONCLUSIONS: The design choices made in this implementation rest upon ten constitutive hypotheses, which, taken together, define a particular view of how a rapid learning medical platform might be defined, organized, and implemented.
Connor Sweetnam, Simone Mocellin, Michael Krauthammer, Nathaniel Knopf, Robert Baertsch, Jeff Shrager
BMC Bioinform.6
2014 Inconsistency Monitoring in a Large Scientific Knowledge Base
Vinay K. Chaudhri, Rahul Katragadda, Jeff Shrager, Michael A. Wessel
EKAW3
2013 Blend me in: Privacy-preserving input generalization for personalized online services
abstract
Users routinely disclose personal information to obtain the benefits of Personalized Online Services. As a result, personal data is distributed across uncounted and unaccountable remote databases. Data mismanagement, as well as privacy and security flaws undermine individuals' control and privacy of their personal data. Yet revealing detailed private data does not necessarily yield useful service personalization; often this functionality is only modestly dependent upon the accuracy of user-supplied input. We demonstrate knowledge-based input generalization wherein systematically perturbed user data is supplied to a personalized service to gain forward privacy for the user, while retaining the utility of the service's results.
Alegria Baquero, Allan M. Schiffman, Jeff Shrager
PST3
2008 Taskposé: exploring fluid boundaries in an associative window visualization
abstract
Window management research has aimed to leverage users' tasks to organize the growing number of open windows in a useful manner. This research has largely assumed task classifications to be binary -- either a window is in a task, or not -- and context-independent. We suggest that the continual evolution of tasks can invalidate this approach and instead propose a fuzzy association model in which windows are related to one another by varying degrees. Task groupings are an emergent property of our approach. To support the association model, we introduce the WindowRank algorithm and its use in determining window association. We then describe Taskposé, a prototype window switch visualization embodying these ideas, and report on a week-long user study of the system.
Michael S. Bernstein, Jeff Shrager, Terry Winograd
UIST2
2008 The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-supported Collaborative Analysis
Gregorio Convertino, Dorrit Billman, Peter Pirolli, J. P. Massar, Jeff Shrager
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.5
2006 Constructing explanatory process models from biological data and knowledge
Pat Langley, Oren Shiran, Jeff Shrager, Ljupco Todorovski, Andrew Pohorille
Artif. Intell. Medicine3
2005 BioLingua: a programmable knowledge environment for biologists
abstract
UNLABELLED: BioLingua is an interactive, web-based programming environment that enables biologists to analyze biological systems by combining knowledge and data through direct end-user programming. BioLingua embeds a mature symbolic programming language in a frame-based knowledge environment, integrating genomic and pathway knowledge about a class of similar organisms. The BioLingua language provides interfaces to numerous state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools, making these available as an integrated package through the novel use of web-based programmability and an integrated Wiki-based community code and data store. The pilot instantiation of BioLingua, which has been developed in collaboration with several cyanobacteriologists, integrates knowledge about a subset of cyanobacteria with the Gene Ontology, KEGG and BioCyc knowledge bases. We introduce the BioLingua concept, architecture and language, and give several examples of its use in complex analyses. AVAILABILITY: Extensive documentation is available online at http://nostoc.stanford.edu/Docs/index.html CONTACT: [email protected]
J. P. Massar, Michael Travers, Jeff Elhai, Jeff Shrager
Bioinform.4
2003 Inducing Biological Models from Temporal Gene Expression Data
Kazumi Saito, Dileep George, Stephen D. Bay, Jeff Shrager
Discovery Science4
2003 The fiction of function
abstract
Department of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Instution of Washington, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Jeff Shrager
Bioinform.1
2002 Revising regulatory networks: from expression data to linear causal models
Stephen D. Bay, Jeff Shrager, Andrew Pohorille, Pat Langley
J. Biomed. Informatics2
1996 Dynamic Plasticity Influences the Emergence of Function in a Simple Cortical Array
Jeff Shrager, Mark H. Johnson
Neural Networks1
1989 John H. Holland, Keith J. Holyoak, Richard E. Nisbett, and Paul R. Thagard, Induction: Process of Inference, Learning and Discovery
Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell.1
1988 Causes to clauses: Managing assumptions in qualitative medical diagnosis
Keith L. Downing, Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell. Eng.2
1988 Issues and directions in qualitative physics: special editions from the 1987 workshop
Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell. Eng.1
1988 Continued monitoring of the state of qualitative physics
Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell. Eng.1
1987 John Laird, Paul Rosenbloom and Allen Newell, Universal Subgoaling and Chunking: The Automatic Generation and Learning of Goal Hierarchies
Jeff Shrager
Artif. Intell.1
1987 Theory Change via View Application in Instructionless Learning
Jeff Shrager
Mach. Learn.1
1986 Instructionless Learning about a Complex Device: The Paradigm and Observations
Jeff Shrager, David Klahr
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1
1983 Learning in an instructionless environment: Observation and analysis
abstract
In an instructionless environment, there are neither teachers nor books. The only feedback comes from interaction with the target. All information appears from within the subject or from observation of the environment. In this setting, subjects rely upon experimentation to develop an understanding of the target. They form hypotheses by analogy or inference and test these hypotheses via experiments of calibration, replication, confirmation, exploration, and discrimination.
Jeff Shrager, David Klahr
CHI1
1982 An Expert System That Volunteers Advice
Jeff Shrager, Tim Finin
AAAI1