Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Svetlin Denkov

dblp:77/9543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › text entry
keyboard interaction
0.112011
Categorization costs for hierarchical keyboard commands · CHI 2011
Interaction techniques and input › selection techniques › command selection › menu interaction
menu selection
0.012011
Categorization costs for hierarchical keyboard commands · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.1cognitive modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Categorization costs for hierarchical keyboard commands
abstract
Previous research comparing methods of issuing commands found that selecting a toolbar item is faster than selecting an item from two menus with either a mouse or keyboard shortcut. Over the course of 90 trials, however, the keyboard method showed the most improvement, nearing the toolbar response time. The study presented in this paper compared the response time of the keyboard method across 240 trials when items were drawn from a single versus two menus. Throughout the trials, the 1-menu condition produced selection times that were on average 600 ms to 800 ms faster than the 2-menu condition suggesting users in the 2-menu condition were not able to bypass the menu decision by chunking the 3-key sequence into one cognitive unit. Models are presented to describe performance at various stages of learning. Practical implications are that hierarchical, category-based keyboard commands do not provide a clear advantage to toolbar-based selection and that theory-based evaluation methods may need to reflect this result.
Craig S. Miller, Svetlin Denkov, Richard C. Omanson
CHI2