Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shudan Zhang
dblp:78/8389
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 50% Multi-agent systems · 25% Video understanding and tracking · 12% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | AndroidGen: Building an Android Language Agent under Data Scarcity · ACL (1) 2025 AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents · ICLR 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
autonomous agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › autonomous agents
embodied agent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VisualAgentBench: Towards Large Multimodal Models as Visual Foundation Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
trajectory learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AndroidGen: Building an Android Language Agent under Data Scarcity · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
LLM agent evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents · ICLR 2024 |
Human-AI interaction
GUI agent |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | VisualAgentBench: Towards Large Multimodal Models as Visual Foundation Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program-based solver · 1.7human demonstration · 1.7agent bootstrapping · 1.7reinforcement learning · 0.9large language model · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AndroidGen: Building an Android Language Agent under Data ScarcityabstractLarge language models have opened up a world of possibilities for various NLP tasks, sparking optimism for the future.Despite their potential, LLMs have yet to be widely used as agents on real mobile devices.The main challenge is the need for high-quality data sources.Time constraints and labor intensity often hinder human annotation.On the other hand, existing LLMs exhibit inadequate completion rates and need a robust data filtration strategy.Given these challenges, we develop a framework called ANDROIDGEN to enhance the capabilities of LLM-based agents under data scarcity.In addition, we leverage AN-DROIDGEN to collect trajectories given human tasks and train open-source LLMs on these trajectories to develop an open-source mobile agent without manually labeled trajectories.We extensively evaluate ANDROIDGEN with AndroidWorld, AitW, and various popular applications, demonstrating its improvements and revealing potential areas for future improvement.Code, model, and data are available at https://github.com/THUDM/AndroidGen. Hanyu Lai, Xiao Liu 0036, Yifan Xu 0014, Shudan Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous AgentsabstractYifan Xu, Xiao Liu, Xueqiao Sun, Siyi Cheng, Hao Yu, Hanyu Lai, Shudan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Jie Tang, Yuxiao Dong. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Yifan Xu 0014, Xiao Liu 0036, Xueqiao Sun, Hao Yu 0030, Hanyu Lai, Shudan Zhang, Jie Tang 0001, Yuxiao Dong |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2025 | VisualAgentBench: Towards Large Multimodal Models as Visual Foundation AgentsabstractLarge Multimodal Models (LMMs) have ushered in a new era in artificial intelligence, merging capabilities in both language and vision to form highly capable \textbf{Visual Foundation Agents} that are postulated to excel across a myriad of tasks. However, existing benchmarks fail to sufficiently challenge or showcase the full potential of LMMs as visual foundation agents in complex, real-world environments. To address this gap, we introduce VisualAgentBench (VAB), a comprehensive and unified benchmark specifically designed to train and evaluate LMMs as visual foundation agents across diverse scenarios in one standard setting, including Embodied, Graphical User Interface, and Visual Design, with tasks formulated to probe the depth of LMMs' understanding and interaction capabilities. Through rigorous testing across 9 proprietary LMM APIs and 9 open models (18 in total), we demonstrate the considerable yet still developing visual agent capabilities of these models. Additionally, VAB explores the synthesizing of visual agent trajectory data through hybrid methods including Program-based Solvers, LMM Agent Bootstrapping, and Human Demonstrations, offering insights into obstacles, solutions, and trade-offs one may meet in developing open LMM agents. Our work not only aims to benchmark existing models but also provides an instrumental playground for future development into visual foundation agents. Code, train, and test data are available at \url{https://github.com/THUDM/VisualAgentBench}. Xiao Liu 0036, Tianjie Zhang, Yu Gu 0016, Iat Long Iong, Xixuan Song, Yifan Xu 0014, Shudan Zhang, Hanyu Lai, Jiadai Sun, Zehan Qi, Shuntian Yao, Xueqiao Sun, Qinkai Zheng, Hao Yu 0030, Hanchen Zhang, Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding 0004, Lihang Pan, Xiaotao Gu, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chan Hee Song, Yu Su 0001, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001 |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2024 | AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsabstractThe potential of Large Language Model (LLM) as agents has been widely acknowledged recently.
Thus, there is an urgent need to quantitatively evaluate LLMs as agents on challenging tasks in interactive environments.
We present AgentBench, a multi-dimensional benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
Our extensive test over 29 API-based and open-sourced (OSS) LLMs shows that, while top commercial LLMs present a strong ability of acting as agents in complex environments, there is a significant disparity in performance between them and many OSS competitors that are no larger than 70B.
We identify the typical reasons of failures in environments and LLMs, showing that poor long-term reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following abilities are the main obstacles for developing usable LLM agents.
Improving instruction following and training on high quality multi-round alignment data could improve agent performance.
And different from existing assumptions, training on code present ambivalent impacts on different agent tasks.
Datasets, environments, and an integrated evaluation package for AgentBench are released at https://github.com/THUDM/AgentBench. Xiao Liu 0036, Hao Yu 0030, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu 0014, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu 0016, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, Shudan Zhang, Xiang Deng 0001, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Sheng Shen 0001, Tianjun Zhang, Yu Su 0001, Huan Sun 0001, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001 |
ICLR | 11 |