Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Uta Pankoke-Babatz

dblp:80/1744 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 8 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Empirical software engineering · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.021998
Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use · CSCW 1998
The AMIGO Project: advanced group communication model for computer-based communications environment · CSCW 1986
Collaborative and social computing › groupware
groupware design
0.011998
Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use · CSCW 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis
0.011998
Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use · CSCW 1998
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements elicitation
user participation
0.011998
Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use · CSCW 1998
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.011998
Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use · CSCW 1998
Collaborative and social computing › social interaction
group communication
0.011986
The AMIGO Project: advanced group communication model for computer-based communications environment · CSCW 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototyping · 0.0longitudinal field study · 0.0group communication model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Documented Norms and Conventions on the Internet
abstract
TheInternet plays an important role as a means for world wide social contact. The establishment and maintenance of social and group relationships within electronic worlds require social norms and behavioral conventions as in the real world. This article investigates some of the available electronic media: e-mail, mailing lists, newsgroups, chat rooms, and multiuser dungeons or multiuser domains (MUDs). Peculiarities of the media are analyzed through studying the documented behavioral norms and social conventions. We look at desired behavior, disruptive behavior, and sanction mechanisms. A conclusion that may be drawn is that within these virtual environments, explicitly documented norms and conventions play an underlying role in how individuals behave in addition to what type of behavior they expect from others.
Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Phillip Jeffrey
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.1
2000 Supporting the Distributed German Government with POLITeam
Markus Sohlenkamp, Peter Mambrey, Wolfgang Prinz, Ludwin Fuchs, Anja Syri, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Konrad Klöckner, Sabine Kolvenbach
Multim. Tools Appl.6
1999 Experiences with a cooperative design process in developing a telecooperation system for collaborative document production
abstract
This paper describes a cooperative design approach and the experiences collected when applying this approach for developing and introducing a groupware system for the support of collaborative document processing in a geographically distributed ministerial environment. Methods were developed for the elicitation and analysis of explicit and tacit user requirements in work practice. The combination of these methods facilitated a mutual learning process between users and designers. These methods include interviews, laboratory workshops, user and designer workshops, as well as mediation by user advocates who explore users' needs during regular site visits. A portrait of the various methods is given, followed by a description of the experiences with the various types of interactions between the users and design team. This is accomplished with a report from system usage and implications these design methods had on system design.
Konrad Klöckner, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Wolfgang Prinz
Behav. Inf. Technol.2
1998 Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use
abstract
ti this paper, we present experiences from long-term groupware developmen~introduction and use in an organization.We report lessons learned concerning how a complex design process operates and how its components interac~Our experiences suggest that the processes of requirement analysis, system developmen~and user support need to fac~tate the mer=tig of individud work patterns into congruent system usage.We confirm tbe chm=tig nature of groupwae use by reporting empirical restits descnbmg different learning phases.Ke~ords Cooperative desi~gn,user advocacy, groupware requirements, group work, system inwoduction, prototyping.This paper begins with a description showing how coordination with groupware use is related to the process of group developmen~We then outiine our particular design approach explaining how we tried to achieve a common understanding between tie design team and users, and how we tried to account for user group developmen~ h the foUowing section we present empirical results on the actual use of the system in the work setting, illustrating how tbe group stived to achieve congruent conventions.*POL~e~is funded by
Wolfgang Prinz, Gloria Mark, Uta Pankoke-Babatz
CSCW3
1998 User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers? Experiences with a New Communication Channel
Peter Mambrey, Gloria Mark, Uta Pankoke-Babatz
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.3
1997 Collaborative workspace for time deferred electronic cooperation
abstract
This paper proposes collaborative workspaces as an electronic environment for time deferred team-like cooperation.The design requirements are derived from an investigation of work practices employing simple collaborative workspaces in ministerial units.In addition to facilities for sharing of material among a dedicated group, a collaborative workspace needs to provide appropriate behavior and awareness information to support cooperation.A concept for the technical realization proposes CSCW enablers to allow flexible adaptation of collaborative workspaces to different purposes and to changing user needs.
Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Anja Syri
GROUP1
1995 Supporting Cooperative Awareness with Local Event Mechanisms: The GroupDesk System
Ludwin Fuchs, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Wolfgang Prinz
ECSCW2
1995 POLITeam: Bridging the Gap between Bonn and Berlin for and with the Users
Konrad Klöckner, Peter Mambrey, Markus Sohlenkamp, Wolfgang Prinz, Ludwin Fuchs, Sabine Kolvenbach, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Anja Syri
ECSCW7
1990 1984/1988 X.400 recommendations - user requirements
Uta Pankoke-Babatz
Comput. Commun.1
1986 The AMIGO Project: advanced group communication model for computer-based communications environment
abstract
S.115-142
Thore Danielsen, Uta Pankoke-Babatz, Wolfgang Prinz, Ahmed Patel, Paul-André Pays, Knut Smaaland, Rolf Speth
CSCW2