Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Val King

dblp:84/2454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 50% Design research and methods · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.011994
Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design · CSCW 1994
Design research and methods › field study
design ethnography
0.011994
Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design · CSCW 1994
Requirements engineering and software design
software design methodology
0.011994
Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design · CSCW 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ethnography · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design
abstract
Ethnography has gained considerable prominence as a technique for informing CSCW systems development of the nature of work. Experiences of ethnography reported to date have focused on the use of prolonged on-going enthnography to inform systems design. A considerable number of these studies have taken place within constrained and focused work domain. This paper reflects more generally on the experiences of using ethnography across a number of different projects and in a variety of domains of study. We identify a number of ways in which we have used ethnography to inform design and consider the benefits and problems of each.
John A. Hughes, Val King, Tom Rodden, Hans Andersen
CSCW2