VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Farheen Omar
dblp:85/10620
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 87% Information retrieval · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › content recommendation
document recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding User Behavior For Document Recommendation · WWW 2020 |
Recommender systems
explainable recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding User Behavior For Document Recommendation · WWW 2020 |
Usability and user experience research
user behavior analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding User Behavior For Document Recommendation · WWW 2020 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding User Behavior For Document Recommendation · WWW 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online experiment · 0.9log analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Understanding User Behavior For Document RecommendationabstractPersonalized document recommendation systems aim to provide users with a quick shortcut to the documents they may want to access next, usually with an explanation about why the document is recommended. Previous work explored various methods for better recommendations and better explanations in different domains. However, there are few efforts that closely study how users react to the recommended items in a document recommendation scenario. We conducted a large-scale log study of users’ interaction behavior with the explainable recommendation on one of the largest cloud document platforms office.com. Our analysis reveals a number of factors, including display position, file type, authorship, recency of last access, and most importantly, the recommendation explanations, that are associated with whether users will recognize or open the recommended documents. Moreover, we specifically focus on explanations and conduct an online experiment to investigate the influence of different explanations on user behavior. Our analysis indicates that the recommendations help users access their documents significantly faster, but sometimes users miss a recommendation and resort to other more complicated methods to open the documents. Our results suggest opportunities to improve explanations and more generally the design of systems that provide and explain recommendations for documents. Xuhai Xu, Ahmed Awadallah 0001, Susan T. Dumais, Farheen Omar, Bogdan Popp, Robert Rounthwaite, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh |
WWW | 4 |
| 2010 | Comparative Analysis of Probabilistic Models for Activity Recognition with an Instrumented Walker
Farheen Omar, Mathieu Sinn, Jakub Truszkowski, Pascal Poupart, James Tung, Allen Caine |
UAI | 1 |