Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Jeffrey Peterson

dblp:85/3391 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 64% Interaction techniques and input · 36%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › sketch-based interaction
sketch recognition
0.112010
Grouping Strokes into Shapes in Hand-Drawn Diagrams · AAAI 2010
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.112009
Combining Speech and Sketch to Interpret Unconstrained Descriptions of Mechanical Devices · IJCAI 2009
Haptics and multimodal interaction › multimodal interaction
speech and sketch input
0.112009
Combining Speech and Sketch to Interpret Unconstrained Descriptions of Mechanical Devices · IJCAI 2009
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning
0.012009
Combining Speech and Sketch to Interpret Unconstrained Descriptions of Mechanical Devices · IJCAI 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

clustering · 0.1classification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 An efficient, classification-based approach for grouping pen strokes into objects
Thomas F. Stahovich, Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Hanlung Lin
Comput. Graph.2
2010 Grouping Strokes into Shapes in Hand-Drawn Diagrams
abstract
Objects in freely-drawn sketches often have no spatial or temporal separation, making object recognition difficult. We present a two-step stroke-grouping algorithm that first classifies individual strokes according to the type of object to which they belong, then groups strokes with like classifications into clusters representing individual objects. The first step facilitates clustering by naturally separating the strokes, and both steps fluidly integrate spatial and temporal information. Our approach to grouping is unique in its formulation as an efficient classification task rather than, for example, an expensive search task. Our single-stroke classifier performs at least as well as existing single-stroke classifiers on text vs. nontext classification, and we present the first three-way single-stroke classification results. Our stroke grouping results are the first reported of their kind; our grouping algorithm correctly groups between 86% and 91% of the ink in diagrams from two domains, with between 69% and 79% of shapes being perfectly clustered.
Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Thomas F. Stahovich, Eric Doi, Christine Alvarado
AAAI1
2010 The effect of task on classification accuracy: Using gesture recognition techniques in free-sketch recognition
Martin Field, Sam Gordon, Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Raquel Robinson, Thomas F. Stahovich, Christine Alvarado
Comput. Graph.3
2009 Combining Speech and Sketch to Interpret Unconstrained Descriptions of Mechanical Devices
David Tyler Bischel, Thomas F. Stahovich, Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Randall Davis, Aaron Adler
IJCAI3
2008 Newton's Pen: A pen-based tutoring system for statics
WeeSan Lee, Ruwanee de Silva, Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Robert C. Calfee, Thomas F. Stahovich
Comput. Graph.3