Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vamshi Ambati

dblp:85/4943 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Machine translation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing
0.112012
Collaborative workflow for crowdsourcing translation · CSCW 2012
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
crowdsourced translation
0.012012
Collaborative workflow for crowdsourcing translation · CSCW 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pipeline workflow · 0.3evaluation · 0.3crowdsourcing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Collaborative workflow for crowdsourcing translation
abstract
In this paper we explore the challenges in crowdsourcing the task of translation over the web in which remotely located translators work on providing translations independent of each other. We then propose a collaborative workflow for crowdsourcing translation to address some of these challenges. In our pipeline model, the translators are working in phases where output from earlier phases can be enhanced in the subsequent phases. We also highlight some of the novel contributions of the pipeline model like assistive translation and translation synthesis that can leverage monolingual and bilingual speakers alike. We evaluate our approach by eliciting translations for both a minority-to-majority language pair and a minority-to-minority language pair. We observe that in both scenarios, our workflow produces better quality translations in a cost-effective manner, when compared to the traditional crowdsourcing workflow.
Vamshi Ambati, Stephan Vogel, Jaime G. Carbonell
CSCW1
2011 Multi-Strategy Approaches to Active Learning for Statistical Machine Translation
Vamshi Ambati, Stephan Vogel, Jaime G. Carbonell
MTSummit1
2010 Active Learning and Crowd-Sourcing for Machine Translation
Vamshi Ambati, Stephan Vogel, Jaime G. Carbonell
LREC1
2008 Statistical Machine Translation Models for Personalized Search
U. Rohini, Vamshi Ambati, Vasudeva Varma
IJCNLP2
2008 Linguistic Structure and Bilingual Informants Help Induce Machine Translation of Lesser-Resourced Languages
Christian Monson, Ariadna Font Llitjós, Vamshi Ambati, Lori S. Levin, Alon Lavie, Alison Alvarez, Roberto Aranovich, Jaime G. Carbonell, Robert E. Frederking, Erik Peterson, Katharina Probst
LREC3
2006 Digitizing a Million Books: Challenges for Document Analysis
K. Pramod Sankar, Vamshi Ambati, Lakshmi Pratha, C. V. Jawahar
Document Analysis Systems2