Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sigalit Ur

dblp:89/3096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4Computer networks · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 46% Web and social media mining · 30% Recommender systems · 23%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › social media
enterprise social media
0.222012
Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise · CHI 2012
Do you want to know?: recommending strangers in the enterprise · CSCW 2011
Information retrieval › search engines
expert finding
0.212013
Mining expertise and interests from social media · WWW 2013
Web and social media mining › scholarly data mining
expertise mining
0.212013
Mining expertise and interests from social media · WWW 2013
Recommender systems
user recommendation
0.112011
Do you want to know?: recommending strangers in the enterprise · CSCW 2011
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.112006
The chasms of CSCW: a citation graph analysis of the CSCW conference · CSCW 2006
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
enterprise search
0.012012
Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise · CHI 2012
Information retrieval
search engines
0.012012
Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise · CHI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
data filtering
0.011995
Deriving Multi-Agent Coordination through Filtering Strategies · IJCAI (1) 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent coordination
0.011995
Deriving Multi-Agent Coordination through Filtering Strategies · IJCAI (1) 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

query log analysis · 0.3user study · 0.2qualitative and quantitative analysis · 0.2user survey · 0.2structural analysis · 0.1citation graph analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Mining expertise and interests from social media
abstract
The rising popularity of social media in the enterprise presents new opportunities for one of the organization's most important needs--expertise location. Social media data can be very useful for expertise mining due to the variety of existing applications, the rich metadata, and the diversity of user associations with content. In this work, we provide an extensive study that explores the use of social media to infer expertise within a large global organization. We examine eight different social media applications by evaluating the data they produce through a large user survey, with 670 enterprise social media users. We distinguish between two semantics that relate a user to a topic: expertise in the topic and interest in it and compare these two semantics across the different social media applications.
Ido Guy, Uri Avraham, David Carmel, Sigalit Ur, Michal Jacovi, Inbal Ronen
WWW4
2012 Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise
abstract
This paper presents Faces, an application built to enable effective people search in the enterprise. We take advantage of the popularity Faces has gained within a globally distributed enterprise to provide an extensive analysis of how and why people search is used within the organization. Our study is primarily based on an analysis of the Faces query log over a period of more than four months, with over a million queries and tens of thousands of users. The analysis results are presented across four dimensions: queries, users, clicks, and actions, and lay the foundation for further advancement and research on the topic.
Ido Guy, Sigalit Ur, Inbal Ronen, Sara Weber, Tolga Oral
CHI2
2011 Do you want to know?: recommending strangers in the enterprise
abstract
Recent studies on people recommendation have focused on suggesting people the user already knows. In this work, we use social media behavioral data to recommend people the user is not likely to know, but nonetheless may be interested in. Our evaluation is based on an extensive user study with 516 participants within a large enterprise and includes both quantitative and qualitative results. We found that many employees valued the recommendations, even if only one or two of nine recommendations were interesting strangers. Based on these results, we discuss potential deployment routes and design implications for a stranger recommendation feature.
Ido Guy, Sigalit Ur, Inbal Ronen, Adam Perer, Michal Jacovi
CSCW2
2009 Social networks and discovery in the enterprise (SaND)
abstract
No abstract available.
Inbal Ronen, Elad Shahar, Sigalit Ur, Erel Uziel, Sivan Yogev, Naama Zwerdling, David Carmel, Ido Guy, Nadav Har'El, Shila Ofek-Koifman
SIGIR3
2006 The chasms of CSCW: a citation graph analysis of the CSCW conference
abstract
The CSCW conference is celebrating its 20th birthday. This is a perfect time to analyze the coherence of the field, to examine whether it has a solid core or sub-communities, and to identify various patterns of its development. In this paper we analyze the structure of the CSCW conference using structural analysis of the citation graph of CSCW and related publications. We identify the conference's core and most prominent clusters. We also define a measure to identify chasm-papers, namely papers cited significantly more outside the conference than within, and analyze such papers.
Michal Jacovi, Vladimir Soroka, Gail Gilboa-Freedman, Sigalit Ur, Elad Shahar, Natalia Marmasse
CSCW4
2003 Why do we ReachOut?: functions of a semi-persistent peer support tool
abstract
Collaboration plays a vital role in today's new business environment. Knowledge that resides within people's heads has become an invaluable resource. Many formal tools, such as e-mail or teamrooms, have been introduced to support formal collaboration and have been studied extensively. However, support for informal communication is still in its infancy. Much work has been done to analyze the functions that informal communication plays in the workplace. Recently, several studies have evaluated the roles that instant messaging (IM) plays in similar settings. Research shows that in the workplace, IM is used primarily for work-related purposes and accelerates the completion of important business tasks. Clearly, new tools that combine both formal and informal interaction can bring organizations tremendous rewards. ReachOut is a tool for semi-persistent collaboration and peer support developed by the Collaboration Technologies Group at the IBM Haifa Research Lab. This paper studies the role ReachOut plays in the workplace. We analyzed the collaboration activity of the community of IBM Haifa Labs employees who used ReachOut for a period of two months. As a result, we summarize the important functions played by tools that bridge between formal and informal communication in a workplace-based community.
Michal Jacovi, Vladimir Soroka, Sigalit Ur
GROUP3
1998 The Shark-Search Algorithm. An Application: Tailored Web Site Mapping
Michael Herscovici, Michal Jacovi, Yoelle Maarek, Dan Pelleg, Menachem Shtalhaim, Sigalit Ur
Comput. Networks6
1997 WebCutter: A System for Dynamic and Tailorable Site Mapping
Yoelle Maarek, Michal Jacovi, Menachem Shtalhaim, Sigalit Ur, Dror Zernik, Israel Ben-Shaul
Comput. Networks4
1995 Deriving Multi-Agent Coordination through Filtering Strategies
Eithan Ephrati, Martha E. Pollack, Sigalit Ur
IJCAI (1)3