Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iris Sprow
dblp:94/8115
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Computational photography and imaging · 50% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging › color science › color management
gamut mapping evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
perceptual evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
subjective evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
psycho-visual testing · 0.2multi-attribute preference assessment · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping AlgorithmsabstractWe show that conjoint analysis, a popular multi-attribute preference assessment technique used in market research, is a well suited tool to evaluate a multitude of gamut mapping algorithms simultaneously. Our analysis is based on data from psycho-visual tests assessed in a laboratory and in a web environment. Conjoint analysis allows us to quantify the contribution of every single parameter value to the perceived value of the algorithm; it also allows us to test the influence of additional parameters like gamut size or color shifts. We show that conjoint analysis can be individualized to images or observers if enough data is available. Especially promising in this respect is the combination of individual and population data. Peter Zolliker, Zofia Baranczuk, Iris Sprow, Joachim Giesen |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 3 |