Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Iris Sprow

dblp:94/8115 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Computational photography and imaging · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging › color science › color management
gamut mapping evaluation
0.112010
Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
perceptual evaluation
0.112010
Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
subjective evaluation
0.112010
Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

psycho-visual testing · 0.2multi-attribute preference assessment · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Conjoint Analysis for Evaluating Parameterized Gamut Mapping Algorithms
abstract
We show that conjoint analysis, a popular multi-attribute preference assessment technique used in market research, is a well suited tool to evaluate a multitude of gamut mapping algorithms simultaneously. Our analysis is based on data from psycho-visual tests assessed in a laboratory and in a web environment. Conjoint analysis allows us to quantify the contribution of every single parameter value to the perceived value of the algorithm; it also allows us to test the influence of additional parameters like gamut size or color shifts. We show that conjoint analysis can be individualized to images or observers if enough data is available. Especially promising in this respect is the combination of individual and population data.
Peter Zolliker, Zofia Baranczuk, Iris Sprow, Joachim Giesen
IEEE Trans. Image Process.3