Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Freed

dblp:95/5209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-5570-9488ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 63% Interaction techniques and input · 19% Usability and user experience research · 9%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 80% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 13% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.212016
A Virtual Assistant to Help Dysphagia Patients Eat Safely at Home · IJCAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › conversational agents
conversational assistant
0.222008
RADAR: A Personal Assistant that Learns to Reduce Email Overload · AAAI 2008
A Demonstration of the RADAR Personal Assistant · AAAI 2008
Usability and user experience research › human performance modeling
predictive human performance modeling
0.012002
Automating CPM-GOMS · CHI 2002
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan execution
0.011997
Managing Decision Resources in Plan Execution · IJCAI (1) 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan debugging
0.011991
Plan Debugging in an Intentional System · IJCAI 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › diagnosis
model-based diagnosis
0.011990
Model-Based Diagnosis of Planning Failures · AAAI 1990
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
resource allocation
0.011997
Managing Decision Resources in Plan Execution · IJCAI (1) 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resource scheduling · 0.0PERT charts · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A Virtual Assistant to Help Dysphagia Patients Eat Safely at Home
Michael Freed, Brian Burns, Aaron Heller, Daniel Sánchez 0006, Sharon Beaumont-Bowman
IJCAI1
2008 A Demonstration of the RADAR Personal Assistant
Andrew Faulring, Brad A. Myers, Ken Mohnkern, Michael Freed
AAAI4
2008 RADAR: A Personal Assistant that Learns to Reduce Email Overload
Michael Freed, Jaime G. Carbonell, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Jordan Hayes, Brad A. Myers, Daniel P. Siewiorek, Stephen F. Smith, Aaron Steinfeld, Anthony Tomasic
AAAI1
2008 Using Semantic Features to Improve Task Identification in Email Messages
Shinjae Yoo, Donna Gates, Lori S. Levin, Simon Fung, Sachin Agarwal 0002, Michael Freed
NLDB6
2005 Automating Human-Performance Modeling at the Millisecond Level
abstract
A priori prediction of skilled human performance has the potential to be of great practical value but is difficult to carry out. This article reports on an approach that facilitates modeling of human behavior at the level of cognitive, perceptual, and motor operations, following the CPM-GOMS method (John, 1990). CPM-GOMS is a powerful modeling method that has remained underused because of the expertise and labor required. We describe a process for automatically generating CPM-GOMS models from a hierarchical task decomposition expressed in a computational modeling tool, taking advantage of reusable behavior templates and their efficacy for generating zero-parameter a priori predictions of complex human behavior. To demonstrate the process, we present a model of automated teller machine interaction. The model shows that it is possible to string together existing behavioral templates that compose basic HCI tasks, (e.g., mousing to a button and clicking on it) to generate powerful human performance predictions. Because interleaving of templates is now automated, it becomes possible to construct arbitrarily long sequences of behavior. In addition, the manipulation and adaptation of complete models has the potential of becoming dramatically easier. Thus, the tool described here provides an engine for CPM-GOMS that may facilitate computational modeling of human performance at the millisecond level.
Alonso H. Vera, Bonnie E. John, Roger W. Remington, Michael Matessa, Michael Freed
Hum. Comput. Interact.5
2002 Automating CPM-GOMS
abstract
CPM-GOMS is a modeling method that combines the task decomposition of a GOMS analysis with a model of human resource usage at the level of cognitive, perceptual, and motor operations. CPM-GOMS models have made accurate predictions about skilled user behavior in routine tasks, but developing such models is tedious and error-prone. We describe a process for automatically generating CPM-GOMS models from a hierarchical task decomposition expressed in a cognitive modeling tool called Apex. Resource scheduling in Apex automates the difficult task of interleaving the cognitive, perceptual, and motor resources underlying common task operators (e.g. mouse move-and-click). Apex’s UI automatically generates PERT charts, which allow modelers to visualize a model’s complex parallel behavior. Because interleaving and visualization is now automated, it is feasible to construct arbitrarily long sequences of behavior. To demonstrate the process, we present a model of automated teller interactions in Apex and discuss implications for user modeling.
Bonnie E. John, Alonso H. Vera, Michael Matessa, Michael Freed, Roger W. Remington
CHI4
1997 Managing Decision Resources in Plan Execution
Michael Freed, Roger W. Remington
IJCAI (1)1
1991 Plan Debugging in an Intentional System
Gregg Collins, Lawrence Birnbaum, Bruce Krulwich, Michael Freed
IJCAI4
1990 Model-Based Diagnosis of Planning Failures
Lawrence Birnbaum, Gregg Collins, Michael Freed, Bruce Krulwich
AAAI3