Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Juliette Link

dblp:95/9545 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 44% User interface design and tools · 44% Human-AI interaction · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › text entry
keyboard interaction
0.112011
Parameter selection in keyboard-based dialog boxes · CHI 2011
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction › language-based interaction
command line interfaces
0.012011
Parameter selection in keyboard-based dialog boxes · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

laboratory study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 It's alive!: exploring the design space of a gesturing phone
Jessica Q. Dawson, Oliver Schneider 0006, Joel Ferstay, Dereck Toker, Juliette Link, Shathel Haddad, Karon E. MacLean
Graphics Interface5
2011 Parameter selection in keyboard-based dialog boxes
abstract
Recent keyboard-based alternatives to WIMP interfaces do not have good support for commands that require multiple parameters. We remedy this by extending a previous design and mimicking dialog boxes to provide good visual feedback while still keeping the advantages of keyboard input. A laboratory study showed the new technique to be competitive with dialog boxes on speed and error rate, but strongly preferred over dialog boxes by experienced command line users. This is a marked improvement over the previous design, which was also preferred by the target user group but did not compete with dialog boxes in terms of performance.
Jeff C. Hendy, Juliette Link, Kellogg S. Booth, Joanna McGrenere
CHI2