Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven P. Abney

dblp:98/5756 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 64% Graph learning · 19% Language models and text generation · 17%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual corpus
0.112010
The Human Language Project: Building a Universal Corpus of the World's Languages · ACL 2010
Machine learning › Graph learning › limited supervision › multi-view semi-supervised learning
co-training
0.012002
Bootstrapping · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
low-resource languages
0.012010
The Human Language Project: Building a Universal Corpus of the World's Languages · ACL 2010
Automata and formal languages
probabilistic grammars
0.011999
Relating Probabilistic Grammars and Automata · ACL 1999
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
bootstrapping
0.012002
Bootstrapping · ACL 2002
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
informal communication
0.011992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992
Automata and formal languages › pushdown automata
probabilistic pushdown automata
0.011999
Relating Probabilistic Grammars and Automata · ACL 1999
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.011992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
online discussion
0.011992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

yarowsky algorithm · 0.0co-training · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Anders Søgaard: Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptation in Natural Language Processing - Morgan & Claypool, 2013, ISBN 9781608459858, x + 93 pp
Steven P. Abney
Mach. Transl.1
2013 Labeling the Languages of Words in Mixed-Language Documents using Weakly Supervised Methods
Ben King, Steven P. Abney
HLT-NAACL2
2010 The Human Language Project: Building a Universal Corpus of the World's Languages
Steven P. Abney, Steven Bird
ACL1
2007 Aspect marker generation in English-to-Chinese machine translation
Karl-Michael Schneider, Steven P. Abney
MTSummit3
2005 Automatically Inducing a Part-of-Speech Tagger by Projecting from Multiple Source Languages Across Aligned Corpora
Victoria Fossum, Steven P. Abney
IJCNLP2
2004 Understanding the Yarowsky Algorithm
abstract
Many problems in computational linguistics are well suited for bootstrapping (semisupervised learning) techniques. The Yarowsky algorithm is a well-known bootstrapping algorithm, but it is not mathematically well understood. This article analyzes it as optimizing an objective function. More specifically, a number of variants of the Yarowsky algorithm (though not the original algorithm itself) are shown to optimize either likelihood or a closely related objective function K.
Steven P. Abney
Comput. Linguistics1
2002 Bootstrapping
abstract
This paper refines the analysis of co-training, defines and evaluates a new co-training algorithm that has theoretical justification, gives a theoretical justification for the Yarowsky algorithm, and shows that co-training and the Yarowsky algorithm are based on different independence assumptions.
Steven P. Abney
ACL1
2000 Improving intonational phrasing with syntactic information
abstract
The prediction of intonational phrase boundaries from raw text is an important step for a text-to-speech system: locating where to place short pauses enables more natural sounding speech, that can be more easily understood. We improved upon earlier work [Hirschberg and Prieto, 1996] by adding syntactic information gained from a high-accuracy parser [Collins, 1999]. We report significant improvement using various experimental setups. We also show that our improved method comes close to interannotator agreement.
Philipp Koehn, Steven P. Abney, Julia Hirschberg, Michael Collins 0001
ICASSP2
1999 Relating Probabilistic Grammars and Automata
abstract
Both probabilistic context-free grammars (PCFGs) and shift-reduce probabilistic pushdown automata (PPDAs) have been used for language modeling and maximum likelihood parsing. We investigate the precise relationship between these two formalisms, showing that, while they define the same classes of probabilistic languages, they appear to impose different inductive biases.
Steven P. Abney, David A. McAllester, Fernando Pereira 0003
ACL1
1997 Stochastic Attribute-Value Grammars
Steven P. Abney
Comput. Linguistics1
1996 Partial parsing via finite-state cascades
abstract
Finite state cascades represent an attractive architecture for parsing unrestricted text. Deterministic parsers specified by finite state cascades are fast and reliable. They can be extended at modest cost to construct parse trees with finite feature structures. Finally, such deterministic parsers do not necessarily involve trading off accuracy against speed — they may in fact be more accurate than exhaustive search stochastic context free parsers.
Steven P. Abney
Nat. Lang. Eng.1
1992 Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups
abstract
In this paper, we introduce ephemeral interest groups for supporting informal communication. Ephemeral interest groups are electronic discussion groups that, in contrast to bulletin boards and the like, are short-lived and ad hoc. They are designed as a medium for informal discussions of items broadcast to a wider community. We have implemented a prototype system to explore ephemeral interest groups. We discuss the goals of the system, characterize its evolution over the last ten months of deployment, and sketch our plans for future developments.
Laurence Brothers, James D. Hollan, Jakob Neilsen, Scott Stornetta, Steven P. Abney, George W. Furnas, Michael L. Littman
CSCW5