Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Stephen E. Fienberg

dblp:f/StephenEFienberg · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
23ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-6753-6016ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 9 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 8Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 57% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 43%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 100%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 23%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.522016
Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principle · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlo · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
learnability
0.212016
Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principle · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › learnability
private learnability
0.212016
Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principle · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning
0.212016
Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principle · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.212015
Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlo · ICML 2015
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
stochastic block model
0.222008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · NIPS 2008
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.112010
Discriminative topic modeling based on manifold learning · KDD 2010
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
discriminative topic modeling
0.112010
Discriminative topic modeling based on manifold learning · KDD 2010
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.112010
Discriminative topic modeling based on manifold learning · KDD 2010
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.112010
Discriminative topic modeling based on manifold learning · KDD 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixed membership models
0.112008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · NIPS 2008
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection › stochastic block model
mixed membership stochastic blockmodel
0.112008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Data mining
network analysis
0.112008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Wearable and physiological sensing › cognitive state monitoring
stress detection
0.112016
Test time feature ordering with FOCUS: interactive predictions with minimal user burden · UbiComp 2016
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis
0.012008
Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels · NIPS 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vapnik learning theory · 0.5stability analysis · 0.5stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.4markov chain monte carlo · 0.4variational inference · 0.3supervised machine learning · 0.2cost-sensitive feature selection · 0.2latent variable model · 0.2bayesian modeling · 0.2pareto improvement · 0.1generalized EM · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Test time feature ordering with FOCUS: interactive predictions with minimal user burden
abstract
Predictive algorithms are a critical part of the ubiquitous computing vision, enabling appropriate action on behalf of users. A common class of algorithms, which has seen uptake in ubiquitous computing, is supervised machine learning algorithms. Such algorithms are trained to make predictions based on a set of features (selected at training time). However, features needed at prediction time (such as mobile information that impacts battery life, or information collected from users via experience sampling) may be costly to collect. In addition, both cost and value of a feature may change dynamically based on real-world context (such as battery life or user location) and prediction context (what features are already known, and what their values are). We contribute a framework for dynamically trading off feature cost against prediction quality at prediction time. We demonstrate this work in the context of three prediction tasks: providing prospective tenants estimates for energy costs in potential homes, estimating momentary stress levels from both sensed and user-provided mobile data, and classifying images to facilitate opportunistic device interactions. Our results show that while our approach to cost-sensitive feature selection is up to 45% less costly than competing approaches, error rates are equivalent or better.
Kirstin Early, Stephen E. Fienberg, Jennifer Mankoff
UbiComp2
2016 On-Average KL-Privacy and Its Equivalence to Generalization for Max-Entropy Mechanisms
Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Jing Lei 0003, Stephen E. Fienberg
PSD3
2016 Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principle
abstract
While machine learning has proven to be a powerful data-driven solution to many real-life problems, its use in sensitive domains has been limited due to privacy concerns. A popular approach known as differential privacy offers provable privacy guarantees, but it is often observed in practice that it could substantially hamper learning accuracy. In this paper we study the learnability (whether a problem can be learned by any algorithm) under Vapnik's general learning setting with differential privacy constraint, and reveal some intricate relationships between privacy, stability and learnability. In particular, we show that a problem is privately learnable if an only if there is a private algorithm that asymptotically minimizes the empirical risk (AERM). In contrast, for non- private learning AERM alone is not sufficient for learnability. This result suggests that when searching for private learning algorithms, we can restrict the search to algorithms that are AERM. In light of this, we propose a conceptual procedure that always finds a universally consistent algorithm whenever the problem is learnable under privacy constraint. We also propose a generic and practical algorithm and show that under very general conditions it privately learns a wide class of learning problems. Lastly, we extend some of the results to the more practical $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy and establish the existence of a phase-transition on the class of problems that are approximately privately learnable with respect to how small $\delta$ needs to be.
Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Jing Lei 0003, Stephen E. Fienberg
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2015 Privacy for Free: Posterior Sampling and Stochastic Gradient Monte Carlo
abstract
We consider the problem of Bayesian learning on sensitive datasets and present two simple but somewhat surprising results that connect Bayesian learning to “differential privacy”, a cryptographic approach to protect individual-level privacy while permitting database-level utility. Specifically, we show that under standard assumptions, getting one sample from a posterior distribution is differentially private “for free”; and this sample as a statistical estimator is often consistent, near optimal, and computationally tractable. Similarly but separately, we show that a recent line of work that use stochastic gradient for Hybrid Monte Carlo (HMC) sampling also preserve differentially privacy with minor or no modifications of the algorithmic procedure at all, these observations lead to an “anytime” algorithm for Bayesian learning under privacy constraint. We demonstrate that it performs much better than the state-of-the-art differential private methods on synthetic and real datasets.
Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Stephen E. Fienberg, Alexander J. Smola
ICML2
2014 SMERED: A Bayesian Approach to Graphical Record Linkage and De-duplication
abstract
We propose a novel unsupervised approach for linking records across arbitrarily many files, while simultaneously detecting duplicate records within files. Our key innovation is to represent the pattern of links between records as a bipartite graph, in which records are directly linked to latent true individuals, and only indirectly linked to other records. This flexible new representation of the linkage structure naturally allows us to estimate the attributes of the unique observable people in the population, calculate k-way posterior probabilities of matches across records, and propagate the uncertainty of record linkage into later analyses. Our linkage structure lends itself to an efficient, linear-time, hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, which overcomes many obstacles encountered by previously proposed methods of record linkage, despite the high dimensional parameter space. We assess our results on real and simulated data.
Rebecca C. Steorts, Rob Hall 0001, Stephen E. Fienberg
AISTATS3
2014 A Comparison of Blocking Methods for Record Linkage
Rebecca C. Steorts, Samuel L. Ventura, Mauricio Sadinle, Stephen E. Fienberg
Privacy in Statistical Databases4
2014 Differentially-Private Logistic Regression for Detecting Multiple-SNP Association in GWAS Databases
Fei Yu 0005, Michal Rybár, Caroline Uhler, Stephen E. Fienberg
Privacy in Statistical Databases4
2014 Scalable privacy-preserving data sharing methodology for genome-wide association studies
Fei Yu 0005, Stephen E. Fienberg, Aleksandra B. Slavkovic, Caroline Uhler
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2013 Anonymous Authentication of Visitors for Mobile Crowd Sensing at Amusement Parks
Divyan M. Konidala, Robert H. Deng, Yingjiu Li, Hoong Chuin Lau, Stephen E. Fienberg
ISPEC5
2012 Valid Statistical Inference on Automatically Matched Files
Rob Hall 0001, Stephen E. Fienberg
Privacy in Statistical Databases2
2012 Discriminative Topic Modeling Based on Manifold Learning
abstract
Topic modeling has become a popular method used for data analysis in various domains including text documents. Previous topic model approaches, such as probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), have shown impressive success in discovering low-rank hidden structures for modeling text documents. These approaches, however do not take into account the manifold structure of the data, which is generally informative for nonlinear dimensionality reduction mapping. More recent topic model approaches, Laplacian PLSI (LapPLSI) and Locally-consistent Topic Model (LTM), have incorporated the local manifold structure into topic models and have shown resulting benefits. But they fall short of achieving full discriminating power of manifold learning as they only enhance the proximity between the low-rank representations of neighboring pairs without any consideration for non-neighboring pairs. In this article, we propose a new approach, Discriminative Topic Model (DTM), which separates non-neighboring pairs from each other in addition to bringing neighboring pairs closer together, thereby preserving the global manifold structure as well as improving local consistency. We also present a novel model-fitting algorithm based on the generalized EM algorithm and the concept of Pareto improvement. We empirically demonstrate the success of DTM in terms of unsupervised clustering and semisupervised classification accuracies on text corpora and robustness to parameters compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Seungil Huh, Stephen E. Fienberg
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data2
2010 User Interest and Interaction Structure in Online Forums
Daniel Percival, Stephen E. Fienberg
ICWSM3
2010 Discriminative topic modeling based on manifold learning
abstract
Topic modeling has been popularly used for data analysis in various domains including text documents. Previous topic models, such as probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), have shown impressive success in discovering low-rank hidden structures for modeling text documents. These models, however, do not take into account the manifold structure of data, which is generally informative for the non-linear dimensionality reduction mapping. More recent models, namely Laplacian PLSI (LapPLSI) and Locally-consistent Topic Model (LTM), have incorporated the local manifold structure into topic models and have shown the resulting benefits. But these approaches fall short of the full discriminating power of manifold learning as they only enhance the proximity between the low-rank representations of neighboring pairs without any consideration for non-neighboring pairs. In this paper, we propose Discriminative Topic Model (DTM) that separates non-neighboring pairs from each other in addition to bringing neighboring pairs closer together, thereby preserving the global manifold structure as well as improving the local consistency. We also present a novel model fitting algorithm based on the generalized EM and the concept of Pareto improvement. As a result, DTM achieves higher classification performance in a semi-supervised setting by effectively exposing the manifold structure of data. We provide empirical evidence on text corpora to demonstrate the success of DTM in terms of classification accuracy and robustness to parameters compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Seungil Huh, Stephen E. Fienberg
KDD2
2010 Differential Privacy and the Risk-Utility Tradeoff for Multi-dimensional Contingency Tables
Stephen E. Fienberg, Alessandro Rinaldo
Privacy in Statistical Databases1
2010 Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
Rob Hall 0001, Stephen E. Fienberg
Privacy in Statistical Databases2
2008 Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels
abstract
Observations consisting of measurements on relationships for pairs of objects arise in many settings, such as protein interaction and gene regulatory networks, collections of author-recipient email, and social networks. Analyzing such data with probabilisic models can be delicate because the simple exchangeability assumptions underlying many boilerplate models no longer hold. In this paper, we describe a class of latent variable models of such data called Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels. This model extends blockmodels for relational data to ones which capture mixed membership latent relational structure, thus providing an object-specific low-dimensional representation. We develop a general variational inference algorithm for fast approximate posterior inference. We explore applications to social networks and protein interaction networks.
Edoardo M. Airoldi, David M. Blei, Stephen E. Fienberg, Eric P. Xing
NIPS3
2008 Random orthogonal matrix masking methodology for microdata release
abstract
Statistically defensible methods for disclosure limitation allow users to make inferences about parameters in a model similar to those that would be possible using the original unreleased data. We present a new perturbation method for protecting confidential continuous microdata ? Random Orthogonal Matrix Masking (ROMM) which preserves the sufficient statistics for multivariate normal distributions, and thus is statistically defensible. ROMM encompasses all methods that preserve these statistics and can be restricted to provide 'small' perturbations. We contrast ROMM with other microdata perturbation methods and we discuss methods for evaluating it from the perspective of the tradeoff between disclosure risk and data utility.
Daniel Ting, Stephen E. Fienberg, Mario Trottini
Int. J. Inf. Comput. Secur.2
2008 Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels
Edoardo M. Airoldi, David M. Blei, Stephen E. Fienberg, Eric P. Xing
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2006 "Secure" Log-Linear and Logistic Regression Analysis of Distributed Databases
Stephen E. Fienberg, William J. Fulp, Aleksandra B. Slavkovic, Tracey A. Wrobel
Privacy in Statistical Databases1
2006 Polyhedral conditions for the nonexistence of the MLE for hierarchical log-linear models
Nicholas Eriksson, Stephen E. Fienberg, Alessandro Rinaldo, Seth Sullivant
J. Symb. Comput.2
2005 Preserving the Confidentiality of Categorical Statistical Data Bases When Releasing Information for Association Rules
Stephen E. Fienberg, Aleksandra B. Slavkovic
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.1
2002 Software Systems for Tabular Data Releases
abstract
We describe two classes of software systems that release tabular summaries of an underlying database. Table servers respond to user queries for (marginal) sub-tables of the "full" table summarizing the entire database, and are characterized by dynamic assessment of disclosure risk, in light of previously answered queries. Optimal tabular releases are static releases of sets of sub-tables that are characterized by maximizing the amount of information released, as given by a measure of data utility, subject to a constraint on disclosure risk. Underlying abstractions — primarily associated with the query space, as well as released and unreleasable sub-tables and frontiers, computational algorithms and issues, especially scalability, and prototype software implementations are discussed.
Adrian Dobra, Alan F. Karr, Ashish P. Sanil, Stephen E. Fienberg
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst.4
2002 Modelling User Uncertainty for Disclosure Risk and Data Utility
abstract
In this paper we show how a simple model that captures user uncertainty can be used to define suitable measures of disclosure risk and data utility. The model generalizes previous results of Duncan and Lambert.1 We present several examples to illustrate how the new measures can be used to implement existing optimality criteria for the choice of the best form of data release.
Mario Trottini, Stephen E. Fienberg
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst.2