Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Weiming Liu 0001

dblp:00/105-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 90% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Computational complexity · 70% Logic in computer science · 30%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative spatial reasoning
0.742017
On Redundant Topological Constraints (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2017
On Redundant Topological Constraints · KR 2014
Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects: The NP-hardness result · Artif. Intell. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative constraint satisfaction
0.422015
On redundant topological constraints · Artif. Intell. 2015
Qualitative constraint satisfaction problems: An extended framework with landmarks · Artif. Intell. 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning › qualitative spatial reasoning
region connection calculus
0.312017
On Redundant Topological Constraints (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2017
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.312017
On Redundant Topological Constraints (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
topological constraints
0.212014
On Redundant Topological Constraints · KR 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
cardinal direction calculus
0.112011
Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects: The NP-hardness result · Artif. Intell. 2011
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
qualitative spatial reasoning
0.112010
Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects · Artif. Intell. 2010
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112010
Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects · Artif. Intell. 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
RCC-8
0.112009
Combining RCC-8 with Qualitative Direction Calculi: Algorithms and Complexity · IJCAI 2009
Computational complexity
complexity of reasoning
0.112009
Combining RCC-8 with Qualitative Direction Calculi: Algorithms and Complexity · IJCAI 2009
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112008
Reasoning with Cardinal Directions: An Efficient Algorithm · AAAI 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak composition · 0.6path consistency · 0.6complexity analysis · 0.4constraint satisfaction · 0.2constraint reasoning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 On Redundant Topological Constraints (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Redundancy checking is an important task in AI subfields such as knowledge representation and constraint solving. This paper considers redundant topological constraints, defined in the region connection calculus RCC8. We say a constraint in a set C of RCC8 constraints is redundant if it is entailed by the rest of C. A prime subnetwork of C is a subset of C which contains no redundant constraints and has the same solution set as C. It is natural to ask how to compute such a prime subnetwork, and when it is unique. While this problem is in general intractable, we show that, if S is a subalgebra of RCC8 in which weak composition distributes over nonempty intersections, then C has a unique prime subnetwork, which can be obtained in cubic time by removing all redundant constraints simultaneously from C. As a by-product, we show that any path-consistent network over such a distributive subalgebra is minimal.
Sanjiang Li, Zhiguo Long, Weiming Liu 0001, Matt Duckham, Alan Both
IJCAI3
2015 On redundant topological constraints
Sanjiang Li, Zhiguo Long, Weiming Liu 0001, Matt Duckham, Alan Both
Artif. Intell.3
2015 Cardinal directions: a comparison of direction relation matrix and objects interaction matrix
abstract
How to express and reason with cardinal directions between extended objects such as lines and regions is an important problem in qualitative spatial reasoning (QSR), a common subfield of geographical information science and Artificial Intelligence (AI). The direction relation matrix (DRM) model, proposed by Goyal and Egenhofer in 1997, is one very expressive relation model for this purpose. Unlike many other relation models in QSR, the set-theoretic converse of a DRM relation is not necessarily representable in DRM. Schneider et al. regard this as a serious shortcoming and propose, in their work published in ACM TODS (2012), the objects interaction matrix (OIM) model for modelling cardinal directions between complex regions. OIM is also a tiling-based model that consists of two phases: the tiling phase and the interpretation phase. Although it was claimed that OIM is a novel concept, we show that it is not so different from DRM if we represent the cardinal direction of two regions a and b by both the DRM of a to b and that of b to a. Under this natural assumption, we give methods for computing DRMs from OIMs and vice versa, and show that OIM is almost the same as DRM in the tiling phase, and becomes less precise after interpretation. Furthermore, exploiting the similarity between the two models, we prove that the consistency of a complete basic OIM network can be decided in cubic time. This answers an open problem raised by Schneider et al. regarding efficient algorithms for reasoning with OIM.
Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu 0001
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.2
2014 On Redundant Topological Constraints
Matt Duckham, Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu 0001, Zhiguo Long
KR3
2014 Reasoning about Topological and Cardinal Direction Relations Between 2-Dimensional Spatial Objects
abstract
Increasing the expressiveness of qualitative spatial calculi is an essential step towards meeting the requirements of applications. This can be achieved by combining existing calculi in a way that we can express spatial information using relations from multiple calculi. The great challenge is to develop reasoning algorithms that are correct and complete when reasoning over the combined information. Previous work has mainly studied cases where the interaction between the combined calculi was small, or where one of the two calculi was very simple. In this paper we tackle the important combination of topological and directional information for extended spatial objects. We combine some of the best known calculi in qualitative spatial reasoning, the RCC8 algebra for representing topological information, and the Rectangle Algebra (RA) and the Cardinal Direction Calculus (CDC) for directional information. We consider two different interpretations of the RCC8 algebra, one uses a weak connectedness relation, the other uses a strong connectedness relation. In both interpretations, we show that reasoning with topological and directional information is decidable and remains in NP. Our computational complexity results unveil the significant differences between RA and CDC, and that between weak and strong RCC8 models. Take the combination of basic RCC8 and basic CDC constraints as an example: we show that the consistency problem is in P only when we use the strong RCC8 algebra and explicitly know the corresponding basic RA constraints.
Anthony G. Cohn 0001, Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu 0001, Jochen Renz
J. Artif. Intell. Res.3
2013 Qualitative constraint satisfaction problems: An extended framework with landmarks
Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu 0001, Sheng-Sheng Wang 0001
Artif. Intell.2
2012 Solving Minimal Constraint Networks in Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li
CP1
2011 Solving Qualitative Constraints Involving Landmarks
Weiming Liu 0001, Sheng-Sheng Wang 0001, Sanjiang Li, Dayou Liu
CP1
2011 Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects: The NP-hardness result
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li
Artif. Intell.1
2011 On standard models of fuzzy region connection calculus
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2010 Topological Relations between Convex Regions
abstract
Topological relations between spatial objects are the most important kind of qualitative spatial information. Dozens of relation models have been proposed in the past two decades. These models usually make a small number of distinctions and therefore can only cope with spatial information at a fixed granularity of spatial knowledge. In this paper, we propose a topological relation model in which the topological relation between two convex plane regions can be uniquely represented as a circular string over the alphabet {u; v; x; y}. A linear algorithm is given to compute the topological relation between two convex polygons. The infinite relation calculus could be used in hierarchical spatial reasoning as well as in qualitative shape description.
Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu 0001
AAAI2
2010 Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li, Mingsheng Ying
Artif. Intell.1
2009 Combining RCC-8 with Qualitative Direction Calculi: Algorithms and Complexity
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li, Jochen Renz
IJCAI1
2008 Reasoning with Cardinal Directions: An Efficient Algorithm
Weiming Liu 0001, Sanjiang Li, Mingsheng Ying
AAAI2