Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert J. Yan
dblp:00/1173
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics
portfolio construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Machine learning for stock selection · KDD 2007 |
Computational finance and economics › portfolio management
stock selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Machine learning for stock selection · KDD 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototype ranking · 0.1competitive learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Machine learning for stock selectionabstractIn this paper, we propose a new method called Prototype Ranking (PR) designed for the stock selection problem. PR takes into account the huge size of real-world stock data and applies a modified competitive learning technique to predict the ranks of stocks. The primary target of PR is to select the top performing stocks among many ordinary stocks. PR is designed to perform the learning and testing in a noisy stocks sample set where the top performing stocks are usually the minority. The performance of PR is evaluated by a trading simulation of the real stock data. Each week the stocks with the highest predicted ranks are chosen to construct a portfolio. In the period of 1978-2004, PR's portfolio earns a much higher average return as well as a higher risk-adjusted return than Cooper's method, which shows that the PR method leads to a clear profit improvement. Robert J. Yan, Charles Ling 0001 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2003 | Decision Tree with Better Ranking
Charles Ling 0001, Robert J. Yan |
ICML | 2 |