Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan

dblp:00/1939 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
11as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 11 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
17 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 26% Video understanding and tracking · 25% Vision and language · 24%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 65% Machine learning and data management · 35%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 46% Mathematical optimization · 27% Approximation and online algorithms · 27%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 42, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.872014
Large-Scale Live Active Learning: Training Object Detectors with Crawled Data and Crowds · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2014
Cost-Sensitive Active Visual Category Learning · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Large-scale live active learning: Training object detectors with crawled data and crowds · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.722018
AVA: A Video Dataset of Spatio-Temporally Localized Atomic Visual Actions · CVPR 2018
Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localization · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
diverse image captioning
0.712023
IC3: Image Captioning by Committee Consensus · EMNLP 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
image caption evaluation
0.712023
IC3: Image Captioning by Committee Consensus · EMNLP 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.712023
IC3: Image Captioning by Committee Consensus · EMNLP 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.652018
Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine · CVPR 2013
Large-scale live active learning: Training object detectors with crawled data and crowds · CVPR 2011
Efficient region search for object detection · CVPR 2011
Information retrieval › hashing › hashing for nearest neighbor search
locality-sensitive hashing
0.422014
Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection
spatio-temporal action localization
0.312018
AVA: A Video Dataset of Spatio-Temporally Localized Atomic Visual Actions · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection
temporal action localization
0.312018
Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localization · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection › temporal action localization
temporal action proposal generation
0.312018
Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localization · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.212015
Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
long-range temporal modeling
0.212015
Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification · CVPR 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM
0.212015
Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification · CVPR 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.212015
Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video classification
0.212015
Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.222011
Actively selecting annotations among objects and attributes · ICCV 2011
Keywords to visual categories: Multiple-instance learning forweakly supervised object categorization · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.222010
Far-sighted active learning on a budget for image and video recognition · CVPR 2010
What's it going to cost you?: Predicting effort vs. informativeness for multi-label image annotations · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
detector training
0.212014
Large-Scale Live Active Learning: Training Object Detectors with Crawled Data and Crowds · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2014
Machine learning and data management
active learning
0.212014
Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.212014
Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Machine learning and data management › active learning
pool-based active learning
0.212014
Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › part-based object detection
deformable part model
0.212013
Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
large-scale object detection
0.212013
Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine · CVPR 2013
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.212013
Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
label propagation
0.112012
Active Frame Selection for Label Propagation in Videos · ECCV (5) 2012
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
attribute recognition
0.112011
Actively selecting annotations among objects and attributes · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
cost-sensitive active learning
0.112011
Cost-Sensitive Active Visual Category Learning · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
crowdsourcing
0.112011
Large-scale live active learning: Training object detectors with crawled data and crowds · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition › category recognition
object category modeling
0.112011
Cost-Sensitive Active Visual Category Learning · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
region-based detection
0.112011
Efficient region search for object detection · CVPR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

locality-sensitive hashing · 0.7sampling from learned semantic space · 0.7large language model · 0.7optical flow · 0.5multi-stream feature fusion · 0.3multi-scale architecture · 0.3action localization · 0.3multiple instance learning · 0.3active learning · 0.2CNN · 0.2mean shift · 0.2deformable part models · 0.2convolution · 0.2branch-and-cut · 0.1hyperplane queries · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Distribution Aware Metrics for Conditional Natural Language Generation
abstract
Traditional automated metrics for evaluating conditional natural language generation rely on pairwise comparisons between a single generated text and the best-matching gold-standard reference. This method is effective when ground truth data diversity can be attributed to noise, however, it falls short when diversity in references holds valuable contextual information, as in visual description or summarization, as it does not evaluate the ability of a model to generate text matching the diversity of the ground truth samples. In this paper, we challenge the adequacy of existing metrics in such semantically diverse contexts and introduce a novel approach for evaluating conditional language generation models, leveraging a family of meta-metrics that build on existing pairwise distance functions. These meta-metrics assess not just single-samples, but distributions of reference and model-generated captions using small sample sets. We demonstrate our approach through a case study of visual description in the English language which reveals not only how current models prioritize single-description quality over diversity, but further sheds light on the impact of sampling methods and temperature settings on description quality and diversity.
David M. Chan, Yiming Ni, David A. Ross, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Austin Myers, John F. Canny
LREC/COLING4
2023 IC3: Image Captioning by Committee Consensus
abstract
If you ask a human to describe an image, they might do so in a thousand different ways.Image captioning models, on the other hand, are traditionally trained to generate a single "best" (most like a reference) caption.Unfortunately, doing so encourages captions that are informationally impoverished.Such captions often focus on only a subset of possible details, while ignoring other potentially useful information in the scene.In this work, we introduce a simple, yet novel, method: "Image Captioning by Committee Consensus" (IC 3 ), designed to generate a single caption that captures details from multiple viewpoints by sampling from the learned semantic space of a base captioning model, and carefully leveraging a large language model to synthesize these samples into a single comprehensive caption.Our evaluations show that humans rate captions produced by IC 3 more helpful than those produced by SOTA models more than two-thirds of the time, and IC 3 improves the performance of SOTA automated recall systems by up to 84%, outperforming single human-generated reference captions and indicating significant improvements over SOTA approaches for visual description.
Austin Myers, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, David A. Ross, John F. Canny
EMNLP3
2020 Active Learning for Video Description with Cluster-Regularized Ensemble Ranking
David M. Chan, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, David A. Ross, John F. Canny
ACCV (5)2
2018 Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localization
abstract
We propose TAL-Net, an improved approach to temporal action localization in video that is inspired by the Faster RCNN object detection framework. TAL-Net addresses three key shortcomings of existing approaches: (1) we improve receptive field alignment using a multi-scale architecture that can accommodate extreme variation in action durations; (2) we better exploit the temporal context of actions for both proposal generation and action classification by appropriately extending receptive fields; and (3) we explicitly consider multi-stream feature fusion and demonstrate that fusing motion late is important. We achieve state-of-the-art performance for both action proposal and localization on THUMOS'14 detection benchmark and competitive performance on ActivityNet challenge.
Yu-Wei Chao, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Bryan Seybold, David A. Ross, Jia Deng 0001, Rahul Sukthankar
CVPR2
2018 AVA: A Video Dataset of Spatio-Temporally Localized Atomic Visual Actions
abstract
This paper introduces a video dataset of spatio-temporally localized Atomic Visual Actions (AVA). The AVA dataset densely annotates 80 atomic visual actions in 437 15-minute video clips, where actions are localized in space and time, resulting in 1.59M action labels with multiple labels per person occurring frequently. The key characteristics of our dataset are: (1) the definition of atomic visual actions, rather than composite actions; (2) precise spatio-temporal annotations with possibly multiple annotations for each person; (3) exhaustive annotation of these atomic actions over 15-minute video clips; (4) people temporally linked across consecutive segments; and (5) using movies to gather a varied set of action representations. This departs from existing datasets for spatio-temporal action recognition, which typically provide sparse annotations for composite actions in short video clips. AVA, with its realistic scene and action complexity, exposes the intrinsic difficulty of action recognition. To benchmark this, we present a novel approach for action localization that builds upon the current state-of-the-art methods, and demonstrates better performance on JHMDB and UCF101-24 categories. While setting a new state of the art on existing datasets, the overall results on AVA are low at 15.8% mAP, underscoring the need for developing new approaches for video understanding.
Chunhui Gu, Chen Sun 0002, David A. Ross, Carl Vondrick, Caroline Pantofaru, Yeqing Li, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, George Toderici, Susanna Ricco, Rahul Sukthankar, Cordelia Schmid, Jitendra Malik
CVPR7
2015 Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification
abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively applied for image recognition problems giving state-of-the-art results on recognition, detection, segmentation and retrieval. In this work we propose and evaluate several deep neural network architectures to combine image information across a video over longer time periods than previously attempted. We propose two methods capable of handling full length videos. The first method explores various convolutional temporal feature pooling architectures, examining the various design choices which need to be made when adapting a CNN for this task. The second proposed method explicitly models the video as an ordered sequence of frames. For this purpose we employ a recurrent neural network that uses Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) cells which are connected to the output of the underlying CNN. Our best networks exhibit significant performance improvements over previously published results on the Sports 1 million dataset (73.1% vs. 60.9%) and the UCF-101 datasets with (88.6% vs. 88.0%) and without additional optical flow information (82.6% vs. 73.0%).
Joe Yue-Hei Ng, Matthew J. Hausknecht, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Oriol Vinyals, Rajat Monga, George Toderici
CVPR3
2014 Large-Scale Live Active Learning: Training Object Detectors with Crawled Data and Crowds
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2014 Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning
abstract
We consider the problem of retrieving the database points nearest to a given hyperplane query without exhaustively scanning the entire database. For this problem, we propose two hashing-based solutions. Our first approach maps the data to 2-bit binary keys that are locality sensitive for the angle between the hyperplane normal and a database point. Our second approach embeds the data into a vector space where the euclidean norm reflects the desired distance between the original points and hyperplane query. Both use hashing to retrieve near points in sublinear time. Our first method's preprocessing stage is more efficient, while the second has stronger accuracy guarantees. We apply both to pool-based active learning: Taking the current hyperplane classifier as a query, our algorithm identifies those points (approximately) satisfying the well-known minimal distance-to-hyperplane selection criterion. We empirically demonstrate our methods' tradeoffs and show that they make it practical to perform active selection with millions of unlabeled points.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Prateek Jain 0002, Kristen Grauman
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2013 Fast, Accurate Detection of 100, 000 Object Classes on a Single Machine
abstract
Many object detection systems are constrained by the time required to convolve a target image with a bank of filters that code for different aspects of an object's appearance, such as the presence of component parts. We exploit locality-sensitive hashing to replace the dot-product kernel operator in the convolution with a fixed number of hash-table probes that effectively sample all of the filter responses in time independent of the size of the filter bank. To show the effectiveness of the technique, we apply it to evaluate 100,000 deformable-part models requiring over a million (part) filters on multiple scales of a target image in less than 20 seconds using a single multi-core processor with 20GB of RAM. This represents a speed-up of approximately 20,000 times - four orders of magnitude - when compared with performing the convolutions explicitly on the same hardware. While mean average precision over the full set of 100,000 object classes is around 0.16 due in large part to the challenges in gathering training data and collecting ground truth for so many classes, we achieve a mAP of at least 0.20 on a third of the classes and 0.30 or better on about 20% of the classes.
Thomas L. Dean, Mark A. Ruzon, Mark Segal, Jonathon Shlens, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Jay Yagnik
CVPR5
2012 Active Frame Selection for Label Propagation in Videos
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
ECCV (5)1
2011 Efficient region search for object detection
abstract
We propose a branch-and-cut strategy for efficient region-based object detection. Given an oversegmented image, our method determines the subset of spatially contiguous regions whose collective features will maximize a classifier's score. We formulate the objective as an instance of the prize-collecting Steiner tree problem, and show that for a family of additive classifiers this enables fast search for the optimal object region via a branch-and-cut algorithm. Unlike existing branch-and-bounddetection methods designed for bounding boxes, our approach allows scoring of irregular shapes - which is especially critical for objects that do not conform to a rectangular window. We provide results on three challenging object detection datasets, and demonstrate the advantage of rapidly seeking best-scoring regions rather than subwindow rectangles.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
CVPR1
2011 Large-scale live active learning: Training object detectors with crawled data and crowds
abstract
Active learning and crowdsourcing are promising ways to efficiently build up training sets for object recognition, but thus far techniques are tested in artificially controlled settings. Typically the vision researcher has already determined the dataset's scope, the labels “actively” obtained are in fact already known, and/or the crowd-sourced collection process is iteratively fine-tuned. We present an approach for live learning of object detectors, in which the system autonomously refines its models by actively requesting crowd-sourced annotations on images crawled from the Web. To address the technical issues such a large-scale system entails, we introduce a novel part-based detector amenable to linear classifiers, and show how to identify its most uncertain instances in sub-linear time with a hashing-based solution. We demonstrate the approach with experiments of unprecedented scale and autonomy, and show it successfully improves the state-of-the-art for the most challenging objects in the PASCAL benchmark. In addition, we show our detector competes well with popular nonlinear classifiers that are much more expensive to train.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
CVPR1
2011 Actively selecting annotations among objects and attributes
abstract
We present an active learning approach to choose image annotation requests among both object category labels and the objects' attribute labels. The goal is to solicit those labels that will best use human effort when training a multi-class object recognition model. In contrast to previous work in active visual category learning, our approach directly exploits the dependencies between human-nameable visual attributes and the objects they describe, shifting its requests in either label space accordingly. We adopt a discriminative latent model that captures object-attribute and attribute-attribute relationships, and then define a suitable entropy reduction selection criterion to predict the influence a new label might have throughout those connections. On three challenging datasets, we demonstrate that the method can more successfully accelerate object learning relative to both passive learning and traditional active learning approaches.
Adriana Kovashka, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
ICCV2
2011 Cost-Sensitive Active Visual Category Learning
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2010 Far-sighted active learning on a budget for image and video recognition
abstract
Active learning methods aim to select the most informative unlabeled instances to label first, and can help to focus image or video annotations on the examples that will most improve a recognition system. However, most existing methods only make myopic queries for a single label at a time, retraining at each iteration. We consider the problem where at each iteration the active learner must select a set of examples meeting a given budget of supervision, where the budget is determined by the funds (or time) available to spend on annotation. We formulate the budgeted selection task as a continuous optimization problem where we determine which subset of possible queries should maximize the improvement to the classifier's objective, without overspending the budget. To ensure far-sighted batch requests, we show how to incorporate the predicted change in the model that the candidate examples will induce. We demonstrate the proposed algorithm on three datasets for object recognition, activity recognition, and content-based retrieval, and we show its clear practical advantages over random, myopic, and batch selection baselines.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Prateek Jain 0002, Kristen Grauman
CVPR1
2010 Visual recognition and detection under bounded computational resources
abstract
Visual recognition and detection are computationally intensive tasks and current research efforts primarily focus on solving them without considering the computational capability of the devices they run on. In this paper we explore the challenge of deriving methods that consider constraints on computation, appropriately schedule the next best computation to perform and finally have the capability of producing reasonable results at any time when a solution is required. We specifically derive an approach for the task of object category localization and classification in cluttered, natural scenes that can not only produce anytime results but also utilize the principle of value-of-information in order to provide the most recognition bang for the computational buck. Experiments on two standard object detection challenges show that the proposed framework can triage computation effectively and attain state-of-the-art results when allowed to run till completion. Additionally, the real benefit of the proposed framework is highlighted in the experiments where we demonstrate that the method can provide reasonable recognition results even if the procedure needs to terminate before completion.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Ashish Kapoor
CVPR1
2010 Hashing Hyperplane Queries to Near Points with Applications to Large-Scale Active Learning
abstract
We consider the problem of retrieving the database points nearest to a given {\em hyperplane} query without exhaustively scanning the database. We propose two hashing-based solutions. Our first approach maps the data to two-bit binary keys that are locality-sensitive for the angle between the hyperplane normal and a database point. Our second approach embeds the data into a vector space where the Euclidean norm reflects the desired distance between the original points and hyperplane query. Both use hashing to retrieve near points in sub-linear time. Our first method's preprocessing stage is more efficient, while the second has stronger accuracy guarantees. We apply both to pool-based active learning: taking the current hyperplane classifier as a query, our algorithm identifies those points (approximately) satisfying the well-known minimal distance-to-hyperplane selection criterion. We empirically demonstrate our methods' tradeoffs, and show that they make it practical to perform active selection with millions of unlabeled points.
Prateek Jain 0002, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
NIPS2
2009 What's it going to cost you?: Predicting effort vs. informativeness for multi-label image annotations
abstract
Active learning strategies can be useful when manual labeling effort is scarce, as they select the most informative examples to be annotated first. However, for visual category learning, the active selection problem is particularly complex: a single image will typically contain multiple object labels, and an annotator could provide multiple types of annotation (e.g., class labels, bounding boxes, segmentations), any of which would incur a variable amount of manual effort. We present an active learning framework that predicts the tradeoff between the effort and information gain associated with a candidate image annotation, thereby ranking unlabeled and partially labeled images according to their expected “net worth” to an object recognition system. We develop a multi-label multiple-instance approach that accommodates multi-object images and a mixture of strong and weak labels. Since the annotation cost can vary depending on an image's complexity, we show how to improve the active selection by directly predicting the time required to segment an unlabeled image. Given a small initial pool of labeled data, the proposed method actively improves the category models with minimal manual intervention.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
CVPR1
2008 Keywords to visual categories: Multiple-instance learning forweakly supervised object categorization
abstract
Conventional supervised methods for image categorization rely on manually annotated (labeled) examples to learn good object models, which means their generality and scalability depends heavily on the amount of human effort available to help train them. We propose an unsupervised approach to construct discriminative models for categories specified simply by their names. We show that multiple-instance learning enables the recovery of robust category models from images returned by keyword-based search engines. By incorporating constraints that reflect the expected sparsity of true positive examples into a large-margin objective function, our approach remains accurate even when the available text annotations are imperfect and ambiguous. In addition, we show how to iteratively improve the learned classifier by automatically refining the representation of the ambiguously labeled examples. We demonstrate our method with benchmark datasets, and show that it performs well relative to both state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches and traditional fully supervised techniques.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
CVPR1
2008 Multi-Level Active Prediction of Useful Image Annotations for Recognition
abstract
We introduce a framework for actively learning visual categories from a mixture of weakly and strongly labeled image examples. We propose to allow the category-learner to strategically choose what annotations it receives---based on both the expected reduction in uncertainty as well as the relative costs of obtaining each annotation. We construct a multiple-instance discriminative classifier based on the initial training data. Then all remaining unlabeled and weakly labeled examples are surveyed to actively determine which annotation ought to be requested next. After each request, the current classifier is incrementally updated. Unlike previous work, our approach accounts for the fact that the optimal use of manual annotation may call for a combination of labels at multiple levels of granularity (e.g., a full segmentation on some images and a present/absent flag on others). As a result, it is possible to learn more accurate category models with a lower total expenditure of manual annotation effort.
Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Kristen Grauman
NIPS1